LMDE BREAKAGES - tracking TESTING

Post your update and upgrade related errors here
Forum rules
Before you post please read this

Re: LMDE BREAKAGES - tracking TESTING - updated 12 Mar

Postby äxl on Sat Apr 14, 2012 7:49 am

zerozero wrote:i believe so (you'll be using newer pkgs from mate, once in awhile get a bug or a oops in an update >> but i think you can handle it :lol: )

Thanks. That was a compliment, right? :D
Code: Select all
           deb-src http://packages.linuxmint.com/ debian main import backport romeo upstream #Added by software-properties
           deb-src http://ftp.debian.org/debian testing main contrib non-free
           deb-src http://security.debian.org/ testing/updates main contrib non-free
           deb-src http://www.debian-multimedia.org testing main non-free

Are you building/compiling yourself? :shock:
My Linux history: Ubuntu 10.04 - 10.10 - LMDE 201109 - UP4 My sources.list/preferences

Computers is not science. And it's not magic - it's something in between.
User avatar
äxl
Level 5
Level 5
 
Posts: 524
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2012 6:14 am
Location: Germany

Linux Mint is funded by ads and donations.
 

Re: LMDE BREAKAGES - tracking TESTING - updated 12 Mar

Postby Chris M on Sun Apr 15, 2012 2:22 am

The 32-bit kernel was updated today from linux-image-3.2.0-2-686-pae_3.2.12-1_i386 to linux-image-3.2.0-2-686-pae_3.2.14-1_i386. When I updated and upgraded, I got the following errors:

Code: Select all
The following packages will be upgraded:
  linux-image-3.2.0-2-686-pae
1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
1 not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 0 B/22.8 MB of archives.
After this operation, 17.4 kB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y
Reading changelogs... Done
Preconfiguring packages ...
(Reading database ... 190945 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace linux-image-3.2.0-2-686-pae 3.2.12-1 (using .../linux-image-3.2.0-2-686-pae_3.2.14-1_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement linux-image-3.2.0-2-686-pae ...
Examining /etc/kernel/postrm.d .
run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postrm.d/initramfs-tools 3.2.0-2-686-pae /boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-2-686-pae
run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postrm.d/zz-extlinux 3.2.0-2-686-pae /boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-2-686-pae
P: Checking for EXTLINUX directory... found.
P: Writing config for /boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-2-686-pae...
P: Writing config for Microsoft Windows XP Professional on /dev/sda1...
E: /usr/share/syslinux/themes/debian/extlinux: No such file or directory
run-parts: /etc/kernel/postrm.d/zz-extlinux exited with return code 1
Failed to process /etc/kernel/postrm.d at /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-image-3.2.0-2-686-pae.postrm line 212.
dpkg: warning: subprocess old post-removal script returned error exit status 1
dpkg - trying script from the new package instead ...
Examining /etc/kernel/postrm.d .
run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postrm.d/initramfs-tools 3.2.0-2-686-pae /boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-2-686-pae
run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postrm.d/zz-extlinux 3.2.0-2-686-pae /boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-2-686-pae
P: Checking for EXTLINUX directory... found.
P: Writing config for /boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-2-686-pae...
P: Writing config for Microsoft Windows XP Professional on /dev/sda1...
E: /usr/share/syslinux/themes/debian/extlinux: No such file or directory
run-parts: /etc/kernel/postrm.d/zz-extlinux exited with return code 1
Failed to process /etc/kernel/postrm.d at /var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/postrm line 212.
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-image-3.2.0-2-686-pae_3.2.14-1_i386.deb (--unpack):
 subprocess new post-removal script returned error exit status 1
configured to not write apport reports
                                      Examining /etc/kernel/postrm.d .
run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postrm.d/initramfs-tools 3.2.0-2-686-pae /boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-2-686-pae
run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postrm.d/zz-extlinux 3.2.0-2-686-pae /boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-2-686-pae
P: Checking for EXTLINUX directory... found.
P: Writing config for /boot/vmlinuz-liquorix...
P: Writing config for Microsoft Windows XP Professional on /dev/sda1...
E: /usr/share/syslinux/themes/debian/extlinux: No such file or directory
run-parts: /etc/kernel/postrm.d/zz-extlinux exited with return code 1
Failed to process /etc/kernel/postrm.d at /var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/postrm line 212.
dpkg: error while cleaning up:
 subprocess new post-removal script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
 /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-image-3.2.0-2-686-pae_3.2.14-1_i386.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)


