"Microsoft" and "unquestioned compatability" in the same sentence?? LOLdgittler wrote: I've found nothing better than Windows and the whole MS Office suite for features, ease of use, and unquestioned compatability.
"Microsoft" and "unquestioned compatability" in the same sentence?? LOLdgittler wrote: I've found nothing better than Windows and the whole MS Office suite for features, ease of use, and unquestioned compatability.

BTW, ThunderBird has some very nifty


I don't use those features. My "spell checker" are the English lessons of John Patrick O'Neill and the many many years I spent in Swiss schoolsAdler wrote: Can TB spell-check in multiple languages at the same time? I do that with Evolution.
Back at HP I had a signature "hp -- invent" logo (a JPEG file) and I never had troubles with sending URL's. GIF is a proprietary format now, so maybe you should try a free format such as JPEG or PNG?Adler wrote: Also, I never was able to add my signature .GIF to my signature line as I can do with Evolution. Or, HTML links?
The easiest thing to do is to install Thunderbird on Windows, and then let it import the Outlook (where the *.PST files are mounted as folders) settings. From there on it's very easy to transport the Thunderbird settings to any other platform you wish -- just copy the files over into the right place (on Linux: ~/.mozilla-thunderbird ) and you're done.Adler wrote: saved all those .pst files. I've got a lot saved to CD, but never could import them into a Linux app.



scorp123 wrote:"Microsoft" and "unquestioned compatability" in the same sentence?? LOL

dgittler wrote:the fact remains that their software is powerful, easy to use
dgittler wrote:It's a shame, and ironic, that Linux users will boast about a friendly community and proclaim that everyone should have freedom of choice in their software, but then scoff and belittle the choices of others if it's not to their preferences, especially if that choice is Microsoft.

I realize many Linux users love to scoff at Microsoft but the fact remains that their software is powerful, easy to use, and I freely chose it for that reason.


... totally sucks big-time. Don't waste your time trying to convince me of the opposite. Microsoft sucks. Their software is broken by design and a security nightmare. The company has been convicted of illegal activities. They don't stick to any standards but instead 'kidnap' existing standards and then make people believe that their crap changes are "innovations". That's their "embrace + extend + extinguish" tactics. How many noobs are out there who in all earnest believe that Microsoft "invented" TCP/IP and the Internet? Too many! Microsoft sucks big time. That's my personal and professional opinion. In the areas where I work (e.g. security-sensitive zones ...) Microsoft is flat-out banned from the network for being nothing but a waste of valuable system resources and for being the most likely entry point for any security glitch that your network will hit by. And don't get me started on that joke of firewall they ship with XP and onwards.dgittler wrote: but the fact remains that their software ...
You are free to use whatever you want (and can afford) and what works best for you. I am not trying to "missionate" you into using something different.dgittler wrote: easy to use, and I freely chose it for that reason.
I scoff at this particular sentence: << "Microsoft" and "unquestioned compatability" >> ... Especially given that it has been proven time and time again that Microsoft deliberately changes their software so that it in fact *BREAKS* compatibility. I am sorry to say but that sentence of your's is either a really really sad and bad joke or you are not nearly informed and qualified enough to make any statements about "compatibility" and Microsoft software.dgittler wrote: but then scoff and belittle the choices of others if it's not to their preferences, especially if that choice is Microsoft.

its a pretty shade of blue
nothing in it is backwards compatible!






Exactly. It just eats the resources away and if you keep your stuff a bit organised you won't even need those apps.Adler wrote: This might seem like a brutal question, but why run any of these resource intensive applications?
Absolutely. Keep things tidy, don't clutter your desktop with icons you won't use anyway, put text files into a folder "Textfiles", put photos into "Photos/NameOfPersonOnThePhoto" (e.g. Photos/Family/ ... /Photos/Colleagues, etc.) and so on and so on and you won't ever need Beagle ... and you can use the free computer resources for something elseAdler wrote: just keep things organized in my /Home Folder.

Standard shell tools such as 'grep' can do that since the 1970'scontents wrote: The nice thing about tools like beagle and tracker is that they're able to search text within files.
grep "TextWeSearchFor" -r /where/we/search/for/itfind . -name \*.txt -exec grep -H "free soul" {} \;./Documents/Textdocuments/Spartan_Epitaph.txt:Should any free soul come across this placeSee above. It's also possible to perform such tasks easily without such resource-hungry tools.contents wrote: So that if you're looking for all of the documents, html files, etc., where a certain word or name is mentioned, beagle or tracker can find them.
But if you have like 100's of GB of data then this indexing business can take awful long ages. It's just too much of a hassle for me.contents wrote: The major work of indexing, where the cpu speed ramps up and everything slows down, should only happen once, as far as I understand, and that might take five or ten minutes.


Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests