LXDE vs XFCE
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:57 am
hi
Is LXDE2 faster than XFCE4 and what about stability?
Is LXDE2 faster than XFCE4 and what about stability?
Thx, Peppermint seems to be a very interesting distro, but based on Debian like Mint?veggen wrote:If you like LXDE, give Peppermint a go. It's a Mint-like distro that comes with LXDE. Of course, you just install LXDE in Mint.
Yes, Peppermint is also Debian based, and borrows some tools from Mint.ccc wrote: Thx, Peppermint seems to be a very interesting distro, but based on Debian like Mint?
ccc wrote:hi
Is LXDE2 faster than XFCE4 and what about stability?
peppermint is based on ubuntu http://peppermintos.com/release-notes/veggen wrote:Yes, Peppermint is also Debian based, and borrows some tools from Mint.ccc wrote: Thx, Peppermint seems to be a very interesting distro, but based on Debian like Mint?
DamnSmallLinux was since about 4 years no longer an active project, but it seems to be active again.axel668 wrote: If you really can't afford the extra 20MB, you should rather go for Enlightenment (Bodhi) or pure Openbox (Crunchbang) or a specialized distribution for old hardware like Damn Small Linux.
So, LXDE uses less RAM but it's not lighter? The RAM saved depends on implementation, for Mint the difference is (within the same base) bigger and for slower computers with less RAM that difference is enough to make LXDE feel faster.axel668 wrote:No, LXDE is not lighter and faster, at least not considerably. It saves roughly 20MB of RAM, but that's about it.
LXDE does everything I need it to do, why should I use something heavier and bigger to do the same? LXDE has enough features and customization for me and I like to do the maximum with the minimum possible, it's fun and a good way to learn.axel668 wrote:XFCE on the other hand gives you a lot of additional features and customization options and much better looks (it even has a lightweight composition engine built into XFWM, you can activate it under 'Window Manager Tweaks').
You just proved you don't know LXDE. I tested several distros with XFCE back in 2000 and was much worst than early Lubuntu versions. Should I assume that it never got better and today still sucks? Not really a fair comparison, right?axel668 wrote:XFCE goes back to 1999 and is the most stable and mature desktop environment you can imagine. I haven't tried LXDE lately but the last time I did (early Lubuntu version) it was not compelling.
Nice distros, I would add AntiX and Puppy. LXDE is becoming a standard for easy to use light distros, both Lubuntu and Debian LXDE are good examples and several low RAM devices use Linux (Debian) with LXDE like the Nokia N900 with easy Debian and the Raspberry Pi with Raspbian.axel668 wrote:If you really can't afford the extra 20MB, you should rather go for Enlightenment (Bodhi) or pure Openbox (Crunchbang) or a specialized distribution for old hardware like Damn Small Linux.
Yep, you're right. When I said it's Debian based I was going for "uses DEBs", since I figured that's what the OP meant (they said "based on Debian like Mint").zerozero wrote:peppermint is based on ubuntu http://peppermintos.com/release-notes/veggen wrote:Yes, Peppermint is also Debian based, and borrows some tools from Mint.ccc wrote: Thx, Peppermint seems to be a very interesting distro, but based on Debian like Mint?
Very nice link and thanks for linking to Seppalta's site. That's a must read.nunol wrote:... http://forums.linuxmint.com/viewtopic.php?f=42&t=96465. ....
Yes it is!aes2011 wrote:... thanks for linking to Seppalta's site. That's a must read.