

mikhou wrote:Anxiously awaiting the PPA link...![]()
mikhou
deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/merlwiz79/e17-svn/ubuntu natty main
deb-src http://ppa.launchpad.net/merlwiz79/e17-svn/ubuntu natty main 




deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/merlwiz79/e17-svn/ubuntu natty main
deb-src http://ppa.launchpad.net/merlwiz79/e17-svn/ubuntu natty main 





xetaprime wrote:Truth be told I'm not a developer. Just a tweaker and I've decided at least for today to hold off on the mint based e17. Not that I didn't get both 32 and 64 working- and I could get the 64 to install from the iso but couldn't for the life of me get the 32 iso to install (grub issue). Also there is just a really long boot time... any way as I said I love to fiddle so maybe I'll try and tweak ubiquity and remastersys... ehh...
Best wishes to all,
Xeta









ibm450 wrote:ok, what are the benefits of having a E17 mint? does it have better performance? uses much less resources?






AlbertP wrote:Do you think that Mint E17 will run on a Windows NT 4.0 machine from 199x, using Vesa for the graphics?

AlbertP wrote:Do you think that Mint E17 will run on a Windows NT 4.0 machine from 199x, using Vesa for the graphics?





Jake Alex wrote:Merlwiz79, why not give us some Mint's E17 loving? Upload the .iso you built to a server and let the link here on the forums for download.
I guess Linux Mint's users can help with the tests. This way you can have a more consistent results to present the .iso to Clem's.
Think about it"
Regards


Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests