WORKGROUP vs MSHOME

Questions about cabled networking
Forum rules
Before you post please read this

Re: WORKGROUP vs MSHOME

Postby altair4 on Fri Dec 23, 2011 3:11 pm

[1] In Debian - as in LMDE - there is a "samba" daemon that combines smbd and nmbd into one service. To restart samba you run:
Code: Select all
sudo service samba restart


[2] In Ubuntu - as in all the standard Mint Os's - the two daemons are seperated. To restart samba in Mint ( non - LMDE ) you run:
Code: Select all
sudo service smbd restart

And just to be extra special thorough:
Code: Select all
sudo service nmbd restart


[3] The error message that suggested you install samba4 is a cruel joke since:
These packages contain snapshot versions of Samba 4, the next-generation
version of Samba. These should be considered _experimental_, and should
not be used in production.
In particular, no guarantees are made with
regard to upgrades between versions.

If you took the advice you need to uninstall samba4 and reinstall samba.
Please add a [SOLVED] at the end of your original subject header if your question has been answered and solved.
altair4
Level 13
Level 13
 
Posts: 4662
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 10:27 am

Linux Mint is funded by ads and donations.
 

Re: WORKGROUP vs MSHOME

Postby Prescottech on Wed Apr 18, 2012 10:22 pm

Hmmm. I have a hard time believing that windows XP is the likely network enviorment now days. Many have vista or 7.
Prescottech
Level 1
Level 1
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 6:34 am
Location: Prescott, Arizona

Re: WORKGROUP vs MSHOME

Postby I2k4 on Fri May 04, 2012 3:46 pm

I'll just say this: the first Linux distro that makes home LAN network connection as easy as Windows does, will put all the rest out of business. I've looked into and really don't have time to figure out Samba. I've been enjoying and been impressed with how much I can do on Linux, but I can't connect for file sharing except via DropBox. On Windows I can (OMG) watch a video on my W7 netbook from the external hard drive attached to my XP main computer. On Linux, I can go nuts reading about Samba and scratching my head.
New to Linux. Installed Lubuntu 10.10 on Acer netbook, and experimenting with Mint 13 and other distros on Dell laptop with peripherals (Persistent Live USB).
I2k4
Level 2
Level 2
 
Posts: 53
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 8:33 pm

Re: WORKGROUP vs MSHOME

Postby altair4 on Fri May 04, 2012 6:34 pm

Considering what Windows did to file sharing in Win7 it is now easier to create shares in Linux than it is in Windows.
Please add a [SOLVED] at the end of your original subject header if your question has been answered and solved.
altair4
Level 13
Level 13
 
Posts: 4662
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 10:27 am

Re: WORKGROUP vs MSHOME

Postby xox101 on Tue May 22, 2012 3:52 pm

altair4 wrote:Considering what Windows did to file sharing in Win7 it is now easier to create shares in Linux than it is in Windows.



Nonsense. I have only ever been able to share files from a Linux box to Windows boxes and vice versa without having to change samba settings and that was while using Mepis. No other distribution has ever come close to that out of the box. Windows 7 on the other hand makes sharing files and folders across my network between other pc's and my servers a breeze.

Each and every time I install a new version of Mint/Ubuntu I have to edit smb.conf to suit my network with a file I found a few years ago on the net while hunting for advice about samba. And my network is a bog standard home network. I open the samba folder in etc as administrator/root and replace the conf file with this one. The only thing that has to be changed is the network name, in my case changing from WORKGROUP to MSHOME. Reboot and I have a fully functioning network browser on a Linux box.
Attachments
smb.zip
Samba configuration file
(4.75 KiB) Downloaded 86 times
xox101
Level 1
Level 1
 
Posts: 42
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:34 pm

Re: WORKGROUP vs MSHOME

Postby tarkus on Thu Aug 30, 2012 4:14 pm

I run my laptop on a corporate IT network that is unfortunately totally MS-centric. I had been running LinuxMint 11 happily for the best part of a year and able to access all smb shares and cifs servers I required access to. Last week I upgraded to Maya, and suddenly I can only access shares within the workgroup "WORKGROUP", which doesn't contain anything useful. All attempts to access shared folders on servers in other workgroups fail, either with a "Failed to mount Windows share" error, or a "Cannot display location "smb://xxxyyyy/" Failed to retrieve share list from server".

What the heck changed between these two versions?? :cry:

xox101 wrote:Each and every time I install a new version of Mint/Ubuntu I have to edit smb.conf to suit my network with a file I found a few years ago on the net while hunting for advice about samba. And my network is a bog standard home network. I open the samba folder in etc as administrator/root and replace the conf file with this one. The only thing that has to be changed is the network name, in my case changing from WORKGROUP to MSHOME. Reboot and I have a fully functioning network browser on a Linux box.

That doesn't makse sense to me, since it's actually setting the domain or workgroup for the Samba sever, not the Samba client. Anyway, I did try that, just to see what would happen, and it made no difference at all.
tarkus
Level 1
Level 1
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 12:26 pm

Re: WORKGROUP vs MSHOME

Postby powerhouse on Wed Sep 26, 2012 3:11 am

Not sure my post helps, but I'm running Samba on LM 13 Mate and don't see any accessibility issues. I installed the system-config-samba tool for easier Samba configuration, though I can't remember having used it. I use different workgroup names on the devices - some are mshome, others workgroup, and again others with a different name. I also run a Win7 guest in a VM (domU in Xen).