There was a similar issue recently for dcihon in the SID thread (starting on SID Breakages page 42) .

I tried to force it, but no go. In synaptic, I got: E: /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-image-3.2.0-2-686-pae_3.2.14-1_i386.deb: subprocess new post-removal script returned error exit status 1

Synaptic got stuck: E: The package linux-image needs to be reinstalled, but I can't find an archive for it.

Tried to remove 3.2.0-2-686-pae a number of ways, but it got stuck. The system insisted on a reinstall, but would not take the reinstall. This helped: apt-get how to fix very broken packages - and it unstuck synaptic.

I ran to SMXI and ended up installing the latest liquorix kernel (backup kernel), and then was able to remove the linux pae kernel, and reinstall it in SMXI. But my system is still broken. DU produces:

Code: Select all
3 not fully installed or removed.
After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]? Y
Setting up linux-image-3.2.0-14.dmz.1-liquorix-686 (3.2.0-19) ...
Running depmod.
Examining /etc/kernel/postinst.d.
run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postinst.d/dkms 3.2.0-14.dmz.1-liquorix-686 /boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-14.dmz.1-liquorix-686
dkms.conf: Error! No 'BUILT_MODULE_NAME' directive specified for record #0.
Error! Bad conf file.
File:
does not represent a valid dkms.conf file.
run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools 3.2.0-14.dmz.1-liquorix-686 /boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-14.dmz.1-liquorix-686
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-3.2.0-14.dmz.1-liquorix-686
run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postinst.d/pm-utils 3.2.0-14.dmz.1-liquorix-686 /boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-14.dmz.1-liquorix-686
run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postinst.d/zz-extlinux 3.2.0-14.dmz.1-liquorix-686 /boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-14.dmz.1-liquorix-686
P: Checking for EXTLINUX directory... found.
P: Writing config for /boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-2-686-pae...
P: Writing config for /boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-14.dmz.1-liquorix-686...
P: Writing config for Microsoft Windows XP Professional on /dev/sda1...
E: /usr/share/syslinux/themes/debian/extlinux: No such file or directory
run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/zz-extlinux exited with return code 1
Failed to process /etc/kernel/postinst.d at /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-image-3.2.0-14.dmz.1-liquorix-686.postinst line 774.
dpkg: error processing linux-image-3.2.0-14.dmz.1-liquorix-686 (--configure):
 subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Setting up linux-image-3.2.0-2-686-pae (3.2.14-1) ...
configured to not write apport reports
                                      Running depmod.
Examining /etc/kernel/postinst.d.
run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postinst.d/dkms 3.2.0-2-686-pae /boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-2-686-pae
dkms.conf: Error! No 'BUILT_MODULE_NAME' directive specified for record #0.
Error! Bad conf file.
File:
does not represent a valid dkms.conf file.
run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools 3.2.0-2-686-pae /boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-2-686-pae
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-3.2.0-2-686-pae
run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postinst.d/pm-utils 3.2.0-2-686-pae /boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-2-686-pae
run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postinst.d/zz-extlinux 3.2.0-2-686-pae /boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-2-686-pae
P: Checking for EXTLINUX directory... found.
P: Writing config for /boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-2-686-pae...
P: Writing config for /boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-14.dmz.1-liquorix-686...
P: Writing config for Microsoft Windows XP Professional on /dev/sda1...
E: /usr/share/syslinux/themes/debian/extlinux: No such file or directory
run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/zz-extlinux exited with return code 1
Failed to process /etc/kernel/postinst.d at /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-image-3.2.0-2-686-pae.postinst line 696.
dpkg: error processing linux-image-3.2.0-2-686-pae (--configure):
 subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of linux-image-686-pae:
 linux-image-686-pae depends on linux-image-3.2.0-2-686-pae; however:
  Package linux-image-3.2.0-2-686-pae is not configured yet.
dpkg: error processing linux-image-686-pae (--configure):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
configured to not write apport reports
                                      configured to not write apport reports
                                                                            Errors were encountered while processing:
 linux-image-3.2.0-14.dmz.1-liquorix-686
 linux-image-3.2.0-2-686-pae
 linux-image-686-pae
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)


It's not a disaster, but it'll require a re-installation. The kernel Borkage is too baked into the cake.

Is anyone else having a problem with this minor kernel update?
Chris M
Level 2
Level 2
 
Posts: 85
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 10:01 pm

Re: LMDE BREAKAGES - tracking TESTING - updated 12 Mar

Postby GregE on Sun Apr 15, 2012 2:34 am

Hi Chris,

Just a suggestion - rather that a re-install I would just get the latest Liquorix, which is now 3.3, boot into it and remove all the Debian kernels and headers and simply wait. As long as the Liquorix kernels function correctly for you this hiccup should pass.You might have to manually clean up /boot (carefully) and maybe some folders in /lib. But I would leave it alone unless there are residual problems. And then run sudo apt-get clean. If you can run Liquorix and update without errors then I would just wait it out.

Go to Liquorix and add the repo and set it up so Liquorix updates through the normal mechanism.

http://liquorix.net/

:)
User avatar
GregE
Level 4
Level 4
 
Posts: 453
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2011 6:24 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: LMDE BREAKAGES - tracking TESTING - updated 12 Mar

Postby Chris M on Sun Apr 15, 2012 2:58 am

Hey there, Greg. Thanks for that. One thing I'll say is that every time I get into trouble and reach for something new - like SMXI and now Liquorix - I learn a little more. This is the 2nd time in the last year I've been " " far away from reinstalling, but been saved at the very last moment.

A google search for Failed to process /etc/kernel/postrm.d at /var/lib/dpkg/info, led me here: http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=75566

I installed syslinux-themes-debian and now everything is back to normal :D


I just recently removed memtest, and removing memtest also removed syslinux-themes-debian. This is the 2nd time removing memtest has screwed me up. I think I'll leave it alone (memtest shows up in grub).

All's well.

Thanks, though. I definitely see some performance gain booting up into Liquorix. But even on this machine with 2 gigs of memory (and a decent graphics card), I'm seriously considering a jump to 64-bit (maybe in Liquorix too). Thanks again.
Chris M
Level 2
Level 2
 
Posts: 85
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 10:01 pm

Re: LMDE BREAKAGES - tracking TESTING - updated 12 Mar

Postby äxl on Sun Apr 15, 2012 11:02 am

So you can't rid of the Liquorix kernel once installed? :D
My Linux history: Ubuntu 10.04 - 10.10 - LMDE 201109 - UP4 My sources.list/preferences

Computers is not science. And it's not magic - it's something in between.
User avatar
äxl
Level 5
Level 5
 
Posts: 524
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2012 6:14 am
Location: Germany

Re: LMDE BREAKAGES - tracking TESTING - updated 12 Mar

Postby viking777 on Sun Apr 15, 2012 1:26 pm

I just recently removed memtest, and removing memtest also removed syslinux-themes-debian


No need to do that to clean up grub. Just install grub-customizer, start it up and remove the tick from the box labelled 'memtest' then you never see it again and it doesn't interfere with any kernel upgrades.

It does a lot of other good things as well - have a look if you want to.
Fujitsu Lifebook AH532. Intel i5 processor, 6Gb ram, Intel HD3000 graphics, Intel Audio/wifi. Realtek RTL8111/8168B Ethernet.Lubuntu 13.10,Ubuntu12.10 (Unity), Mint16 (Cinnamon), Manjaro (Xfce).
Image
User avatar
viking777
Level 14
Level 14
 
Posts: 5153
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 11:21 am

Re: LMDE BREAKAGES - tracking TESTING - updated 12 Mar

Postby GeneC on Sun Apr 15, 2012 1:43 pm

viking777 wrote:................... Just install grub-customizer, start it up and remove the tick from the box labelled 'memtest' then you never see it again and it doesn't interfere with any kernel upgrades.

It does a lot of other good things as well - have a look if you want to.


I really like this app.
+1 :mrgreen:
Last edited by GeneC on Sun Apr 15, 2012 7:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
GeneC

AMD Phenom2x4 3.2 ghz, 12GB DDR3, Nvidia GTX 460

Qiana (Cinnamon/XFCE)
Sparky XFCE (Debian Testing)
LMDE Cin 2.2 (SID)
User avatar
GeneC
Level 7
Level 7
 
Posts: 1538
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2010 1:59 pm
Location: Maine, USA

Re: LMDE BREAKAGES - tracking TESTING - updated 12 Mar

Postby Chris M on Sun Apr 15, 2012 3:01 pm

Viking and Gene, thanks for that. If we never ran into any issues with Debian, we wouldn't learn very much.

äxl wrote:So you can't rid of the Liquorix kernel once installed? :D


I have both installed now. It's like having an old kernel installed. I haven't tried uninstalling it yet (and I may not), but I'm assuming you could boot into the standard kernel provided by Debian, and then uninstall Liquorix like you would an old kernel.
Chris M
Level 2
Level 2
 
Posts: 85
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 10:01 pm

Re: LMDE BREAKAGES - tracking TESTING - updated 12 Mar

Postby zerozero on Sun Apr 15, 2012 3:20 pm

Chris M wrote:Viking and Gene, thanks for that. If we never ran into any issues with Debian, we wouldn't learn very much.

äxl wrote:So you can't rid of the Liquorix kernel once installed? :D


I have both installed now. It's like having an old kernel installed. I haven't tried uninstalling it yet (and I may not), but I'm assuming you could boot into the standard kernel provided by Debian, and then uninstall Liquorix like you would an old kernel.

i's been a loooong time i don't use liquorix (i tried one 2.35 build and wasn't nothing special and then the update to a 2.37 couldn't build the broadcom drivers, so i gave up on it) but yeahh uninstall it is easy (as long as it's properly installed :wink: ) << and this was in the last deep-freeze time, when we were stuck in an old .32 kernel for months, since then we can't complain (probably some will say that we have to many kernel updates in the cycle :lol: )

from june on it's probably time to look again into liquorix.
zerozero
Level 16
Level 16
 
Posts: 6467
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 2:29 pm

Re: LMDE BREAKAGES - tracking TESTING - updated 12 Mar

Postby GregE on Sun Apr 15, 2012 10:54 pm

Hi Everyone,

Just to clarify the use of Liquorix kernels. Liquorix kernels are third party kernels that are specifically written for Debian. They are configured and optimised for the home PC rather that a server. They use the BFS scheduler. If you are a gamer then you should at least try them. If your computer does little more than surf the web and run LibreOffice then you would never notice any difference. They are like any other kernel from the normal channels in that they can be installed or removed via normal methods (once you add the Liquorix repository to your apt sources.list).

I am currently running a 3.3 Liquorix kernel and have all other kernels removed. Everything runs and updates come through as they should.

If you are curious or want to jump to a newer kernel then by all means install Liquorix. Often the version numbers with Sid are the same and differences are minor. Liqourix kernels can be removed any time as long as it is not the currently running kernel. That rule is the same for all kernels.

