The Linux Mint Newsletter - Issue 21 has been released
http://www.linuxmint.com/wiki/index.php ... r_Issue_21
We will release a short newsletter every Monday or Tuesday
The Linux Mint Newsletter - Issue 21
Forum rules
Section reserved for the team. You can reply to announcements here but not post new topics. Do not add support questions to threads here, use the appropriate support forum instead.
Section reserved for the team. You can reply to announcements here but not post new topics. Do not add support questions to threads here, use the appropriate support forum instead.
The Linux Mint Newsletter - Issue 21
Last edited by Husse on Mon Oct 29, 2007 6:18 am, edited 1 time in total.
- linuxviolin
- Level 8
- Posts: 2081
- Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 6:55 pm
- Location: France
Thanks Husse.
But you write
But you write
Good but what about an upgrade patch from Cassandra to Daryna? This will be possible? Maybe?"The challenge for the Mint team will be the upgrade path which will eventually determine whether it’s possible to upgrade from Celena to Daryna"
K.I.S.S. ===> "Keep It Simple, Stupid"
"Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication." (Leonardo da Vinci)
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler." (Albert Einstein)
"Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication." (Leonardo da Vinci)
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler." (Albert Einstein)
- linuxviolin
- Level 8
- Posts: 2081
- Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 6:55 pm
- Location: France
One thing I 'hate' in Ubuntu is to do a re-installation with every release twice a year.
Who needs a new version twice a year? I like Mint but I would like it 'breaks' this cycle.
Maybe the ideal would be a development à la Red-Hat (and its clones: CentOS, Scientific...) by example, with a longer maintenance versions... OK they are enterprise distros type, and then?
There were a few times I used Pardus (I stopped because of their relaxed approach to security) and I was able to upgrade with one simple command to the next version with no problems. Idem with Frugalware... Everything is there even the new artwork. Absolutely perfect!
It is incredible that Ubuntu is not able to do the same
I'm sorry if my post is a little "provocative" and it is a Ubuntu problem (someone was talking about another base in another topic? http://linuxmint.com/forum/viewtopic.ph ... ing&t=5817 ) not specifically a Mint problem
I just wanted to give my humble opinion on the subject...
Who needs a new version twice a year? I like Mint but I would like it 'breaks' this cycle.
Maybe the ideal would be a development à la Red-Hat (and its clones: CentOS, Scientific...) by example, with a longer maintenance versions... OK they are enterprise distros type, and then?
OOOh YES! We must be able to upgrade without problems! (not like Ubuntu)Clem wrote:Hopefully in the future we'll develop a tool called mintUpgrade to automate this.
There were a few times I used Pardus (I stopped because of their relaxed approach to security) and I was able to upgrade with one simple command to the next version with no problems. Idem with Frugalware... Everything is there even the new artwork. Absolutely perfect!
It is incredible that Ubuntu is not able to do the same
I'm sorry if my post is a little "provocative" and it is a Ubuntu problem (someone was talking about another base in another topic? http://linuxmint.com/forum/viewtopic.ph ... ing&t=5817 ) not specifically a Mint problem
I just wanted to give my humble opinion on the subject...
K.I.S.S. ===> "Keep It Simple, Stupid"
"Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication." (Leonardo da Vinci)
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler." (Albert Einstein)
"Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication." (Leonardo da Vinci)
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler." (Albert Einstein)
On upgrade
You are not forced to upgrade just because a new version is released. From Cassandra Mint is so good that you can skip a version or two. Then make a clean install of the first version which supports upgrade with the mint tool
(And I'm not saying that Bianca and earlier is crap, it's just that a lot of Mint goodies were introduced with Cassandra)
You are not forced to upgrade just because a new version is released. From Cassandra Mint is so good that you can skip a version or two. Then make a clean install of the first version which supports upgrade with the mint tool
(And I'm not saying that Bianca and earlier is crap, it's just that a lot of Mint goodies were introduced with Cassandra)
Husse,it's just that a lot of Mint goodies were introduced with Cassandra
You are right about that. Cassandra has been the most well thought out Linux distribution that I ever used.
Adler
Wildwood, New Jersey -- On The Jersey Shore
What Doesn't Kill Me, Makes Me Stronger - Friedrich Nietzsche - Was mich nicht umbringt, macht mich starker
Adler's Home @ http://www.jjmacey.net/, And Where I Have Been.
Blog @ http://jjmacey.net/blog/
Wildwood, New Jersey -- On The Jersey Shore
What Doesn't Kill Me, Makes Me Stronger - Friedrich Nietzsche - Was mich nicht umbringt, macht mich starker
Adler's Home @ http://www.jjmacey.net/, And Where I Have Been.
Blog @ http://jjmacey.net/blog/
- kody
- Level 1
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 3:27 am
- Location: North Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Contact:
Upgrades...
As a linux newb, I had no idea to put my /home mount on a separate partition. Now that I've done that, I expected upgrades to be a piece of cake, especially since the mint installer actually tries to check for user profiles.
But this never works for me!
So, my ideal upgrade and installation would be:
a) the installer finds user profiles successfully,
b) the installer and partition editor always recommend that you have /home mounted to its own partition.
The apps are the easiest part of linux to reinstall I find. It's hassling with user files and permissions and such that really is a big bother. I'd like to upgrade without my wife asking, "where's my wallpaper?! What did you do _this_ time?!"
But this never works for me!
So, my ideal upgrade and installation would be:
a) the installer finds user profiles successfully,
b) the installer and partition editor always recommend that you have /home mounted to its own partition.
The apps are the easiest part of linux to reinstall I find. It's hassling with user files and permissions and such that really is a big bother. I'd like to upgrade without my wife asking, "where's my wallpaper?! What did you do _this_ time?!"
- linuxviolin
- Level 8
- Posts: 2081
- Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 6:55 pm
- Location: France
Yes of course. In fact I am always with CassandraHusse wrote:You are not forced to upgrade just because a new version is released. From Cassandra Mint is so good that you can skip a version or two. Then make a clean install of the first version which supports upgrade with the mint tool
But Cassandra is based on Feisty and Feisty will not be followed for a long time so we need a mint tool quickly
(but in absolute terms it should be possible to upgrade just with apt-get)
And question: six months are really enough to make a distro?
Yes but why have to reinstall? An upgrade should bring up-to-date system perfectly and therefore the user should have nothing to reinstallkody wrote:The apps are the easiest part of linux to reinstall I find.
K.I.S.S. ===> "Keep It Simple, Stupid"
"Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication." (Leonardo da Vinci)
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler." (Albert Einstein)
"Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication." (Leonardo da Vinci)
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler." (Albert Einstein)
- belovedmonster
- Level 5
- Posts: 639
- Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 12:34 pm