by bimsebasse on Wed Dec 28, 2011 7:49 pm
How is Gnome Shell or Unity tablet friendly? In Unity if you maximize a window you can't see window controls, they're only visibly on mouseover - tablet friendly? The hiding global menu? The hiding launcher? The emphasis on keyboard shortcuts? It's tablet friendly in the way it's small screen friendly (Unity was designed for netbooks), but the way you operate it makes it - currently - decidedly tablet unfriendly. Windows XP would be much easier to operate from a tablet than both Gnome Shell or Unity as things are now.
Mint will thrive as long as there is a strong wave of classic desktop nostalgia, when that dies out, and it will at some point, Mint must adjust or slowly slip into obscurity. People born ten years ago and onwards won't think or feel the Windows 95 desktop setup is the only desktop you can get work done in. I'm 32 and find Gnome Shell has enhanced my productivity greatly compared to an untouched gnome-panel under Gnome 2. Getting things done on my girlfriend's Mint 11 laptop or in a Cinnamon session is a chore now, no quick semantic launching, instead this constant mousing through menus for everything, it's a pain when you're used to speedier interaction.
Thank you for this thread. That’s all I can say. You most definitely have made this forum into something special. You clearly know what you are doing, you’ve covered so many bases. Thanks!