Vincent Vermeulen wrote:Right. Good to see it's not overheating, though you won't be cold with this on your lap I think.
Considering how quiet this machine can get when the fan has been freshly cleaned, I wouldn't be surprised the tiniest bit if the mobo was set up in firmware to keep the fan spinning very slowly until the CPU temperature gets pretty high.
The laptop has two graphics cards, the one from Intel (which you are using) and one from Nvidia. Did you perhaps install Nvidia software?
Nope, I have had so many issues with the NVidia driver in the past that I tend to stick with nouveau on every machine where it works well enough.
The processor should be able to handle copying and doing something else (it has 2 cores, with hyperthreading). The hard disk is not very fast though, with only 5400 rpm. But as you mention you didn't have such problems on Fedora, we can't blame the hard disk. I suggest the next time you can make it freeze, then after it unfreezes to open the file /var/log/syslog in a text editor (Gedit, or run from the terminal "less /var/log/syslog") and at the end of the file--where the timestamps match when it froze--check for any errors.
I tried it, but no error has appeared in /var/log/syslog. I also checked CPU usage while I was at it, and it was at about 10% when things get really nasty, so that doesn't seem to be a problem either.
I also checked out iotop's output while I was at it, with the following typical result...
- Code: Select all
Total DISK READ: 26.30 M/s | Total DISK WRITE: 22.89 M/s
PID PRIO USER DISK READ DISK WRITE SWAPIN IO COMMAND
744 be/3 root 0.00 B/s 0.00 B/s 0.00 % 99.99 % [jbd2/sda9-8]
1351 be/4 root 0.00 B/s 0.00 B/s 0.00 % 99.99 % [flush-8:0]
4402 be/4 gralouf 26.30 M/s 26.17 M/s 0.00 % 95.29 % cp -r Téléchargements/ Téléchargements2
35 be/4 root 0.00 B/s 0.00 B/s 0.00 % 86.71 % [kswapd0]
...but as usual with system monitoring tools like iotop, I end up taking a puzzled look at the name of kernel components and wondering if they are working as expected or not. So I did the same thing on Fedora, with the result that jbd2 was still highly sollicitated (as could be expected, since writes imply journaling paperwork), but flush-8 and kswapd0 were much less active, only running occasionally from time to time. Perhaps that comparatively high disk cache flushing and swapping activity on Mint is what causes my performance problem, though what causes said activity itself remains to be understood.