All shared devices are discovered and accessible, once I enter the username/password for the shares.

The only problem I have is that file transfer under Xen (both dom0 and domU) is much too slow - ~4MB/s where I would expect 10-12MB/s on 100Mb/s Fast Ethernet and something closer to 100MB/s on Gigabit links.
Asus Sabertooth X79 (NOT recommended), i7 3930K CPU, 8x4GB Kingston DDR3 RAM, Noctua NH-D14 SE2011 CPU cooler, Sapphire (AMD) 6450 GPU, PNY Quatro 2000 GPU, Sandisk Extreme 120GB SSD, WD 2TB WD20EARX HD, Corsair 500R case, SeaSonic 660W Gold X-Series PS
powerhouse
Level 4
Level 4
 
Posts: 361
Joined: Thu May 03, 2012 3:54 am

Re: WORKGROUP vs MSHOME

Postby Essexraptor on Sun Jan 20, 2013 10:30 am

qbicdesign wrote:or... right click on my computer > properties > computername
;)
since when was this a Windows support site?
lol



Thanks

At my age ... trying to remember my own name is a struggle... back as far as XP!!

Even here .....these MS titbits are useful with multi OS households :D
Essexraptor
Level 1
Level 1
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2013 10:29 am

Re: WORKGROUP vs MSHOME

Postby Essexraptor on Sun Jan 20, 2013 10:43 am

tarkus wrote:I run my laptop on a corporate IT network that is unfortunately totally MS-centric. I had been running LinuxMint 11 happily for the best part of a year and able to access all smb shares and cifs servers I required access to. Last week I upgraded to Maya, and suddenly I can only access shares within the workgroup "WORKGROUP", which doesn't contain anything useful. All attempts to access shared folders on servers in other workgroups fail, either with a "Failed to mount Windows share" error, or a "Cannot display location "smb://xxxyyyy/" Failed to retrieve share list from server".

What the heck changed between these two versions?? :cry:

xox101 wrote:Each and every time I install a new version of Mint/Ubuntu I have to edit smb.conf to suit my network with a file I found a few years ago on the net while hunting for advice about samba. And my network is a bog standard home network. I open the samba folder in etc as administrator/root and replace the conf file with this one. The only thing that has to be changed is the network name, in my case changing from WORKGROUP to MSHOME. Reboot and I have a fully functioning network browser on a Linux box.


That doesn't makse sense to me, since it's actually setting the domain or workgroup for the Samba sever, not the Samba client. Anyway, I did try that, just to see what would happen, and it made no difference at all.



May not be related... but... I have the same issues on a small home network after each Mint upgrade. I often resort to doing the same as xox101. However..I have also found, with my last 2 Mint installs at least, that it seems to be down to delayed network discovery. Not ideal.... but after booting ... I just leave the thing ticking over for 5 minutes before hitting my Networks Servers link.
Essexraptor
Level 1
Level 1
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2013 10:29 am

Re: WORKGROUP vs MSHOME

Postby xox101 on Fri May 24, 2013 11:08 am

Trying out Mint 15 RC and I have found exactly the same problem as on all other releases, namely I cannot connect to my home network and thus to my server. I tried numerous times but all I ever got was a timeout so I resorted to what I had posted previously and pasted in my downloaded samba configuration file in place of the default one, changed my network name from WORKGROUP to MSHOME, rebooted and voila...my server appears immediately. Obviously this needs to be done as root.
xox101
Level 1
Level 1
 
Posts: 42
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:34 pm

Re: WORKGROUP vs MSHOME

Postby altair4 on Fri May 24, 2013 12:21 pm

Trying out Mint 14 and I have found the exact darn problem as on all other releases, namely I can connect to to every host even though they are in 3 different workgroups. The output of smbtree:
WORKGROUP
\\ALTAIR
\\ALTAIR\J$ Default share
\\ALTAIR\C$ Default share
\\ALTAIR\Linux
\\ALTAIR\ADMIN$ Remote Admin
\\ALTAIR\F$ Default share
\\ALTAIR\I$ Default share
\\ALTAIR\MACBOOK
\\ALTAIR\print$ Printer Drivers
\\ALTAIR\D$ Default share
\\ALTAIR\IPC$ Remote IPC
\\ALTAIR\LMint

VWORKGROUP
\\VVMINT14 vvmint14 server (Samba, LinuxMint)
\\VVMINT14\Public
\\VVMINT14\IPC$ IPC Service (vvmint14 server (Samba, LinuxMint))
\\VVMINT14\print$ Printer Drivers

LWORKGROUP
\\XUB1204 xub1204 server (Samba, Ubuntu)
\\XUB1204\MACBOOK
\\XUB1204\Public
\\XUB1204\Pictures
\\XUB1204\Downloads
\\XUB1204\Test
\\XUB1204\HP970-Draft HP970-Draft
\\XUB1204\HP970-Photo HP970-Photo
\\XUB1204\PDF PDF
\\XUB1204\HP970 HP970
\\XUB1204\IPC$ IPC Service (xub1204 server (Samba, Ubuntu))
\\XUB1204\print$ Printer Drivers

Does anyone know how to fix this because I've been told that all the workgroups need to match?
Please add a [SOLVED] at the end of your original subject header if your question has been answered and solved.
altair4
Level 13
Level 13
 
Posts: 4662
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 10:27 am

Linux Mint is funded by ads and donations.
 
Previous

Return to Ethernet

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: gnudude and 3 guests