i guess i will stick to 11




frank392 wrote:this is the worst mint release ever
i guess i will stick to 11

The Recorder wrote:Just a note to all. I'm running the RC, and just received about a half a dozen updates to Mate and Gnome 3. Gnome 3 has been running fairly well, but Mate and Gnome Classic don't really work (even after the updates). Don't think that the "OK'd for release" iso's that are out there are really Clem's "last word".

mikolodz wrote:frank392 wrote:this is the worst mint release ever
i guess i will stick to 11
No, no, It's not Mint. It's GNOME3. At the beginning, as an Windows user i thought i'm doing sth wrong, but it seams there are different standards than in M$ stuff. I'm not saying Mint ain't good, because it's very stable and easy to use. Unfortunately it changes nothing in terms of being usable for ATI users... The worst thing about that is it would be almost perfect OS for me if gnome process hadn't been killed almost every time I try to open the menu (top left corner). Of course you could say "so don't use official ati driver", but it's not that easy. Without catalyst, my PC is getting very hot, Archon 2x14cm seems to be running at 100% rpm in idle. In addition i have the audio connected to the LCD which is connected to the pc with HDMI cable. Without catalyst i do not have sound. The last thing - vsync or maybe not even vsync but performance? When i'm moving any window it's not even close to smooth. It's jumping as the frame-rate was 10fps, not 60.
It's not the problem of my HW. In Windows 7 or in Ubuntu 10.04lts everything is great and really fast. The same problem exists in Fedora 16 and Ubuntu 11.10. Not only on my PC, but on the notebook too. My notebook has radeon hd4670 and the desktop hd6970. I think gnome devs should spend much more time on ATI cards compatibility. The only difference between "gnome not working" in Mint and Fedora is that when gnome-shell is killed in Fedora it throws an error. Here on Mint nothing happens. Everything disappears and comes back after a while. I'm so disappointed...
Anyone knows is there anything i could do to make it work?





Skellgon wrote:Can you tell me when LM12 is going to be officially announced on the homepage?



Geedunk wrote:Hello ppl,
I just have one question.
I want to intall mint in my new laptop, but i dont want to install mint11 because mint12 is around the corner.
So... my question is, if i install mint 12 RC, i will be able upgrade to final/stable release from RC? Or i need a new and fresh install?
Thanks in advance,





kmb42vt wrote:mikolodz wrote:frank392 wrote:this is the worst mint release ever
i guess i will stick to 11
No, no, It's not Mint. It's GNOME3. At the beginning, as an Windows user i thought i'm doing sth wrong, but it seams there are different standards than in M$ stuff. I'm not saying Mint ain't good, because it's very stable and easy to use. Unfortunately it changes nothing in terms of being usable for ATI users... The worst thing about that is it would be almost perfect OS for me if gnome process hadn't been killed almost every time I try to open the menu (top left corner). Of course you could say "so don't use official ati driver", but it's not that easy. Without catalyst, my PC is getting very hot, Archon 2x14cm seems to be running at 100% rpm in idle. In addition i have the audio connected to the LCD which is connected to the pc with HDMI cable. Without catalyst i do not have sound. The last thing - vsync or maybe not even vsync but performance? When i'm moving any window it's not even close to smooth. It's jumping as the frame-rate was 10fps, not 60.
It's not the problem of my HW. In Windows 7 or in Ubuntu 10.04lts everything is great and really fast. The same problem exists in Fedora 16 and Ubuntu 11.10. Not only on my PC, but on the notebook too. My notebook has radeon hd4670 and the desktop hd6970. I think gnome devs should spend much more time on ATI cards compatibility. The only difference between "gnome not working" in Mint and Fedora is that when gnome-shell is killed in Fedora it throws an error. Here on Mint nothing happens. Everything disappears and comes back after a while. I'm so disappointed...
Anyone knows is there anything i could do to make it work?
Problems have always existed for ATI video cards and graphics hardware in Linux but not because of a fault in Linux nor any particular desktop environment made for Linux (Gnome, KDE, LXDE, etc). The fault lies strictly with ATI with this one and not Linux or Mint or Gnome 3. Nvidia in comparison happily built quality drivers for it's hardware for Linux based distros and Intel HD drivers are already built into the Linux kernel. As far as your problem is concerned I've heard that downloading the latest video drivers for Linux directly off the ATI website and installing them often helps. I've also read in these very forums that the open source ATI drivers actually work better than the proprietary ones in some cases. It all depends on the type of hardware really.




rfd wrote:where's the "show the date" option that still seems to be missing from the date and time settings in m12rc?


swftech wrote:rfd wrote:where's the "show the date" option that still seems to be missing from the date and time settings in m12rc?
The "show date in clock" is in Advanced settings, Shell tab.

rfd wrote:swftech wrote:rfd wrote:where's the "show the date" option that still seems to be missing from the date and time settings in m12rc?
The "show date in clock" is in Advanced settings, Shell tab.
ah, there it is, hidden away ... thanx. would've been easier to just add a click box to the date/time window.



Shadowfax wrote:Been running 12 as a dual boot making changes as suggest by this forum. Despite my
initial outrage at gnome3 I think I can get used to this thing. Just wish we could get
the top bar on the bottom and keep all the notifications. I'm probably a mint lifer now
as long as nothing to radical appears in future editions.
Thanxs to the developers...I know you work tirelessly at this with little or no
compensation. You must be doing something right because your on top now
as far as distrowatch is concerned...



Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests