zerozero wrote:well what can i say? with nvidia doesn't work, go figure that![]()
but anyway glad you got it up and running and welcome to the shell
Thank you
zerozero wrote:well what can i say? with nvidia doesn't work, go figure that![]()
but anyway glad you got it up and running and welcome to the shell





karashata wrote:Glad to see GNOME Shell back up and running on x64... I have to ask though, has anyone else noticed the custom CSS for their extensions being broken/ignored? My installed extensions seem to be missing their spacing and/or are misaligned, and I'm unsure as to why, or how to possibly fix it. Anyone have any ideas..?










GregE wrote:@edke
DO NOT INSTALL fglrx it will kill Gnome-Shell. I last tested with 11.6, but reports are that 11.7 is no better. It will run but with screen corruption everywhere. And it is a pain to remove and clean up all the symlinks and modules to get back to a working xorg-ati.
I have used the open source driver with an HD3450 and an HD 4250 and my new E350 Mini-ITX and they all ran Gnome-Shell smoothly with the open source driver. An Nvidia card with Nvidia drivers is the best performance option at the moment. Good old on board Intel works OK as well.





cbowman57 wrote:Well after playing with gnome-fallback for the past few days on my 64-bit installation I decided to un-pin everything and just let aptitude do a safe-upgrade. My shell now works again.
This is after doing a dist-upgrade to 'sid' on LMDE.


autocrosser wrote:
![]()
![]()
WELCOME BACK TO SHELL-LAND!!!
![]()
![]()
Hey!! it's fun 'hangin on the edgezerozero & I have lots of "fun" there & it has not broken (much---)
![]()
Now, if you are "really" adventurous---you could do "Expermintal"



cbowman57 wrote:I'm pulling packages from experimental, but I'll stick with sid for some modicum of stability thankyouverymuch.


autocrosser wrote:cbowman57 wrote:I'm pulling packages from experimental, but I'll stick with sid for some modicum of stability thankyouverymuch.
Hmmm...It's really been my experience that my Sid b0rks more than my Expermintal install....I know it goes against logic, but that is my 2 cents---that & a 1.25 will buy you a cup of coffee







cbowman57 wrote:Don't know if anyone else is already doing it or not but I'm in the process of trying to build a custom iso using mintconstructor. Remastersys just doesn't seem up to the task, apparently there is a difference between Debian & LMDE that the author chooses not to address.
Anyone else tackled this with mintconstructor? Are there better alternatives?
You can install LMDE on your box, along with mintconstructor, virtualbox-nonfree, etc...
Update to mintupdate-debian and point to the latest repo, and update to update-pack 1
sudo ln -s /usr/bin/genisoimage /usr/bin/mkisofs (to fix a regression on mintconstructor, bcause some ##### broke that upstream just because he could)
You can build packages and grub works just the same way as on the Ubuntu base.
For the repository, ideally you'd be using the main debian one.. same as me... or a new debian-kde repository.
To build the ISO, I would suggest starting off the LMDE Gnome ISO and from there removing Gnome/GDM and installing KDE/KDM... then progressively working on making it look and behave as similar to the current KDE Edition as possible.
You should note a significant improvement in speed and snappiness, especially with KDE.
The current KDE version in LMDE is 4.6.3.



Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest