




npap wrote:What, may I ask, is your opinion about Mint?










Fred wrote:.....
Mint has a secrete weapon that other small distributions don't have. His Name is Husse. I believe he has been key to Mint's success to date. Without him the atmosphere of the forum would not be what it is. He works many hours a week, every week, in the forum helping users and maintaining the helpful atmosphere that prevails here. He also spends many hours behind the scenes researching issues for users, working on the wiki, putting out a news letter, blogging, taking pressing issues to the developers, etc. I honestly don't see how he does all he does and still finds time to earn a living for his family. The single biggest reason you can can come to this forum and expect helpful, courteous treatment is Husse and the work he does here.
Remember that and thank him once in a while. That is the only reward he gets for his efforts.
Fred



npap wrote:Hello everyone,
It might be useful to ask Oceanwatcher how many items on his wish list in the link below have been implemented in Mint.![]()
http://www.linuxmint.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=18319
Cheers,
npap

npap wrote:Hello everyone,
It might be useful to ask Oceanwatcher how many items on his wish list in the link below have been implemented in Mint.![]()


npap wrote:Hello everyone,
It might be useful to ask Oceanwatcher how many items on his wish list in the link below have been implemented in Mint.![]()
viewtopic.php?t=18319
Cheers,
npap
FedoraRefugee wrote:If that was directed at me then you'd be better off to ask qbcdesign:
http://linuxmint.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=18365
I dont think he liked me very much.But that is my whole point. The thread was allowed to continue and we were both able to express our points of view. He might have been a bit disgusted at me but that is his problem, life went on and no one got hurt. Maybe in the end we can both learn something from each other. Isnt that what it is supposed to be about?


Fred wrote:npap,
I really don't think you want me to go through those suggestions and tell you what I think of each of them.
Fred



npap wrote:Well, I was wrong!![]()
Having followed the evolution of Mint since Barbara, I once predicted that it would be a great success, reaching 5th place on Distrowatch. Now, I can't believe my eyes to see it clime to the third place.![]()
What is it that made me a Mint addict?![]()
1) Participation of the community: Requests for special features, suggestions to make Mint better.
2) The feeling that we, the community, participated.
3) The fact that it was not a project developed by payed professionals but by an ambitious dreamer.
4) Finally, the ambition of Mint to be friendly to all users; gurus or newbies.
What, may I ask, is your opinion about Mint?
Congratulations and thanks to all of the Mint group.![]()
Greetings,
npap
The Mint Girl


Katzedecimal wrote:I came to Mint as a n00b, for a variety of reasons that I won't get into here. One of them, however, was a desire to regain control and understanding of my computer system and regain my long-lost status of compu-geek (I was one, a long time ago.) Mint was the only distro that I got fired up and working straight out of the 'box.' Once into the pool, I found it very comfortable and stable and I quickly settled into it as my regular system.
The others are right in that the community here on the forum is a large part of the "Mint Experience." Mint as a distro has a huge potential for smoothing the Linux learning curve, but the people here, like Fred, FedoraRefugee, Exploder, and of course the incredible Husse, are unusually patient and willing to hold the hands of us n00bs and babystep us through the curves. Combined with the shallower learning curve of Mint, the willing n00b can learn to swim with a minimum of drowningThat's why Sarah and I are on the Mint ra-ra squad, as the 'we did it; you can too!' support for n00bs



almigi"
Anyone remember the old Apple IIs? Not only could you use AppleSoft BASIC, but if you knew how, you could enter "CALL -151" to enter the system monitor and even write hexadecimal code. Which while not useful for programming from scratch, it meant that those magazines and books full of BASIC programs could include more complex programs that could be entered directly into the computer without the need for an assembler. Of course, once in the system monitor, you could even invoke the built in Apple II miniassembler, which allowed very basic assembly language programming (but no high end features found in commercial assemblers). Do you remember how if you had a modem connected to your computer, even without a terminal program, just entering a few commands at the wrote:" prompt put you in terminal mode? Granted, it was a dumb terminal with no file xfer features, and you actually had to know how to talk to your modem via AT commands, but it worked! Just "ATDT <bbs phone number>" and whola (assuming there was no busy signal).
Just my $0.02.




Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests