- snapshot8.png (160.61 KiB) Viewed 4602 times



lwrver wrote:Ever since I upgraded to Firefox 6 in my LM9 it occasionally will not terminate firefox-bin when I exit the program. The next time I try to start firefox it gives an error message that says "firefox-bin is still running" and will not allow firefox to start until I manually kill the process. Why is this happening? Any ideas?



XPCOMGlueLoad error for file /home/brad/bin/firefox-aurora/libxpcom.so:
libxul.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
Couldn't load XPCOM.


linuxviolin wrote:...click on "Look for updates" in the window "About Aurora" in the Help menu. There is an update every day. ...

aes2011 wrote:Also, if they're daily, can you tell me the approx. size of the updates? TIA!


vrkalak wrote:aes2011 wrote:Also, if they're daily, can you tell me the approx. size of the updates? TIA!
Unfortunately, when you download/install an update, it is the entire Mozilla/Firefox-browser package ... last time I updated was to Firefox version 9.0 and it was somewhere around 26 Mb.
You might check in the Mozilla/Firefox Support Forums, they might be able to tell you more > http://forums.mozillazine.org/

aes2011 wrote:... I will post today's update size later....

aes2011 wrote:What I did day before even though many people don't advise was to download the Aurora tar from Mozilla (not from any ppa) and extract it to a folder in my home directory and allowed for automatically check for updates and to prompt me when an update is available. Yesterday, it updated and that was just ~830 kb. I will post today's update size later. Sometimes, there is a re-spin in which case there will be a "full" update, ~ 17MB in case of Aurora. I now use Aurora all the time but it uses the profile it finds in .mozilla from my regular Firefox install.
aes2011 wrote:Today's update was 854 kB. It does appear to me that getting the Aurora direct from Mozilla as opposed to getting it from a ppa will allow for daily delta updates on most days. I'm not seeing any serious disadvantage in this approach.

linuxviolin wrote:...
There is no disadvantage at all. And it's cleaner also ...



vrkalak wrote:The system - just upgraded to using Firefox-10a2 . . . what comes next ??

vrkalak wrote:... To see what Mozilla gives us for next year.

Line 5 is malformedE: Type 'https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/firefox-stable' is not known on line 6 in source list /etc/apt/sources.list
E: The list of sources could not be read.apt-get update && apt-get install firefox && apt-get upgrade
bootmakr wrote:LMDE




Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests