


malligt wrote:If you can be a little bit patient, Libre Office will find its way to the testing repositories.




malligt wrote:You would likely be better served to be patient and WAIT until debian testing puts Libre Office into its repsoitories......I apologize, but I absolutely and realistically cannot imagine a reason or an application you could not wait a few days for...
Ya Ya Ya....less a few % less CPU ,and slightly less RAM use... but gimmme a break as to your earth-shattering application that makes you have to need it immediately to this vey second?
Cite the case....PLEASE
Help us all to understand why? Since there is such an imperceptible difference between LO and OO between the 2 of them, why it is you cannot wait and must have LO today?
I have LO on several computers, and OO on several others..... right now besides some icons...???
Seriously, I'd love to know what your personal and specific, and very immediate need is for LO?
I cannot discern a "current" difference between the 2 packages besides as to what I written above....for my own OFFICE needs...but, yes, I can wait for LO to arrive in the repositories without any personal consequences.
So, I'm really genuinely curious to my question.
Please feel free to outline this immediacy of this need is here:
Thanks.



elav wrote:Greetings ..
I do not know why my question has taken an unexpected course in this subject. First I must say I do not speak English, so use a translator, so you may not be clearly understood my message.



malligt wrote:You would likely be better served to be patient and WAIT until debian testing puts Libre Office into its repsoitories......I apologize, but I absolutely and realistically cannot imagine a reason or an application you could not wait a few days for...
Seriously, I'd love to know what your personal and specific, and very immediate need is for LO?
I cannot discern a "current" difference between the 2 packages besides as to what I written above....for my own OFFICE needs...but, yes, I can wait for LO to arrive in the repositories without any personal consequences.
So, I'm really genuinely curious to my question.
Please feel free to outline this immediacy of this need is here:



rivenathos wrote:@ elav - Your translator is very good. It is better than many native English speakers I see posting in the forums.![]()
I know LibreOffice will show up in Testing soon enough. That will be an automatic offering for LMDE. It should be available for Debian Stable via the Backports about the same time. No worries and no hassles.









darco wrote:I dont seem to see the LibreOffice executable in synaptic only the fonts/accessories...I am using the standard repos.
I could download it from their site but just wondering why I dont see it...


Yeticannotski wrote:Hey Everyone,
This is my first post in the Forum and my second day in my new LMDE post-Ubuntu-life.
I perfectly understand that maintainers will need some time to update repositories and who can blame them. Still, I am indeed impatient to leave Oracle's self-sabotaged OO in order to migrate to community-driven LibreOffice. However, I am also ready to have only myself to blame if I break my system only to have LibreOffice installed rather sooner than later. On the other hand, I sincerely believe that, instead of getting angry, maintainers should just regard all these insistent requests as natural "user feedback"!![]()
That said, even though I don't really read Spanish, but I followed this tutorial to add Ubuntu's LibreOffice ppa and it worked fine:
http://elavdeveloper.wordpress.com/2011/01/04/instalar-libreoffice-en-lmde-desde-ppa/
For spell-check, it is still necessary to use OO's dictionaries (".oxt" files) because LibreOffice's link (Tools -> Language -> More Dictionaries On-line) leads to a (so far) incomplete page, which in the future will only host free extensions:
http://libreplanet.org/wiki/Group:OpenOfficeExtensions/List?lang=en-US
When LibreOffice will finally be available in "regular" Debian-LMDE repos, and I look forward to that, I will certainly switch back to them.
Cheers!


elav wrote:I am glad that my humble manual has been useful.

Yeticannotski wrote:elav wrote:I am glad that my humble manual has been useful.
Thank you! Really, it was very helpful. I wouldn't like to be stuck with a static .deb installation. Perhaps, you could update it with information on spell-checkers. I tried to post a "thank you" on your page, but then gave up on the confirmation e-mails.(shame on me)


Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests