Why Linux will not displace Windows
Forum rules
Do not post support questions here. Before you post read the forum rules. Topics in this forum are automatically closed 30 days after creation.
Do not post support questions here. Before you post read the forum rules. Topics in this forum are automatically closed 30 days after creation.
Why Linux will not displace Windows
RedJak ,
All is fine but the code is a little too complicated for newbies to follow.
All is fine but the code is a little too complicated for newbies to follow.
Code: Select all
clem@pluto:# cat recurse; recurse
recurse
Why Linux will not displace Windows
Cussing and re-cussing will never drive any spirits away. Sorp with his stingers might.
Why Linux will not displace Windows
LINUX IS A THINKING MAN'S OS!
A SMART LADY'S CHOICE!
Interactive, exciting, and versatile.
A SMART LADY'S CHOICE!
Interactive, exciting, and versatile.
Re: Why Linux will not displace Windows
And the relation to Linux Mint is ... ? NAMMO < > MINT ???npap wrote:There couldn't be anything more recursive than this one:
NAMMO =NIPSON ANOMIMATA MI MONAN OPSIN Ιt can be read backwards! (The original: ΝΙΨΟΝΑΝΟΜΙΜΑΤΑΜΙΜΟΝΑΝΟΨΙΝ)
Why Linux will not displace Windows
Good morning Scorp,
It's just another peculiar, recursive anagram. But NAMMO means: Linux is not NAMMO: Not Another Mysterious, Mad OS
BTW, I have Personalized Google and I have, among other topics, the Google Note Book. I found the following message which I didn't put there. How could it have been written there. By Whom? Could somebody have access to my desktop?
Message:
Articles By Clement Lefebvre in Linux Forums
http://www.linuxforums.org/bio/author/Clement+Lefebvre/
It's just another peculiar, recursive anagram. But NAMMO means: Linux is not NAMMO: Not Another Mysterious, Mad OS
BTW, I have Personalized Google and I have, among other topics, the Google Note Book. I found the following message which I didn't put there. How could it have been written there. By Whom? Could somebody have access to my desktop?
Message:
Articles By Clement Lefebvre in Linux Forums
http://www.linuxforums.org/bio/author/Clement+Lefebvre/
Why Linux will not displace Windows
A good idea Ken,
But I'm afraid he would be partial.
A review on one's own work might be a little hard to do.
But I'm afraid he would be partial.
A review on one's own work might be a little hard to do.
Why Linux will not displace Windows
Poetic License gives you the opportunity to look less subjective.
All writers use a pseudonym (see, I know some Greek too )
Kadiddlehopper is a very good American name.
All writers use a pseudonym (see, I know some Greek too )
Kadiddlehopper is a very good American name.
Why Linux will not displace Windows
Oh boy, that's Red Skelton. Isn't he? How about Jackie Gleason?
Mint Is Non- Terrestrial
Mint Is Non- Terrestrial
I disagree. OpenSUSE 10.2 isn't bad at all (10.1 was horrible BS though). I won't go into too many details here, but SUSE 10.2 is one of the finest distros available right now. It would be nice for Mint if we had some of SUSE's features, e.g. "Yast". Or the desktop polish that SUSE comes with out of the box.kenetics wrote:Hey, that fellow seems to know what he's talking about. He was spot on in his review of OpenSUSE.
I think Clem liked everything but the package manager. It's one of the distros I have on my computer and it's very professional. I had my share of problems with Yast. It took a number of tries before I could even connect to the repositories and update. Everything seems a bit slow, but with a faster computer it would probably be ok. I can see why experienced Linux users would like it.scorp123 wrote:I disagree. OpenSUSE 10.2 isn't bad at all (10.1 was horrible BS though). I won't go into too many details here, but SUSE 10.2 is one of the finest distros available right now. It would be nice for Mint if we had some of SUSE's features, e.g. "Yast". Or the desktop polish that SUSE comes with out of the box.kenetics wrote:Hey, that fellow seems to know what he's talking about. He was spot on in his review of OpenSUSE.
Well ... you have to know how to set it up properly. And using alternative + complimentary package managers such as "smart" or even "apt" (= apt4rpm) is not that hard. However I agree that things such as "smart" should come pre-configured and ready-to-be-used out of the box ... but unfortunately they aren't. But as I said ... it's not that hard.kenetics wrote:I think Clem liked everything but the package manager.