The most important thing is that everyone here now knows they exist and an alternative is available if you have issues with the mainline kernels. In the past I have had issues with Liquorix and my notebook, and at other times they have solved issues. At one time I could not suspend/resume with a normal kernel but could with Liquorix, then that problem went away.

Liquorix kernels are a nice alternative to have when things go wrong, and some people never use anything else.
User avatar
GregE
Level 4
Level 4
 
Posts: 453
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2011 6:24 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: LMDE BREAKAGES - tracking TESTING - updated 12 Mar

Postby Brian49 on Mon Apr 16, 2012 1:31 pm

GregE - Do you happen to know why the installed size of a Liquorix kernel image is noticeably larger than that of a standard kernel image, please (138Mb against 107Mb for the 64-bit versions on my system)? Many thanks.
Brian49
Level 5
Level 5
 
Posts: 610
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2009 2:27 pm

Re: LMDE BREAKAGES - tracking TESTING - updated 12 Mar

Postby GregE on Mon Apr 16, 2012 9:22 pm

Brian49 wrote:GregE - Do you happen to know why the installed size of a Liquorix kernel image is noticeably larger than that of a standard kernel image, please (138Mb against 107Mb for the 64-bit versions on my system)? Many thanks.


I have never noticed that. I have no knowledge of the reason. I have a good guess though. Debian has a policy of not allowing any non-free code in the default install, and perhaps that does not matter to Liquorix.
User avatar
GregE
Level 4
Level 4
 
Posts: 453
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2011 6:24 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: LMDE BREAKAGES - tracking TESTING - updated 12 Mar

Postby gcp on Mon Apr 16, 2012 10:09 pm

...and if you want to try the very very latest kernel,
then i can recommend the aptosid kernel.
It does not use the BFS-Scheduler, if you dont like it.

This one is updated only hours after Linus announces a new kernel
and is updated in a fast rate, because of newest fixes.
Just install 2 packages:
The header and, only after success, the image package appropriate to your system architecture.
ftp://ftp.spline.de/pub/aptosid/debian/ ... x-aptosid/
For a changelog look into the file *_multi.changes.

But my main kernel is Liquorix too.
Its the most stable and best working kernel...

And so i have 3 different kernels on my system (LMDE SID),
Debian, Liquorix, Aptosid
because ... with debian we can do that. :lol:
<login2 debianSID><sudo apt-get dist-upgrade><DONTTHINK><ENTER><WHOCARES><ENTER><OOHHNOO!><HAVENOBACKUP,IM-A-MAN><reinstalling,Windowslike...>
User avatar
gcp
Level 1
Level 1
 
Posts: 27
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 6:24 am

Re: LMDE BREAKAGES - tracking TESTING - updated 12 Mar

Postby ammon on Sun Apr 22, 2012 1:07 pm

Status of gnome 3.4?

Is it possible to upgrade?
User avatar
ammon
Level 1
Level 1
 
Posts: 24
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2011 9:12 am

Re: LMDE BREAKAGES - tracking TESTING - updated 12 Mar

Postby GeneC on Sun Apr 22, 2012 1:39 pm

ammon wrote:Status of gnome 3.4?

Is it possible to upgrade?


ammon

No, (Gnome 3.4) is not even up to date yet in 'Experimental' :(

See :arrow: http://www.0d.be/debian/debian-gnome-3.4-status.html
GeneC

AMD Phenom2x4 3.2 ghz, 12GB DDR3, Nvidia GTX 460

Qiana (Cinnamon/XFCE)
Sparky XFCE (Debian Testing)
LMDE Cin 2.2 (SID)
User avatar
GeneC
Level 7
Level 7
 
Posts: 1538
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2010 1:59 pm
Location: Maine, USA

Re: LMDE BREAKAGES - tracking TESTING - updated 12 Mar

Postby mockturtl on Tue Apr 24, 2012 5:11 pm

Has anyone noticed i386 Thunderbird's auto-updater hangs when connecting to the update server? I saw this with the 11.0.1 upgrade, and now with 12.0.

Temporarily changing the folder's owner fixes the problem.

Code: Select all
sudo chown -R myusername:myusername /opt/thunderbird


It doesn't occur on amd64 (note, different package; 11.0 rather than 11.0-1lmde1).

I guess Firefox will auto-update to v12 soon.
Image
User avatar
mockturtl
Level 4
Level 4
 
Posts: 437
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 8:51 pm

Re: LMDE BREAKAGES - tracking TESTING - updated 12 Mar

Postby gozer on Thu Apr 26, 2012 3:45 pm

I have one issue which I believe is kernel related, and another that I have no idea where to begin.

I recently lost sound, and all video and sound apps were playing too fast. My video/sound card is a Radeon HD 3200. I'm using S/PDIF (optical) from the board to external speakers.

It seems related to this issue, and adding the line to grub does fix the video/audio speed. Unfortunately there is still no sound. S/PDIF is NOT muted.

This thread seems to be my issue exactly, but they never resolved it.

So there's that. I wanted to try another kernel, which leads me to my 2nd issue: I have no keyboard input at the grub menu. As I said above, I don't know where to begin. I attempted to get into a menu in bios but lost keyboard after opening the menu.

UPDATE: fixed the 'playing too fast' problem by using the workaround in this bug report. After rebooting however, my sound was still not working. I found that the wrong sound device was selected in the sound control panel (HTMI instead of on-board).

I still don't have a fix for the keyboard issue, and since it happens before anything Linux loads, it's probably an issue with my hardware and/or BIOS settings.
Last edited by gozer on Mon Apr 30, 2012 11:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
Debian Testing
g+
gozer
Level 1
Level 1
 
Posts: 40
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 1:57 pm

Re: LMDE BREAKAGES - tracking TESTING - updated 12 Mar

Postby zerozero on Fri Apr 27, 2012 2:34 pm

gozer, that keyboard issue looks like udev (Gerd had a few posts about it, this is one of those) >> viewtopic.php?f=198&t=67502&p=434495&hilit=udev#p434495
zerozero
Level 16
Level 16
 
Posts: 6467
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 2:29 pm

Re: LMDE BREAKAGES - tracking TESTING - updated 12 Mar

Postby BostonPeng on Fri Apr 27, 2012 2:57 pm

Just a quick note to to say that I got my laptop's broken screen replaced with a new laptop, and while it's got LMDE/KDE I'm going to stay out of testing for a while. I got so backed up on things that I don't have the time to check for testing updates for now, although I'll probably be back at some point.

Thanks to everyone who helped me while I sojourned in the Testing world. I couldn't have done it without y'all's help. One of these days I want to buy those rounds you guys have earned.
J.M. "BostonPeng" Hardin
Now very happily running SolydK
My new Linux blog: Tux + Me
It's time for Dodgers baseball!
User avatar
BostonPeng
Level 5
Level 5
 
Posts: 619
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2010 8:50 am
Location: Boston, MA

Re: LMDE BREAKAGES - tracking TESTING - updated 12 Mar

Postby Lippy on Sun May 06, 2012 4:32 pm

I'm a bit late on this, but I think there's a small problem with gtk3-engines-unico 1.0.2. It's taken me a while to work this out because I made the jump to Cinnamon at the same time, and because the issue isn't too noticeable. Themes using the Unico engine now appear to have minor graphical glitches. This is most noticeable with the scrollbar in gedit, buttons, checkboxes, etc. I don't recall the glitches ever occurring with version 1.0.1. Themes based on the Adwaita engine seem to look fine.

EDIT: Trust me to tpyo on the package name!
LMDE (tracking Testing) with Cinnamon; Intel Core 2 Duo E8400, Nvidia GeForce GTX 260 (using Nouveau)
Lippy
Level 2
Level 2
 
Posts: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 12:28 pm

Linux Mint is funded by ads and donations.
 
PreviousNext

Return to Update/Upgrade Issues

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: dumas777 and 5 guests