
metude wrote:So which one is better for me, Cinnamon or Mate?
I have one more question about installation. Previous version of Mint was having trouble about my partitons. I have three partition. One of them has 100gb space and haven't been allocated. But mint saw my disk as "1TB unallocated partition". I haven't tried it with Nadia, now downlading Nadia. Any idea why it happened?

nomko wrote:What is that first partition with the size of 100MB?

metude wrote:Firts one (100Mb) created by Windows. AFAIK something like swap area on Linux.

nomko wrote:1x 101GB => unallocated

metude wrote:nomko wrote:1x 101GB => unallocated
Then how can I install mint to here.

metude wrote:nomko wrote:1x 101GB => unallocated
Then how can I install mint to here.





741cc wrote:Edit - your second ss shows the live media has recognised your partitions as they are shown on the desktop. This must be an installer bug, maybe NTFS not recognised?


Lantesh wrote:During installation you have to choose the third option when asked where you want to do the install. I believe the option is "something else". This will allow you to manually choose the partition.
As for Cinnamon vs. MATE, I switched to Cinnamon when it first came out. It was very hard for me to let go of the old Gnome 2 environment, and at first I had planned to use MATE. After pondering it for awhile though it seemed to make more sense to use Cinnamon since it runs on Gnome 3, and uses GTK3. MATE is a great desktop, but the core of it is last generation code. At some point we all have to move forward. What would be really cool is if the MATE team could build it's desktop on top of Gnome 3, but I don't see that happening. I also did grow to love Cinnamon, so at this point I'd never go back.

I also prefer cinnamon for its more modern underpinnings (and the fact that its based on gnome-shell/mutter and has well integrated compositing, so I don't have to deal with compiz). MATE is a good desktop too, but I too don't like its implementation. I think it was kind of silly for MATE to fork gnome 2, instead of forking gnome-fallback (I've heard MATE does plan to go gtk3 eventually, but why do it this way? The gnome panel and gnome apps were *already* ported to gtk3... Yes gnome fallback needs improvement, but in the long run it would have been easier for them to fork gnome-fallback and improve that, rather than forking gnome 2 and then porting it to gtk3 some day :/) Anyway enough ranting from me



741cc wrote:I also prefer cinnamon for its more modern underpinnings (and the fact that its based on gnome-shell/mutter and has well integrated compositing, so I don't have to deal with compiz). MATE is a good desktop too, but I too don't like its implementation. I think it was kind of silly for MATE to fork gnome 2, instead of forking gnome-fallback (I've heard MATE does plan to go gtk3 eventually, but why do it this way? The gnome panel and gnome apps were *already* ported to gtk3... Yes gnome fallback needs improvement, but in the long run it would have been easier for them to fork gnome-fallback and improve that, rather than forking gnome 2 and then porting it to gtk3 some day :/) Anyway enough ranting from me
You'll be needing SolusOS 2 then. I think thats the direction they're heading. Stable one comes out when the next Debian stable release (7) comes out.

741cc wrote:When you say that you can access the two NTFS partitions from linux, do you mean from the live medium that you are attempting to install mint from?
Did you run gparted and format the 100 GB unallocated space to ext4 and try a re-install?



Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], High Value Warrior, oomper_loomper and 29 guests