"Latest" repository name
Forum rules
LMDE 2 has reached end of support as of 1-1-2019
LMDE 2 has reached end of support as of 1-1-2019
"Latest" repository name
Sorry. Why the repo "Latest" has this name?
I read through forum (LMDE) and often misundertand: latest repo - is it latest (read - recently updated) "incoming" repo or is it "latest" repo.
So. I understand, this is a little bit stupid, but could "latest" repo be renamed? For example "stable". Or whatever.
I read through forum (LMDE) and often misundertand: latest repo - is it latest (read - recently updated) "incoming" repo or is it "latest" repo.
So. I understand, this is a little bit stupid, but could "latest" repo be renamed? For example "stable". Or whatever.
Last edited by LockBot on Wed Dec 28, 2022 7:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Topic automatically closed 6 months after creation. New replies are no longer allowed.
Reason: Topic automatically closed 6 months after creation. New replies are no longer allowed.
- grimdestripador
- Level 6
- Posts: 1051
- Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 2:26 am
Re: "Latest" repository name
I don't think you have the structure down. Its not about lattest.
The Lattest LM or Ubuntu version will be the nighest letter (in alpha betaical order).
The different tags (unsure of the actualy word), specify which types of updates you want. Be it just secury, security plus some new functionality, New unsopported features from new version back ported to the old... They all have updates, they are all the lattest. They just give you different trusted versions of the programs' code.
The Lattest LM or Ubuntu version will be the nighest letter (in alpha betaical order).
The different tags (unsure of the actualy word), specify which types of updates you want. Be it just secury, security plus some new functionality, New unsopported features from new version back ported to the old... They all have updates, they are all the lattest. They just give you different trusted versions of the programs' code.
Re: "Latest" repository name
bikrus wrote:Sorry. Why the repo "Latest" has this name?
I read through forum (LMDE) and often misundertand: latest repo - is it latest (read - recently updated) "incoming" repo or is it "latest" repo.
So. I understand, this is a little bit stupid, but could "latest" repo be renamed? For example "stable". Or whatever.
Latest is the latest, tested and released LMDE mirror of the Debian testing repository. If you point your package manager at this repository you will get tested update packs about once per month or so.
Incoming is a rougher LMDE mirror of the Debian testing repository where the Mint team will test and patch the updates that flow into Debian testing. If you point your package manager at this repository, you will get updates more often but on the downside, there may be some regression for a few days after an update introduces a bug; after all, it is ultimately based on something called testing.
Debian testing is what LMDE is ultimately based on and is perhaps the rawest version of Debian testing ^_^
Stable is a Debian repository where there are few changes to versions of software except for security and bug patches.
You can read more here
Last edited by trollboy on Thu Jul 21, 2011 2:21 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Re: "Latest" repository name
Sorry, if I speaks wrong - English is not my native language. But, what about do you think reading the title of topic in this forum:
"Latest Updates Break System" ?
I could understand it these ways:
"(Repository with tag) Latest (have) Updates (which) Break System"
"Latest (read most fresh) Updates (to incoming(or any other) repository) Break System"
Thats why I propose to rename "latest" repo to "stable" - to specify the type of updates.
Is this is offtopic - sorry.
"Latest Updates Break System" ?
I could understand it these ways:
"(Repository with tag) Latest (have) Updates (which) Break System"
"Latest (read most fresh) Updates (to incoming(or any other) repository) Break System"
Code: Select all
The different tags (unsure of the actualy word), specify which types of updates you want.
Is this is offtopic - sorry.
Re: "Latest" repository name
Oh I See. In that instance it means the second one. Maybe it should be "released" to avoid confusion with Debian Stablebikrus wrote:Sorry, if I speaks wrong - English is not my native language. But, what about do you think reading the title of topic in this forum:
"Latest Updates Break System" ?
I could understand it these ways:
"(Repository with tag) Latest (have) Updates (which) Break System"
"Latest (read most fresh) Updates (to incoming(or any other) repository) Break System"
Thats why I propose to rename "latest" repo to "stable" - to specify the type of updates.Code: Select all
The different tags (unsure of the actualy word), specify which types of updates you want.
Is this is offtopic - sorry.
Re: "Latest" repository name
2 trollboy
Thank you. I fully understand the repository structure of Debian and LMDE. The documentation in your link (here) is very good for understanding:
(Debian testing) ---> (LMDE incoming) ---test_process---> (LMDE Incoming)
(LMDE incoming) ---if_STABLE---> (LMDE Latest).
if_STABLE = "Sometimes, things get broken in Debian Testing and fixed a couple of days later. When that happens, the Mint Debian Latest repository simply isn’t updated. We wait until the Debian Testing branch is STABLE again, and only then do you get the updates."
The keyword is STABLE. But the LMDE repository is named Latest, with the results I described in previous posts. For me Stable is much better name for Latest repo.
As "Stable" is not appropriate, maybe "Spin", "Milestone", "Stage" or ask community to propose the names and vote for them?
Thank you. I fully understand the repository structure of Debian and LMDE. The documentation in your link (here) is very good for understanding:
(Debian testing) ---> (LMDE incoming) ---test_process---> (LMDE Incoming)
(LMDE incoming) ---if_STABLE---> (LMDE Latest).
if_STABLE = "Sometimes, things get broken in Debian Testing and fixed a couple of days later. When that happens, the Mint Debian Latest repository simply isn’t updated. We wait until the Debian Testing branch is STABLE again, and only then do you get the updates."
The keyword is STABLE. But the LMDE repository is named Latest, with the results I described in previous posts. For me Stable is much better name for Latest repo.
Totally agree! I do not ask to rename exact to "Stable". The good reason to not rename to "Stable" - is your last message. I ask to rename it to something else then Latest.Maybe it should be "released" to avoid confusion with Debian Stable
As "Stable" is not appropriate, maybe "Spin", "Milestone", "Stage" or ask community to propose the names and vote for them?
Re: "Latest" repository name
I do find the title a bit odd simply because the packages in it are anything but "latest"...
Re: "Latest" repository name
Since "Latest" is the repo:bikrus wrote:2 trollboy
Totally agree! I do not ask to rename exact to "Stable". The good reason to not rename to "Stable" - is your last message. I ask to rename it to something else then Latest.
As "Stable" is not appropriate, maybe "Spin", "Milestone", "Stage" or ask community to propose the names and vote for them?
perhaps "Latest" could be renamed "Happy" or another name that does not already have widespread use.zerozero wrote:- where the updates only go after been tested in incoming, and the Mint team is happy with the stability of them;
http://forums.linuxmint.com/viewtopic.php?f=141&t=76556
Other possibilities are:
- "Checked"
"Reliable"
"Verified"
"OK"
"Safe"
"Gamma" (since it follows beta)
"H2G2" (since the packages are "Mostly Harmless")
Re: "Latest" repository name
I agree that the name "Latest" was not a good choice. It can be confusing.
As "stable" is not appropriate, I don't have a good suggestion at the moment though.
PS: Mint having it's "own" repository was a great idea!
As "stable" is not appropriate, I don't have a good suggestion at the moment though.
PS: Mint having it's "own" repository was a great idea!
Re: "Latest" repository name
How about "tested and approved"I agree that the name "Latest" was not a good choice. It can be confusing.
As "stable" is not appropriate, I don't have a good suggestion at the moment though.
Re: "Latest" repository name
You definitely have a good point... I'm not a native English speaker myself even though I consider myself being quite fluent, and I still scratch my head at times when I try to sort these things out (doesn't really help that all expressions in the Linux world can confuse if you're new at it...bikrus wrote:Sorry, if I speaks wrong - English is not my native language. But, what about do you think reading the title of topic in this forum:
"Latest Updates Break System" ?
I could understand it these ways:
"(Repository with tag) Latest (have) Updates (which) Break System"
"Latest (read most fresh) Updates (to incoming(or any other) repository) Break System"
Thats why I propose to rename "latest" repo to "stable" - to specify the type of updates.Code: Select all
The different tags (unsure of the actualy word), specify which types of updates you want.
Is this is offtopic - sorry.
In other words - I totally agree that it might be a good idea to rename the repositories.
- Pilosopong Tasyo
- Level 6
- Posts: 1432
- Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2009 3:26 am
- Location: Philippines
Re: "Latest" repository name
+1yaye wrote:"Testing" ---> "Pending" ---> "Approved"
"Latest" is pretty ambiguous. For the uninitiated, it does sound confusing when taken out of context.
o Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day. Teach him how to fish and he will eat for a lifetime!
o If an issue has been fixed, please edit your first post and add the word [SOLVED].
o If an issue has been fixed, please edit your first post and add the word [SOLVED].
Re: "Latest" repository name
How about following a pseudo application development naming standardyaye wrote:"Testing" ---> "Pending" ---> "Approved"
"Test" --> "QA" --> "Production" ??