Microsofts counterattack

Chat about Linux in general
Forum rules
Do not post support questions here. Before you post read the forum rules. Topics in this forum are automatically closed 6 months after creation.
Locked
scorp123
Level 8
Level 8
Posts: 2272
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 4:19 pm
Location: Switzerland

Re: Microsofts counterattack

Post by scorp123 »

sco wrote: Interesting, disturbing ...
Nonsense, FUD.
I was cricised many times for my overly harsh tone, but now I can't hold back: What moron wrote that article?? Look at the date! When you open that URL Firefox's window title bar will claim that today is "May 28, 2007" ... Excuse me? Unless I missed the last two weeks and spent them in coma or some Pope in Rome changed the calendar system again (as Gregor XIII did in 1582 with the then-in-use Julian Calendar ... and all calendar dates went fast-forward ... Please tell me that this didn't happen again and I completely missed it ??? :? ) today is still May 14, 2007 ... and not May 28. Also, let's analyse the last part of the URL: ".... fortune_archive/2007/05/28 ... " <== there you go again: "2007/05/28".

Sorry, but I can't take this nonsense serious if they can't even get the date right.

Besides, most parts of the world don't recognize software patents even to be valid, so Microsoft's managers can throw around chairs and dance around as much as they want, it won't have any influence whatsoever. :D
scorp123
Level 8
Level 8
Posts: 2272
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 4:19 pm
Location: Switzerland

Post by scorp123 »

Groklaw has the proper answer to this Microsoft nonsense:

http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?stor ... 3234519615
User avatar
clem
Level 12
Level 12
Posts: 4303
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 8:34 am
Contact:

Post by clem »

I don't believe in patents, never have never will. Somebody please explain to me how an idea can belong to someone.

Clem
Image
scorp123
Level 8
Level 8
Posts: 2272
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 4:19 pm
Location: Switzerland

Post by scorp123 »

clem wrote:I don't believe in patents, never have never will. Somebody please explain to me how an idea can belong to someone.
Well ... a new idea implemented in a real piece of hardware is one thing ... But software algorithms? What is software? Ultimately it's adding and subtracting 1's and 0's ... In other words: Software = Mathematics. It's a fact. There are very good reasons why most countries on this planet don't recognize software patents to be valid. It's plain silly nonsense. Company A has the right to calculate 1 + 3 = 4 because they have a patent on this, and company B who came up with 2 + 2 = 4 is now at risk of being sued because their result is 4 too? That's what software patents are about. A software patent claims some kind of "innovation" because feeding registers in a calculating machine (= a computer!) with a few bits and bytes spits out a certain result ... And God forbid you obtain the same result by doing some calculations and shifting a few bits and bytes of your own ...

As I said. It's nonsense. Most countries don't recognize software patents being valid at all.

And according to some postings I read over at Groklaw even under US law Microsoft's chance of winning are very dim. US law knows such interesting concepts such as "prior art" and "the laches doctrine" (= if you wait too long with a patent law suit you lose your rights to the patent in question!) ... So until then this is all FUD, FUD, FUD.
User avatar
clem
Level 12
Level 12
Posts: 4303
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 8:34 am
Contact:

Post by clem »

In my opinion you shouldn't be able to patent anything.

Clem
Image
User avatar
bigbearomaha
Level 3
Level 3
Posts: 178
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:34 am
Location: Omaha, NE

Post by bigbearomaha »

I can see patenting a product.

But they want to patent a result.

for example, If someone did invent said orange juice powered fan, ok, no problem. it's a unique device that will sell or not on it's own merits.

BUT to try to patent the said fan and tell someone else sorry , you can't sell your tomato juice powered fan because it's too close to my product. Well that's just a way to prevent competition and force everyone to buy your fan even if it's built like crap.

also, when a MS tries to patent said fan, they aren't trying to patent an orange juice fan. They go for the gusto and try to patent juice powered fans. encompassing any fans powered by any juice.

The fact that the gov't allows such broad patents is ridiculous.

now in the case of software, even though it's not a material product, it serves a unique, usable purpose so they have to "pretend" as though it were a physical device in order to give it equal coverage.

But again, MS didn't want to patent the Microsoft Office Suite, it just went to the patent office and said, " we want to patent the office suite"

very general and vague.

It's devious and underhanded to ask for but it's plain idiotic to grant.

Big Bear
User avatar
900i
Level 6
Level 6
Posts: 1142
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 9:30 am
Location: Wakefield, UK

Post by 900i »

Like was said in 2004 "MS put up or shut up". Only the misinformed believe any of the rubbish that comes out of Redmond, unfortunately thats the vast majority of PC users.
Desktop Core i7 Linux Mint 21.1 / Laptop Dell Precision M6400 Linux Mint 21.1
scorp123
Level 8
Level 8
Posts: 2272
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 4:19 pm
Location: Switzerland

Post by scorp123 »

Linus responds: "It's more likely that MS violates patents ..."
http://www.informationweek.com/news/sho ... =199600443

And last but not least: Show us the code!
http://showusthecode.com/
scorp123
Level 8
Level 8
Posts: 2272
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 4:19 pm
Location: Switzerland

Post by scorp123 »

D1Wayne wrote:my fealings regarding this is seen in about 8secs into this capture :D
My feelings for that M$ employee who came up with this license nonsense is best explained by this web site ... :D
http://piv.pivpiv.dk/
scorp123
Level 8
Level 8
Posts: 2272
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 4:19 pm
Location: Switzerland

Post by scorp123 »

My response to that Microsoft guy in the interview: :D
http://piv.pivpiv.dk/

It's still FUD and total nonsense. :D
scorp123
Level 8
Level 8
Posts: 2272
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 4:19 pm
Location: Switzerland

Post by scorp123 »

rerushg wrote: Well, I'm not so sure.
I guess you should read more then? e.g. Groklaw?
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?stor ... 8124020691

Microsoft's nonsense about their patents is just that: nonsense.

And besides, according to that Groklaw article I linked to, it looks like that with the help of GPLv3 their once so sweet Novell deal will badly backfire :twisted:

Quote taken from Groklaw:

".... Microsoft is a distributor already under GPLv2, because of distributing the vouchers and some other unstated things FSF's Brett Smith hinted at when he stated the FSF view. So there is already a defense, thanks to GPLv2's implied patent license. But under GPLv3, it's not implied. Here is precisely what happens to Microsoft when someone hands in a voucher after the GPLv3 is in effect:

If, pursuant to or in connection with a single transaction or arrangement, you convey, or propagate by procuring conveyance of, a covered work, and grant a patent license providing freedom to use, propagate, modify or convey a specific copy of the covered work to any of the parties receiving the covered work, then the patent license you grant is automatically extended to all recipients of the covered work and works based on it.

No wonder, as Moglen puts it, Microsoft has been tossing the vouchers wholesale out of airplanes "as though the coupons themselves were hot, as indeed they are". But now here comes Moglen saying even that won't work, because of the lack of an expiration date on the vouchers. And so, as the sun sets over the horizon, we may be bidding a fond farewell to Microsoft's patent bullying. I hope some friendly folks have bought a voucher. If so, you might just want to take a breather before you turn it in, huh? Then it's buh-bye to Microsoft's 235 patent claims, methinks. So nice of Microsoft to distribute under GPLv3. Hugs and kisses. ..."

Read again: Microsoft overlooked plenty of things. As soon as GPLv3 becomes active (and many open source projects are licensed as "GPL v2 or later", meaning that most stuff will auto-switch to GPLv3 !!) all their patents, regardless if trivial BS or not, become useless, because Microsoft too will be a distributor under GPLv3.
rerushg wrote: The American public accepts patent and copyright laws as "given" and meaningful to individual rights.
Well, good thing then that America doesn't rule over most parts of the world, huh? :twisted:

Why I say this? American copyright laws and patents only apply to the USA and have no meaning and no value or validity in most other parts of the world :D

It's as simple as that. Even if Microsoft were to win in a bizarre and twisted parallel Universe: they could only enforce their stupid claims in the USA. In that case Linux would return to its roots in the USA: It would again become an underground project people would have to secretly download from the Internet ... And that's it.

Even in that pervert and twisted parallel Universe Microsoft winning their patent claims would have no effect whatsoever in e.g. Europe. :D
rerushg wrote: I agree with the general consenus that MS will likely not pursue patent litigation.
Even if they did ... :D Read above: They can't do anything to stop Linux. Folks in the USA would download it secretly then; all further Linux development would then focus on Europe, Africa and Asia.

Microsoft winning their patent lawsuit would be totally disastrous for the USA :D
rerushg wrote: Linux has grown to the point that it is virtually uncontrollable by mere litigation.
Please when was Linux ever "controllable" by "mere litigation" ??? :D :D :D It never was. That's the wonderful part about it. If Microsoft would have been able to kill Linux by litigation or other dirty tricks, don't you think they would have done that long time ago?
rerushg wrote: Now consider the "Patriot Act", under which incredibly massive data mining has been done ... We are told the data has been distroyed. Okay, maybe so. How about the ANALYSIS of that data? Where is that?
And you call yourselves "Land of the Free" ??? :D Wouldn't you agree with me that this is a total sarcastic joke?? :twisted: Do you really think you are "free" ? I don't think so. :D
rerushg wrote: What if the analysis can be spun to show that "..unlicensed software and OS's are a fundamental tool of international terrorism..."?
And then what? Invade Finnland? :D Invade Germany, for SUSE originates from there? Invade South Africa for Ubuntu is from there? Invade China for they produce their own Linux variant known as "Red Flag"? Invade Thailand and India and Pakistan, for they produce their own Linux variants too? :D

Good luck with that. Your military will be very busy the next 2000 years or so :D
rerushg wrote: "privatization of the internet"
(Note: Sarcasm levels at 100% ...) That would be great !!!!!! :D :D :D That would mean that USA forks off their parts of the Internet and the rest of the world would then be free of spam!! (70% or so of all spam mails originate in the USA ...). I suggest we Europeans call our part "EuroNet" or something like that, link it up with Asia and Africa and let our economies prosper whereas the Americans may enjoy their DRM- and patent-infested small bubble of the Internet ...
rerushg wrote: Perhaps MS is developing the software mechanisms that will assure the government that the objectives of the laws can be met. Perhaps MS is therefore entitled to own those mechanisms. Hmmmmmm.
I hope you will enjoy your small Internet bubble then. If the USA cuts off their parts of the Internet and places it under MS rule than this would also mean that Microsoft's web sites are not reachable anymore from Europe. Yipppieeeh. 400+ million new Linux users: All the people currently using Windows would be unable to continue using this OS as they won't be able to reach the update servers anymore. They would be looking for alternatives and switch to Linux.

And the EU would then of course declare Microsoft a criminal organisation (such DRM software probably wouldn't sit well with the EU commissions ...) and outlaw all this Microsoft stuff on European soil. How wonderful! :D
rerushg wrote: while the real demise of Desktop Linux is been formulated behind closed doors somewhere.
This is impossible as you hopefully realise by now. No matter what they do. They cannot "stop" Linux :wink: They can force vendors such as Dell or HP to stop ditributing Linux pre-installed on their products, sure ... But that still isn't the "demise" of desktop Linux, people can still download it if they want to :D If you're too afraid I suggest you use a friendly European server :wink:
scorp123
Level 8
Level 8
Posts: 2272
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 4:19 pm
Location: Switzerland

Post by scorp123 »

rerushg wrote: And I'm reasonably well informed on the subject matter. Unlike in, say, China, Germany, or France I can Google anything I want here. :)
France? Germany? Don't be ridiculous. :lol:

Europe in general is far (!!!) from being even in the same ballpark like communist China, where people face the firing squad just because they opened their mouth. :roll:

Unless I'm missing something here I don't have the impression right now that you're "well informed", my dear :D

And as for freedoms: Can you walk in your street and drink beer although you're only 16 and not 21? We can. When we turn 16 we can buy ourselves beer if we want. Real beer like Heineken, Amstel, Tuborg, Hoegaarden, Franziskaner, with real 3% to 8% of alcohol in them. Don't like beer? Fine, take a Vodka then. Or one of those Baccardi or Smirnoff mixtures you can buy here in every ordinary supermarket. Do you have to "brown-bag" your alcoholic beverage? We don't. And we don't have more alcoholism or alcohol abusers here than other similarly developed countries.

Can you vote with 18? We can. For with 18 we are considered fully adult ... and not only with 21 like you people :wink: ... How many political parties do you have that you can choose from? Two: Republicans and Democrats; maybe independent candidates here and there, but that's it. We don't have limits regarding the number of parties that may or may not exist. Heck, you can even vote for the communists if you feel like it. Or the socialists. Or the populist right-wing parties. Vote as you wish.

Can you walk down a street while smoking a joint without being at risk that the police will drag you in prison? We can.

Do you think that any politician or official in the USA will face any consequences for collecting all that data you mentioned in your previous post? Here they would. Something like the "Patriot Act" where your own police spy on the ordinary citizen without search warrant is simply impossible here and if anything like that were to become known it would cost someone's political career.

Do you face jail and extreme monetary fines way out of any proportion if you are caught owning illegal copies of copyrighted material? Yes you do. Thanks to the "DMCA - Digital Millennium Copyright Act". I don't. I can copy what I want, for as long as I make no monetary profit of that it is not considered "piracy". I can walk down the street and brag with my MP3 collection and hold it under the nose of a police officer ... The biggest risk for me would be that he too wants a few copies of some favourite songs. No monetary fines, no jail time. Please try that in the USA ... :lol: :lol: :lol:

Nope my dear, you are not free at the moment, thanks to Bush and his minions and their bizarre creations such as the "Patriot Act" and the soon to be introduced update to the DMCA (250'000 dollars monetary fine + 10 years of jail time if they catch you copying stuff ...). As a fact: you are not really free right now.

BTW, Having your own secret services spy on you without legal ground (= "Patriot Act") is pretty far away from the concept of freedom as I understand it; and sadly: This totally is in the same ballpark like China!
rerushg wrote: Windows bashing
Windows is a pile of sh** and it deserves to be bashed. Sorry about that, but Windows and Microsoft products in general do absolutely nothing for me. The overall design is totally flawed in my professional opinion as IT admin and Windows as OS is per design bound to get seriously broken at some point ... which is totally braindead. Why do you design an OS that will break so easily if you give it some serious workload? Why is it so easy to get around all those pathetic security measures? Why are so many unwanted and undesirable network services running? Why are those services running under the "administrator" account and with full priviledges? Why aren't they turning those idiotic services off -- per default?? Heck no: Instead they ship that idiotic excuse of a firewall that wouldn't be needed in the first place if Windows had a sane design and those stupid services were turned off! Sorry, but I can't help but bash Windows. It's total crapware. And that after so many years of development Vista is the best they could come up with ... oh please. :roll:

The newest funny thing I heard about the upcomming "Windows Server 2008" is that they want to create a "Core Server Version" that won't have a built-in GUI but be "command line only". LOL. No thanks Microsoft, nice try though ... :wink:
rerushg wrote: or America bashing, or rerushg bashing
I am not bashing America, and I am not bashing you. Keep cool, chill out. It's just my observation that since beginning of the Bush era you people have gone on a weird path that ultimately had to lead to the war in Iraq, to the de facto invasion of Afghanistan, to the "Patriot Act", and many other absurdities. Instead of solving the problems e.g. in the Middle East which lead to the 9-11 attacks in the first place, Bush isn't helping at all in this question but instead made even more enemies ... And now they are all looking for an "exit strategy" ?? :roll: Maybe it would have been intelligent not to get involved in a war in the first place? :wink:

And as for "bashing" you: Nope. I am just trying to open your eyes a little. You should travel more I guess. Or maybe go and work and/or study abroad for a year or so. It broadens the horizon and adds new perspectives :wink:
scorp123
Level 8
Level 8
Posts: 2272
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 4:19 pm
Location: Switzerland

Post by scorp123 »

rerushg wrote:
scorp123 wrote:France? Germany? Don't be ridiculous. :lol:
Well, I won't confuse you any further with facts.
Well, maybe it would help if you explained what you mean?? :wink: You see, it's videos like this one (and plenty of sad personal experience with people in the US company I worked for until very recently) that makes us Europeans believe that you Americans have a bit a limited view of the world:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJuNgBkloFE

I know I know I know ... it's a stereotype. But then again, could you explain what you mean with "Germany and France", yes? :wink:
rerushg wrote: building a 35 ft. sailboat
Now, that's cool 8)
rerushg wrote: spending 20 years in corporate America
Well, I'm kinda disappointed with "corporate America". Having worked for a US-based company in the past seven years I have come to the conclusion that US management schools produce lots of really weird people :? ... Oh well, read here in another post:
http://www.linuxmint.com/forum/viewtopi ... 7814#17814


Seems I'm not the only one here with such experiences? ... judging from Husse's comment:
http://www.linuxmint.com/forum/viewtopi ... 7860#17860
rerushg wrote: being involved in two patent violation litigations,
Well, as I said. US patents and its weird (from an European perspective) patent system are confined to the US, and you can believe me that the last thing we want here is something like the DMCA or an US-style patent system.
rerushg wrote: I only needed to know one thing: Windows is sh**.
Look at the facts, please. You don't have to take my word for it, you can check this stuff yourself, e.g. by following discussions in newsgroups about network security, by checking the many postings e.g. in the SysInternals forums, and so on.

Also: Please let's use logic. Just look at the software market today! Examples:

How many anti-virus toolkits do exist? Right off my memory these come to my mind: Avast, Symantec, Norton, F-Prot, PC-Ciline, Defender, AntiVir, ... How can Windows not be a seriously flawed product if it's flaws are so big that there is a market for such products?? A well-designed product should not be vulnerable to so many viruses in the first place I guess?

How many "PC maintenance" tools do exist? The good old "Norton Utilities" and "PC Tools" for MS-DOS come to my mind. The number of such toolkits has grown considerably since the age of MS-DOS. Now we have the "Fix-It Utilities", we still have something called "PC Tools" according to Google, we have Paragon's "System Recovery" and all the other dozen of tools they produce, we have Symantec, and last but not least there is a huge market for computer magazines which boast titles such as "Repair your Windows registry now!", "Speed up Windows!", "Tune your Windows to the max", and so on. Just go to a news stand and see for yourself. Don't you have to ask yourself how deeply flawed and broken Windows must be if there is such a huge market for thousands of "maintenance toolkits" and "tuning utilities", "registry cleaners" and other such software? I'd assume that a well-designed OS has all such tools on-board already? With Linux for example (and yes, I agree: I'm totally biased towards it) you need not to bother about buying such tool packages, all the tools you might ever need are already there in the OS.

Also: I'd further assume that a well-designed OS doesn't auto-cripple itself over time? Fact is the longer you use a Windows installation the slower and the more crippled it gets (there are many forums full of such stories), leading to its user either assuming that they need a new computer, or that they need some sort of "repair toolkit" of sorts, or that the problem might go away again when they do a full reinstallation ... :? There are no such problems with UNIX-like operating systems: You can use them day in and day out, install, reinstall and remove software, upgrade packages, compile stuff, do development, serve web pages, host databases ... Such a system won't come to a crawling halt over time just because you used it. So how can Windows not be junk?

Last but not least, I think these advertisements from Apple are spot-on:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-7C-w8jc0w
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PxLgBx3W9Ss
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sfCHuVrWHPk
User avatar
clem
Level 12
Level 12
Posts: 4303
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 8:34 am
Contact:

Post by clem »

I don't think it makes sense to compare countries on the level of freedom they give to their citizens. The reason is: it's hard to quantify.

You might think there's more freedom in France than in the US. The truth is, there's less social pressure, less bullshit and the market doesn't have a hold on your personal freedom. Having said that, France doesn't let you encrypt your data (you can in the US), France doesn't let you talk freely about what you want (you can in the US), France doesn't let you buy guns, redbull, good satellite receivers etc etc.. (you can in the US).

I'm not saying it's good for a society to let its citizens say everything they think and have guns in their house, but if you want to compare individual freedom between two countries you have to take this into account. Personal freedom is nice to the individual, it's not necessarily a good thing for a nation.

The US have regulated the use of software patents and this is the issue we're talking about here. There's no need to spit on China or the US or any other country cause they don't know how to cook rice or how to implement free speech.

Anyway.. personal freedom sucks. Look at them, they all run Windows! If only there was a legislation to make them use Linux :lol:

Note: I agree with the fact that the US is just the US and that what happens to US legislation doesn't affect the rest of the World or the Internet. This is the case for software patents for instance. However, keep in mind that on the Web, the US represent grossly 50% of our Web traffic, 50% of our donations and I assume 50% of our user base. So for a project like Linux Mint, the US is not just a country among others... it's half of its community. This is very important IMHO.

Clem
Image
Husse

Post by Husse »

I think we should close this thread now. Any other moderator should feel free to open it :)
scorp123
Level 8
Level 8
Posts: 2272
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 4:19 pm
Location: Switzerland

Post by scorp123 »

clem wrote: Having said that, France doesn't let you encrypt your data (you can in the US),
Not 100% precise :wink: There was an old and relatively stupid law that restricted encryption strength to 40-bit. But as far as I know they have abolished that law as nobody was abiding by it anyway. And they never checked us foreigners, although they could have easily guessed that all the equipment I carry with me (laptop, WLAN card, etc.) was very well capable of encryption way beyong their 40-bit limit.
clem wrote: France doesn't let you talk freely about what you want (you can in the US)
That's a bit of a generalisation and simplification. If you want to express e.g. your political or religious views, nobody is going to stop you, not in France, and not in Germany or elsewhere. However, if your religious or political views are about gassing Jews, wiping out Israel, mass murder of a specified ethnic minority, hatred, racism, <violates forum rules> and such then they will stop you -- and rightly so IMHO. Freedom of speech is a nice thing, but there are limits. One such limit is e.g. when it starts hurting others or threatens to hurt others. So yes, Neo-<violates forum rules> and ultra-right wing racists, Holocaust deniers and other such braindead idiots are indeed being censored and stopped in their tracks when they open their mouths. But I don't see this as a "problem". The last thing we need is to give such idiots a platform where they can (again !!?) express their bizarre views and spread their hatred into the world.
clem wrote: France doesn't let you buy guns
I don't really think that France is in need of a gun culture? :wink: Given how hot-headed you French folks can be it's maybe a good thing that buying guns in France is not so easy? :wink:

We Swiss each have our fully automatic Army guns at home so we are not really in need to buy additional guns ... we already have too many anyway. Other than that the purchase of guns is heavily restricted here. And this is not a bad thing.

And right now discussions are underway to have these guns stored in depots (as is the case in other countries) instead of private homes: too many weird things have happened recently, e.g. some crazy guys walking into restaurants and shooting people.

If you consider what happened recently in the USA with that crazy guy shooting so many students not having a "gun culture" is probably a good thing.
clem wrote: redbull, good satellite receivers
OK, that's new for me. I guess red bull is banned because of it's high coffeine levels?
clem wrote: but if you want to compare individual freedom between two countries you have to take this into account.
Agree.
clem wrote: Personal freedom is nice to the individual, it's not necessarily a good thing for a nation.
Agree.
clem wrote: Look at them, they all run Windows! If only there was a legislation to make them use Linux :lol:
I didn't say that. I look at Windows from a technical point of view and I find it's seriously flawed as a technical product. It's simple as that.
clem wrote: Note: I agree with the fact that the US is just the US and that what happens to US legislation doesn't affect the rest of the World or the Internet.
Bingo! :wink:
clem wrote: This is the case for software patents for instance. However, keep in mind that on the Web, the US represent grossly 50% of our Web traffic, 50% of our donations and I assume 50% of our user base. So for a project like Linux Mint, the US is not just a country among others... it's half of its community. This is very important IMHO.
Well, be cautious then :? ... Are you familiar with the case around Russian hacker Dmitry Sklyarov? He got arrested in the USA for breaking US software patents in Russia. Yes. Apparently US law doesn't care where exactly you break their patents.

So given that you have repeatedly stated that you don't care about patents (something that one might hold against you?) and given that Linux Mint incorporates technologies which might be regarded as "problematic" (that's why other distros don't incorporate those technologies!) and given that you are offering Linux Mint for download to US citizens and US customers, one might easily argue that you are actively breaking US laws or at least violating US patents, and thus making yourself a target for US law enforcement angencies. :?

Having worked in the past seven years for a US company I have seen such things happen: Things that are "normal" or "not worth anyone's attention" here in Europe can cause quite a lot of discussion in the USA ... and of course vice versa. But with software you really have to pay attention, especially if you distribute it to the USA.

I was under the impression that Linux Mint is mainly "an European thing" but if --as you say-- 50% of its user base are US-based then sooner or later you will have to give those patent issues a closer look and some really deep thoughts.

I am not a fan of the US patent system or their --IMHO-- wacky software patents, but I'd nontheless think twice about breaking their laws --regardless what I think of them-- if I were in the business of distributing software to US customers :?

Just my thoughts. :wink:
scorp123
Level 8
Level 8
Posts: 2272
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 4:19 pm
Location: Switzerland

Post by scorp123 »

RedJak wrote: But, since I never was a big fan of passivism, allow me to refute a few of Scorp's claims (just to set the record straight):
Thanks for that. Honestly. 8)
RedJak wrote: again, sorry for trolling.
We shall forgive you :wink:
User avatar
clem
Level 12
Level 12
Posts: 4303
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 8:34 am
Contact:

Post by clem »

We have to stop with that FUD. I am not afraid and I have no reasons to be afraid. In case you haven't noticed we're playing by the book here.

We are doing nothing wrong and nothing illegal. Even in the USA where we can fear potential legal threats due to software patents, until one is held against us, we are doing nothing illegal. Let's make that crystal clear.

We're already telling our users to use the Light Edition. We don't have to do that, we do it to make it clear to our users and to people who might want to take legal action against us that we have the power to go to the US market and provide something that they can't attack. If a country takes action and makes it impossible or illegal for its citizens to get the Full Edition, we'll still provide the Light Edition.

And even if Microsoft claimed royalties or legal action because they somehow "own" the Linux kernel, we'd provide something else and whatever we would do in the US, we'd still be the same outside of it.

I'm not going to back down and let FUD make people think we can be closed overnight by some patent lawyer. Let's make it clear to users and to companies: we're here to stay.

Clem
Image
scorp123
Level 8
Level 8
Posts: 2272
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 4:19 pm
Location: Switzerland

Post by scorp123 »

clem wrote: We have to stop with that FUD.
I'm just playing "advocatus diaboli" here :twisted:
clem wrote: I am not afraid and I have no reasons to be afraid. In case you haven't noticed we're playing by the book here. We are doing nothing wrong and nothing illegal. Even in the USA where we can fear potential legal threats due to software patents, until one is held against us, we are doing nothing illegal. Let's make that crystal clear. ... I'm not going to back down and let FUD make people think we can be closed overnight by some patent lawyer. Let's make it clear to users and to companies: we're here to stay.
Amen to that!

And to finally have this thread closed as per Husse's suggestion, I give the last word to Mark Shuttleworth:

"Microsoft is not the real threat"
http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/118

Quote from there: " ... I’m pretty certain that, within a few years, Microsoft themselves will be strong advocates against software patents. Why? Because Microsoft is irrevocably committed to shipping new software every year, and software patents represent landmines in their roadmap which they are going to step on, like it or not, with increasing regularity. They can’t sit on the sidelines of the software game - they actually have to ship new products. And every time they do that, they risk stepping on a patent landmine.

They are a perfect target - they have deep pockets, and they have no option but to negotiate a settlement, or go to court, when confronted with a patent suit.

Microsoft already spends a huge amount of money on patent settlements (far, far more than they could hope to realise through patent licensing of their own portfolio). That number will creep upwards until it’s abundantly clear to them that they would be better off if software patents were history.

In short, Microsoft will lose a patent trench war if they start one, and I’m sure that cooler heads in Redmond know that.
... "

Amen to that too :D
Locked

Return to “Chat about Linux”