I disagree. I find the brown highly ugly and not relaxing at all ... au contraire! That's why I actually stayed with "Barbara" -- because of its indeed relaxing blueish theme. And of the various Ubuntu (= non-Mint) distros I clearly prefer Kubuntu: KDE + blueish. Ubuntu with that ugly brownish and orangeish color tones everywhere??? Thanks but ... NO THANKS!clem wrote:The brown is different, it's human and it's relaxing.
but when people come into contact with Linux they will be treated to horrible looking brown poo.
belovedmonster wrote:The average computer user doesnt want to have to customise things.
Depends on the poison, e.g. the poison causes rats to produce blue poo so that we humans know that the rat has been successfully poisoned and is soon to die a slow and painful death. Rats usually retreat into hard-to-reach corners when they feel they are diying ... so that's why someone came up with slow-acting rat poison that will cause them to produce blue feces.telic wrote:Do you realize that poisoned rats can produce blue feces?
tommyj12 wrote: If you bought a new house would you leave things the way they were or how you want them.
This is exactly the point I am getting at... Linux users always come up with this argument of "well you can change it", but thats not good enough. You cant show someone around your house and say "well you can change it" as an excuse for not bothering to make it look nice before selling. You will get less interest in the property if you do that, and the exact same is true with Linux. People need to go "Wow! that is beautiful" not "Meh, well I can change it laters".
Users browsing this forum: Alexa [Bot] and 2 guests