






xenopeek wrote:Through my experience with Linux, I came to the conclusion that no DE compares to Cinnamon in terms of practicality, flexibility, compatibility, elegance and speed. It's quite rare to find such combination in one DE, not even the classic gnome 2 and MATE. And I think Linux Mint should give it more development time. What do you think guys?
In other words, this is rather subjective


rajuvembala wrote:I think cinnamon brought the usability of windows environment to linux so my vote goes to cinnamon
(very subjective)












HardyH wrote:Stability:
Cinnamon freezes a couple of times a day, in 90% of these cases, it is sufficient to restart cinnamon, but it causes complete system freezes at least 2 times a day, where i had to pull the power plug from my machine and power it up again. This is a no go for productivity systems and disqualifies Cinnamon for me completely. Under MATE, my DE never freezes or locks up the whole system.





xenopeek wrote:HardyH wrote:Stability:
Cinnamon freezes a couple of times a day, in 90% of these cases, it is sufficient to restart cinnamon, but it causes complete system freezes at least 2 times a day, where i had to pull the power plug from my machine and power it up again. This is a no go for productivity systems and disqualifies Cinnamon for me completely. Under MATE, my DE never freezes or locks up the whole system.
Have you looked in your /var/log/syslog file? Cinnamon crashing several times per day is a symptom of something else going wrong, something you would want to fix. In my case it was a bug in the UEFI of my motherboard, which I managed to fix initially with a kernel parameter tweak and recently completely solved with a UEFI upgrade. Cinnamon doesn't crash ever now.


JWJones wrote:Sure, I'll bite...
Through my experience with Linux, I came to the conclusion that no DE compares to XFCE in terms of practicality, flexibility, compatibility, elegance (bwahaha!) and speed. It's quite rare to find such combination in one DE, not even Cinnamon, MATE, or KDE. And I think Linux Mint should give it more development time. What do you think guys?

JWJones wrote:Sure, I'll bite...
Through my experience with Linux, I came to the conclusion that no DE compares to XFCE in terms of practicality, flexibility, compatibility, elegance (bwahaha!) and speed. It's quite rare to find such combination in one DE, not even Cinnamon, MATE, or KDE. And I think Linux Mint should give it more development time. What do you think guys?



HardyH wrote:If it would not use Thunar, I'd almost agree






Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests