Binary programs on Linux

Chat about Linux in general

Binary programs on Linux

Postby phil on Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:41 pm

There seems to be a trend going that appeals to me. We have several of the most important add on programs taking the lead in this direction. The latest I have had experience with is Google Earth installed on Mint 7 XFCE. I downloaded it from the Google site rather than the Mint install version. It is performing flawlessly. I am also running the newest version of Google Earth on my dual boot XP. In fact I am running Open Office and Firefox 3.5 on the same dual boot computer, same versions on both OSs that are almost 10 years different in age..

Is there any real reason to have a lot of libraries and other dependencies for programs that are continuously changing and being recompiled? Do we save disk space? What is the reason? Is it a holdover from the way it was done before?

I am still running XP-SP3 updated, but I am able to use programs that were written 10 years ago and even some of the old DOS programs that are over 20 years old without a problem. I am an engineer that uses CAD and because of competitive fighting involving AutoDesk, Intellicad and Microsoft I must still use XP. But it has taught me something. I can still do the same job for my clients with my Intellicad 2001 as Autocad 2009 or my Key Cad V. 3.0 licensed from Microsoft before 1998. Yes, the bells and whistles vary but it is possible to do most work with any of them, however they all require Microsoft OSs. I think that is changing because Intellicad is reputed to be getting around the required licensing of their product from Microsoft. by reprogramming for cross platform use just like Google and Sun.

I have discussed this with government building departments and they tell me that the continuing changes are forcing them to use paper in their files. And by the way I back everything up on paper and have my files for the last 30 years of my engineering work and some from 50 years ago. Yea, that dates me. I became a registered Engineer in Colorado in 1955.

Six month release cycles do not bother me. I just want the programs to still run after I reinstall them on the new OS version or on an older one for that matter.
13 Xfce, Win XP, GA-MA785GM-US2h, Athlon II X2 240, 4G mem, OCZ SSD, WD 230G, nVidia 210
13 Xfce, Win XP, N68C-5, Athlon II X2 255, 4G mem, OCZ SSD, WD 120G, nVidia 7025
13 Xfce, Win XP, N68C-5, Athlon II X2 250, 4G mem, OCZ SSD, WD 1T, nVidia 7025
phil
Level 3
Level 3
 
Posts: 142
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 12:46 pm
Location: Consejo, Belize, Central America

Linux Mint is funded by ads and donations.
 

Re: Binary programs on Linux

Postby grimdestripador on Fri Sep 04, 2009 4:09 pm

You can thank monopolies using their leveraging power to make new open file standards that accomplish the same as the old ones, but in new non-open ways, thus you must purchase the new application to read both new and old, all while they promise it will work in the future do to its open nature. Confusing? Its meant to be.
User avatar
grimdestripador
Level 6
Level 6
 
Posts: 1069
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 2:26 am

Re: Binary programs on Linux

Postby phil on Fri Sep 04, 2009 6:42 pm

So true.
13 Xfce, Win XP, GA-MA785GM-US2h, Athlon II X2 240, 4G mem, OCZ SSD, WD 230G, nVidia 210
13 Xfce, Win XP, N68C-5, Athlon II X2 255, 4G mem, OCZ SSD, WD 120G, nVidia 7025
13 Xfce, Win XP, N68C-5, Athlon II X2 250, 4G mem, OCZ SSD, WD 1T, nVidia 7025
phil
Level 3
Level 3
 
Posts: 142
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 12:46 pm
Location: Consejo, Belize, Central America


Return to Chat about Linux

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests