



krushaaa wrote:hey guys,
got a little problem when opening a terminal:
- Code: Select all
bash: /dev/cgroup/cpu/user/4452/tasks: No such file or directory
bash: /dev/cgroup/cpu/user/4452/notify_on_release: No such file or directory
comes up.
hope this is not a double post of an already known problem, if so feel free to delete. ^^
Re: strange message in terminal
by lepht on Wed Apr 13, 2011 11:16 pm
To fix it remove or comment out these lines in /etc/bash.bashrc:
- Code: Select all
if [ "$PS1" ] ; then
mkdir -p -m 0700 /dev/cgroup/cpu/user/$$ > /dev/null 2>&1
echo $$ > /dev/cgroup/cpu/user/$$/tasks
echo "1" > /dev/cgroup/cpu/user/$$/notify_on_release
fi
These lines were from user space version of the 'famous 200 line patch', which has integrated into the latest liquorix kernel, making these lines unnecessary anyway






Niks wrote:Just picked up on the thunderbird thread here.
My thunder bird has disappeared ok reinstall no prob and the data is still there BUT.....
I can't find it in Software manager or synaptics ....
Now I'm not sure if it was just the update that did this, because I also ran a "complete removal" of pidgin because of facebook no longer connecting!
In any case any one know how to get it back ????? ( any points to the pidgin problem would be nice too)
sudo apt-get install --reinstall thunderbird



ASYNCMOUNTNFS=no


Virtuoso has been deleted (if it existed at all) because its usage count became zero
Ersatz für libvirtodbc0 wird entpackt ...
Vorbereitung zum Ersetzen von virtuoso-opensource-6.1-common 6.1.3+dfsg1-1 (durch .../virtuoso-opensource-6.1-common_6.1.3+dfsg1-2_i386.deb) ...
Ersatz für virtuoso-opensource-6.1-common wird entpackt ...
Vorbereitung zum Ersetzen von virtuoso-opensource-6.1-bin 6.1.3+dfsg1-1 (durch .../virtuoso-opensource-6.1-bin_6.1.3+dfsg1-2_i386.deb) ...
Ersatz für virtuoso-opensource-6.1-bin wird entpackt ...
Vorbereitung zum Ersetzen von virtuoso-minimal 6.1.3+dfsg1-1 (durch .../virtuoso-minimal_6.1.3+dfsg1-2_all.deb) ...
Ersatz für virtuoso-minimal wird entpackt ...
Vorbereitung zum Ersetzen von xserver-common 2:1.11.1-1+c0.frickel.1 (durch .../xserver-common_2%3a1.11.1.901-2_all.deb) ...
Ersatz für xserver-common wird entpackt ...
Vorbereitung zum Ersetzen von xserver-xephyr 2:1.11.1-1+c0.frickel.1 (durch .../xserver-xephyr_2%3a1.11.1.901-2_i386.deb) ...
Ersatz für xserver-xephyr wird entpackt ...
Vorbereitung zum Ersetzen von xserver-xorg-core 2:1.11.1-1+c0.frickel.1 (durch .../xserver-xorg-core_2%3a1.11.1.901-2_i386.deb) ...
Ersatz für xserver-xorg-core wird entpackt ...
Vorbereitung zum Ersetzen von xvfb 2:1.11.1-1+c0.frickel.1 (durch .../xvfb_2%3a1.11.1.901-2_i386.deb) ...
Ersatz für xvfb wird entpackt ...






Gerd50 wrote:Good news, Nvidia propdriver 290.03-1 is available in experimental. In the german debian forums it's reported this driver
is working well with xserver 2.1.11 stuff. I didn't try it yet, but will later this evening. Report follows around midnight




viking777 wrote:Gerd50 wrote:Good news, Nvidia propdriver 290.03-1 is available in experimental. In the german debian forums it's reported this driver
is working well with xserver 2.1.11 stuff. I didn't try it yet, but will later this evening. Report follows around midnight
Now that really is good news - thanks again Gerd. Dont think I will be up at midnight though





Gerd50 wrote:Here are the good news, Nvidia 290.03-1 from the experimental source is working fine on my system

amadeu@amadeu ~ $ apt-cache policy xserver-common
xserver-common:
Installed: 2:1.11.1.901-2
Candidate: 2:1.11.1.901-2
Version table:
*** 2:1.11.1.901-2 0
500 http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ testing/main amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
amadeu@amadeu ~ $ apt-cache policy nvidia-glx
nvidia-glx:
Installed: 290.03-1
Candidate: 290.03-1
Version table:
*** 290.03-1 0
500 http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ experimental/non-free amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
280.13.really.275.28-1 0
500 http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ testing/non-free amd64 Packages
amadeu@amadeu ~ $ glxgears
31513 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6302.551 FPS
33828 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6765.524 FPS
33876 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6775.057 FPS
33631 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6726.011 FPS
32840 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6567.867 FPS
31870 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6372.441 FPS




Gerd50 wrote:Here are the good news, Nvidia 290.03-1 from the experimental source is working fine on my system



Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests