Why LMDE developer team ignore this. Is this too hard to make or what?
p.s: If developers' replies are negative, I will start a signature collection campaign (signature= name & e-mail)

hsngrms wrote:Daily builds have big advantages

TomRoche wrote:hsngrms wrote:Daily builds have big advantages
True, but ISOs are big files: dailies would consume lots host space and bandwidth.

hsngrms wrote:Daily builds have big advantages. Issues found rapidly, feedbacks are beneficial.
Why LMDE developer team ignore this. Is this too hard to make or what?
p.s: If developers' replies are negative, I will start a signature collection campaign (signature= name & e-mail)

Is Linux Mint 4. most widely used distro or have i wrong information ?
Must have a huge server already.



Aging Technogeek wrote:hsngrms said
You have incorrect and out of date information. Linux Mint 4 reached end-of-life and lost all support over two years ago. The current version of Linux Mint is Mint 11 and it is not the most widely used distro - that would be Ubuntu.
Also, Mint must depend on third party servers and mirrors to distribute their .iso files. Loading these servers with daily builds of two Debian based and four Ubuntu based versions would not be appreciated by the server owners and maintainers.
As to creating daily builds, if the Mint development team was the size of the teams Microsoft has working on Windows, it might be feasible to make daily builds every night.
The current Mint development team is 4 people, only one of whom devotes full time to Mint. The others all must work for a living outside of Mint and do development work in their off time. With this small team, clem puts out 6 versions of Mint every six months or so. I think you can understand why daily builds are not a priority.

hsngrms wrote:Aging Technogeek wrote:hsngrms said
You have incorrect and out of date information. Linux Mint 4 reached end-of-life and lost all support over two years ago. The current version of Linux Mint is Mint 11 and it is not the most widely used distro - that would be Ubuntu.
Also, Mint must depend on third party servers and mirrors to distribute their .iso files. Loading these servers with daily builds of two Debian based and four Ubuntu based versions would not be appreciated by the server owners and maintainers.
As to creating daily builds, if the Mint development team was the size of the teams Microsoft has working on Windows, it might be feasible to make daily builds every night.
The current Mint development team is 4 people, only one of whom devotes full time to Mint. The others all must work for a living outside of Mint and do development work in their off time. With this small team, clem puts out 6 versions of Mint every six months or so. I think you can understand why daily builds are not a priority.
OK. I understand.
But
4. isn't 4
4. is fourth
1. Windows
2. Mac OS
3. Ubuntu
4. Linux Mint
My fault is saying "distro", correct locution="operating system"
And, only want Debian-based daily builds, not other 4 Ubuntu-based...





hsngrms wrote:Is this too hard to make or what?
hsngrms wrote:Is Linux Mint 4. (fourth) most widely used operating system or have i wrong information ?

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest