Slightly (?) broken install...

Archived topics about LMDE 1 and LMDE 2
Locked
acurrie

Slightly (?) broken install...

Post by acurrie »

I'm running a fairly new installation on LMDE on my ThinkPad. It's mostly great, but for some reason I'm unable to upgrade it from the Terminal.

Here's what I get when I run "sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get dist-upgrade":

Code: Select all

Calculating upgrade... Failed
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
 libhsqldb-java : Depends: gij but it is not going to be installed or
                           java-gcj-compat or
                           java2-runtime
 python3 : Depends: python3.2 (>= 3.2~rc1) but it is not going to be installed
           Depends: python3-minimal (= 3.2-3) but it is not going to be installed
 tcl : Depends: tcl8.5 (>= 8.5.0-1) but it is not going to be installed
N: Ignoring file 'dropbox.list.save' in directory '/etc/apt/sources.list.d/' as it has an invalid filename extension
E: Error, pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated breaks, this may be caused by held packages.
The only things I can think of that may have inadvertently caused this are...

1. Grabbing the latest Chromium and Gwibber builds from the Sid repos, as per the instructions here.
2. Running Mint update from the GUI applet (once) before realizing that it doesn't currently work.

Is fixing this as easy as reactivating the Sid repo in "Software Sources" and hunting down these specific packages?

Thanks in advance for any insight into this...
Last edited by LockBot on Wed Dec 28, 2022 7:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Topic automatically closed 6 months after creation. New replies are no longer allowed.
AlbertP
Level 16
Level 16
Posts: 6701
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 12:38 pm
Location: Utrecht, The Netherlands

Re: Slightly (?) broken install...

Post by AlbertP »

I think someone at Debian hasn't sorted out the dependencies before putting this packages in Testing. You could indeed solve it by updating these packages from the Sid repo and then returning to Testing.
Registered Linux User #528502
Image
Feel free to correct me if I'm trying to write in Spanish, French or German.
zerozero

Re: Slightly (?) broken install...

Post by zerozero »

yeahh you broke it :)

when you upgrade gwibber, how many dependencies did it upgraded aswell?
at least python for what i can see;

solution? you can try with aptitude, to see if it downgrades the required pks

Code: Select all

sudo aptitude update

Code: Select all

sudo aptitude full-upgrade
but i can't tell you it will work
acurrie

Re: Slightly (?) broken install...

Post by acurrie »

Looks like aptitude might work:

Code: Select all

783 packages upgraded, 126 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 330 MB/758 MB of archives. After unpacking 575 MB will be used.
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  libsdl1.2debian: Conflicts: libsdl1.2debian-alsa but 1.2.14-6.1 is installed.
  libgfortran3: Depends: gcc-4.6-base (= 4.6.0-2) but 4.6.0-6 is installed.
  libgomp1: Depends: gcc-4.6-base (= 4.6.0-2) but 4.6.0-6 is installed.
  libgtkhtml-editor0: Depends: libgtkhtml3.14-19 (< 3.31) but 3.32.2-2 is to be installed.
  xserver-xorg-video-nv: Depends: xorg-video-abi-6.0 which is a virtual package.
  xserver-xorg-core: Breaks: xserver-xorg-video-6 which is a virtual package.
  libgcc1: Depends: gcc-4.6-base (= 4.6.0-2) but 4.6.0-6 is installed.
  libdrm-nouveau1a: Conflicts: libdrm-nouveau1 but 2.4.21-1~squeeze3 is installed.
  libgtkhtml-editor-3.14-common: Conflicts: libgtkhtml-editor-common but 3.30.3-1 is installed.
  ure: Breaks: openoffice.org-core (< 1:3.3~) but 1:3.2.1-9 is installed.
  libcryptui0a: Conflicts: libcryptui0 but 2.30.1-2 is installed.
  libquadmath0: Depends: gcc-4.6-base (= 4.6.0-2) but 4.6.0-6 is installed.
  esound-clients: Depends: esound-common (= 0.2.41-8) but 0.2.41-9 is to be installed.
The following actions will resolve these dependencies:

      Remove the following packages:                       
1)      openoffice.org-base-core                           
2)      openoffice.org-core                                
3)      xserver-xorg-video-nouveau                         
4)      xserver-xorg-video-nv                              

      Keep the following packages at their current version:
5)      cpp-4.4 [4.4.5-8 (now)]                            
6)      esound-common [0.2.41-8 (now)]                     
7)      evolution [Not Installed]                          
8)      evolution-plugins [Not Installed]                  
9)      g++ [4:4.4.5-1 (now)]                              
10)     g++-4.4 [4.4.5-8 (now)]                            
11)     g++-4.5 [Not Installed]                            
12)     gcc [4:4.4.5-1 (now)]                              
13)     gcc-4.4 [4.4.5-8 (now)]                            
14)     gcc-4.4-base [4.4.5-8 (now)]                       
15)     gcc-4.5 [Not Installed]                            
16)     gnome-core [1:2.30+6 (now)]                        
17)     libcryptui0a [Not Installed]                       
18)     libdrm-nouveau1a [Not Installed]                   
19)     libesd0 [0.2.41-8 (now)]                           
20)     libevolution [Not Installed]                       
21)     libgcc1 [1:4.4.5-8 (now)]                          
22)     libgfortran3 [4.4.5-8 (now)]                       
23)     libgomp1 [4.4.5-8 (now)]                           
24)     libgtkhtml-editor-3.14-0 [Not Installed]           
25)     libgtkhtml-editor-3.14-common [Not Installed]      
26)     libgtkhtml3.14-19 [3.30.3-1 (now)]                 
27)     libquadmath0 [Not Installed]                       
28)     libsdl1.2debian [1.2.14-6.1 (now)]                 
29)     libstdc++6-4.4-dev [4.4.5-8 (now)]                 
30)     libstdc++6-4.5-dev [Not Installed]                 
31)     seahorse [2.30.1-2 (now)]                          

      Leave the following dependencies unresolved:         
32)     evolution-common recommends evolution              


Accept this solution? [Y/n/q/?] y
Like I said, it's a fairly new installation -- so if things go awry I can always nuke & reinstall. And then learn about pinning packages, I guess..

Thank you both for the replies. :)
zerozero

Re: Slightly (?) broken install...

Post by zerozero »

ahh are you using nvidia? because "xserver-xorg-video-nouveau
xserver-xorg-video-nv " are going to be removed! and you will end up without x after the reboot

well it's a big mess anyway :)
good luck
acurrie

Re: Slightly (?) broken install...

Post by acurrie »

zerozero wrote:"xserver-xorg-video-nouveau xserver-xorg-video-nv " are going to be removed! and you will end up without x after the reboot
But not if I reinstall those packages before closing the terminal, right? It'll be a learning experience either way -- thanks for the heads-up!
zerozero

Re: Slightly (?) broken install...

Post by zerozero »

ohh yes it will a learning experience :lol:
but i don't think aptitude will install them again, not without wanting to remove others, i guess, and the hole will be deeper and deeper

welcome to dependencies nightmare :lol:
AlbertP
Level 16
Level 16
Posts: 6701
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 12:38 pm
Location: Utrecht, The Netherlands

Re: Slightly (?) broken install...

Post by AlbertP »

Welcome to the Debian :)

You do not get without X, however. You will be using Vesa. And if you don't have an NVidia card, don't worry.
Registered Linux User #528502
Image
Feel free to correct me if I'm trying to write in Spanish, French or German.
Locked

Return to “LMDE Archive”