Amarok 2.0 beta

All Gurus once were Newbies
Forum rules
There are no such things as "stupid" questions. However if you think your question is a bit stupid, then this is the right place for you to post it. Please stick to easy to-the-point questions that you feel people can answer fast. For long and complicated questions prefer the other forums within the support section.
Before you post please read this

Amarok 2.0 beta

Postby locutus on Fri Aug 22, 2008 7:10 pm

Beta of Amarok 2 was released today, but it needs KDE 4.1, which as far as I can tell is not in our repositories. Also requires taglib v1.5, but only v1.4 is in the repositories. I'd love to see how it works but it looks like a lot of work getting Mint ready.

Is it worth the effort? Does KDE 4.1 have to be running or just installed? That is, can I run KDE 3.5.9 and still get Amarok 2.0 working?

Your thoughts would be appreciated.
User avatar
locutus
Level 4
Level 4
 
Posts: 406
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 4:54 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

Linux Mint is funded by ads and donations.
 

Re: Amarok 2.0 beta

Postby msuggs on Fri Aug 22, 2008 7:20 pm

You'll have to install the necessary 4.1 libraries to run Amarok 2.0. I'm not sure if it would then run within a 3.5.9 environment. Can't see why not. There is a thread on the forums somewhere on trying 4.1 using the kubuntu repos.
msuggs
Level 5
Level 5
 
Posts: 882
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 8:25 am
Location: non-local

Re: Amarok 2.0 beta

Postby msuggs on Fri Aug 22, 2008 7:22 pm

Here tis

viewtopic.php?f=109&t=15387#p94561

I'd try adding the 4.1 repos then just installing amaroK 2.0
msuggs
Level 5
Level 5
 
Posts: 882
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 8:25 am
Location: non-local

Re: Amarok 2.0 beta

Postby locutus on Fri Aug 22, 2008 9:05 pm

omns wrote:I'd try adding the 4.1 repos then just installing amaroK 2.0


Yep, that worked. And I like it better than Amarok 1.4: there's no lag between clicking on a song and it starting to play; it's instant. Interestingly, I'm running it in the 3.5.9 enviorment, yet when I click Help -> About there are two options, Amarok and KDE. If I select KDE it says I'm running 4.1, not 3.5.9. Obviously has to do with the needed background files, but still it was kinda odd that it didn't pick up that I wasn't running KDE 4.1.

But it works great, if anyone else is interested.
User avatar
locutus
Level 4
Level 4
 
Posts: 406
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 4:54 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re: Amarok 2.0 beta

Postby Google Spider on Sat Aug 23, 2008 9:18 am

Thanks! :)
Google Spider
Level 2
Level 2
 
Posts: 86
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 10:45 am

Re: Amarok 2.0 beta

Postby msuggs on Sat Aug 23, 2008 4:50 pm

locutus wrote:Yep, that worked. And I like it better than Amarok 1.4


Glad to know it worked out :) I've just started using amaroK 1.4 again after some time and am impressed by how far it has evolved. I might give this a try myself :)
msuggs
Level 5
Level 5
 
Posts: 882
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 8:25 am
Location: non-local

Re: Amarok 2.0 beta

Postby msuggs on Sat Aug 23, 2008 8:03 pm

Uh yuck, the user interface is awful. I'm sure it will improve over time but it's not for me yet... sigh

Looks like 1.4 for me at the moment :)
msuggs
Level 5
Level 5
 
Posts: 882
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 8:25 am
Location: non-local

Re: Amarok 2.0 beta

Postby CaptainTux on Sat Aug 23, 2008 9:20 pm

omns wrote:Uh yuck, the user interface is awful. I'm sure it will improve over time but it's not for me yet... sigh

Looks like 1.4 for me at the moment :)

It's a early beta.

I have a test sled for bleeding edge goodies like this. I plug in the sled, boot up...it has gentoo on it...emerge whatever bleeding edge thingy the new thingy wants and do everything I can to break it.

For experimentation I prefer customized distros like gentoo and debian unstable on a non production hard drive or machine.
The greatest glory in living lies not in never falling, but in rising every time we fall.
-Nelson Mandela
User avatar
CaptainTux
Level 1
Level 1
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:24 pm
Location: SW of Chicago, Illinois

Re: Amarok 2.0 beta

Postby msuggs on Sat Aug 23, 2008 10:23 pm

CaptainTux wrote:It's a early beta.



Yes, I'm well aware of that. My comment related to the interface as it stands at the moment.
Last edited by msuggs on Sun Aug 24, 2008 3:13 am, edited 2 times in total.
msuggs
Level 5
Level 5
 
Posts: 882
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 8:25 am
Location: non-local

Re: Amarok 2.0 beta

Postby CaptainTux on Sat Aug 23, 2008 10:51 pm

Ah. No disagreement here.
The greatest glory in living lies not in never falling, but in rising every time we fall.
-Nelson Mandela
User avatar
CaptainTux
Level 1
Level 1
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:24 pm
Location: SW of Chicago, Illinois

Linux Mint is funded by ads and donations.
 

Return to Newbie Questions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Rita G. and 21 guests