William_G wrote:I'll be sticking with Gnome thanks.
I've looked into the whole almost religious debate over KDE versus Gnome and it seems Gnome is ahead in numbers of people using it and in my opinion its usability and stability.
One thing that has always puzzled me is they say that KDE is more like Windows and Gnome is more like Mac.
This no where near the truth no where near it at all, neither of them looks like Mac they both resemble Windows.
confused ????
It is true: since Ubuntu came, Gnome has overtaken KDE. Before Ubuntu, KDE was the most popular.
I do believe, KDE is amazing technology. Look at the plasmoids and other things.
But THERE IS QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEMATICALLY lacking in KDE.
I find this very sad.
The problems stem from original KDE ist seems, but the KDE capability, Ubuntu side, is also lacking compared to Gnome staff.
As Mint is a child of Ubuntu/Kubuntu they can only go with what they inherit. And yet again, at Mint, I believe just 1 person (boo) doing his utmost best.
That compounds problems (not boo, but the fact that he is alone).
Whether you prefer the look-and-feel of KDE or Gnome is, of course, a matter of taste (I prefer KDE).
But Gnome Versions are just of outstanding quality and stability, especially at Mint.
Gnome 3.0 due out soon may change that temporaily. Let's see whether they avoid the mistakes KDE made when introducing KDE-4.x, where their main
people (i.e. A. Seigo) once famously blogged facing the lack of stability that they ".... have to enjoy the pain a bit".
I dream up a rock solid KDE, but in the meantime take the rock solid Gnome 2.x, or cope with the occasional pitfalls of KDE-4.x
**** By the way, Mint-9-KDE stable has been uploaded to the servers.****
I like to be one of the first to spread the word - so here we go.
I will seed as soon as a bittorrent is available.