LMDE BREAKAGES - (Tracking SID!) -{CLOSED}

Post your update and upgrade related errors here
Forum rules
Before you post please read this

Re: LMDE BREAKAGES - (Tracking SID!) - Jan 2, 2013

Postby zerozero on Mon Jan 07, 2013 12:11 am

Code: Select all
Calculating upgrade... Done
The following packages will be REMOVED:
  gcc-4.7-base:i386 libasound2:i386 libc6:i386 libc6-i686:i386
  libdbus-1-3:i386 libdrm-intel1:i386 libdrm-nouveau1a:i386
  libdrm-radeon1:i386 libdrm2:i386 libexpat1:i386 libffi5:i386
  libfontconfig1:i386 libfreetype6:i386 libgcc1:i386 libgcrypt11:i386
  libgl1-mesa-dri:i386 libgl1-mesa-glx:i386 libglapi-mesa:i386
  libglu1-mesa:i386 libgnutls26:i386 libgpg-error0:i386 libgpm2:i386
  libgsm1:i386 libice6:i386 libjbig0:i386 libjpeg8:i386 libltdl7:i386
  liblzma5:i386 libmpg123-0:i386 libncurses5:i386 libodbc1:i386
  libp11-kit0:i386 libpciaccess0:i386 libpng12-0:i386 libsm6:i386
  libssl1.0.0:i386 libstdc++6:i386 libtasn1-3:i386 libtiff4:i386
  libtinfo5:i386 libuuid1:i386 libv4l-0:i386 libv4lconvert0:i386 libwine:i386
  libwine-alsa:i386 libwine-bin:i386 libwine-gl:i386 libx11-6:i386
  libx11-xcb1:i386 libxau6:i386 libxcb-glx0:i386 libxcb1:i386
  libxcomposite1:i386 libxcursor1:i386 libxdamage1:i386 libxdmcp6:i386
  libxext6:i386 libxfixes3:i386 libxi6:i386 libxinerama1:i386 libxml2:i386
  libxrandr2:i386 libxrender1:i386 libxslt1.1:i386 libxxf86vm1:i386
  zlib1g:i386
The following packages will be upgraded:
  console-setup console-setup-linux cpp-4.7 firmware-atheros firmware-realtek
  g++-4.7 gcc-4.7 gcc-4.7-base gvfs gvfs-common gvfs-daemons gvfs-libs
  keyboard-configuration libavcodec54 libavformat54 libavutil51 libdrm-intel1
  libdrm-nouveau1a libdrm-radeon1 libdrm2 libgcc1 libgfortran3 libgnutls26
  libgomp1 libitm1 libpostproc52 libqt4-dbus libqt4-network libqt4-xml
  libqtcore4 libqtdbus4 libqtgui4 libquadmath0 librpm3 librpmbuild3 librpmio3
  librpmsign1 libsmbclient libstdc++6 libstdc++6-4.7-dev libswscale2
  libwbclient0 qdbus rpm rpm-common rpm2cpio samba-common samba-common-bin
  smbclient
49 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 66 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 59.8 MB of archives.
After this operation, 234 MB disk space will be freed.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]? n
Abort.

as far as i can see is gcc's upgrade from 4.7.2-4 to -5 to cause this but the changelog looks quiet normal
http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gcc-4.7 ... 0436Z.html
===================================
solved now (11.56am GMT) (was missing gcc-4.7-base:i386 :mrgreen: )
Code: Select all
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  libavutil52
The following packages will be upgraded:
  console-setup console-setup-linux cpp-4.7 firmware-atheros firmware-realtek
  g++-4.7 gcc-4.7 gcc-4.7-base gcc-4.7-base:i386 gvfs gvfs-common gvfs-daemons
  gvfs-libs keyboard-configuration libavcodec54 libavformat54 libavutil51
  libdrm-intel1 libdrm-intel1:i386 libdrm-nouveau1a libdrm-nouveau1a:i386
  libdrm-radeon1 libdrm-radeon1:i386 libdrm2 libdrm2:i386 libgcc1 libgcc1:i386
  libgfortran3 libgnutls26 libgnutls26:i386 libgomp1 libitm1 libpostproc52
  libqt4-dbus libqt4-network libqt4-xml libqtcore4 libqtdbus4 libqtgui4
  libquadmath0 librpm3 librpmbuild3 librpmio3 librpmsign1 libsmbclient
  libstdc++6 libstdc++6:i386 libstdc++6-4.7-dev libswscale2 libwbclient0 qdbus
  rpm rpm-common rpm2cpio samba-common samba-common-bin smbclient
57 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 63.0 MB of archives.
User avatar
zerozero
Level 16
Level 16
 
Posts: 6435
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 2:29 pm

Linux Mint is funded by ads and donations.
 

Re: LMDE BREAKAGES - (Tracking SID!) - Jan 2, 2013

Postby Niks on Tue Jan 08, 2013 7:13 am

Not sure if this is a breakage but check the first post I made here http://forums.linuxmint.com/viewtopic.php?f=196&t=120387&p=662493#p662493
Was working on this http://forums.linuxmint.com/viewtopic.php?f=47&t=113559&start=300 when I find this ....maybe related:?:
User avatar
Niks
Level 3
Level 3
 
Posts: 164
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 6:59 am
Location: Netherlands

Re: LMDE BREAKAGES - (Tracking SID!) - Jan 2, 2013

Postby Bonsaii on Thu Jan 10, 2013 1:30 am

Hi,

This is a big thank you to all testers!
UP6 went through with 0 problems
for me. So, thank you all.
Thinkpad T410s, LMDE 64Bit, Cinnamon
Bonsaii
Level 2
Level 2
 
Posts: 88
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 8:49 am

Re: LMDE BREAKAGES - (Tracking SID!) - Jan 2, 2013

Postby Brian49 on Sat Jan 12, 2013 3:32 pm

Today's upgrade to the initscripts package and related packages produces this message on system startup:

"/lib/init/mount-functions.sh: line 39: cannot create temp file for here-document: Read-only file system"

I can't see anything relating to this at line 39 of the mount-functions.sh file.

This has already been reported as a bug in one or two places on the internet.
Brian49
Level 5
Level 5
 
Posts: 601
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2009 2:27 pm

Re: LMDE BREAKAGES - (Tracking SID!) - Jan 2, 2013

Postby zerozero on Sat Jan 12, 2013 3:42 pm

i have those updates here now
Code: Select all
Calculating upgrade... Done
The following packages will be upgraded:
  gparted initscripts libavcodec54 libavformat54 libavutil51 libpostproc52
  libswscale2 sysv-rc sysvinit sysvinit-utils
10 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
let's see how it goes :shock:
apt-litbugs didn't find anything
Code: Select all
Fetched 5,760 kB in 5s (974 kB/s)     
Retrieving bug reports... Done
Parsing Found/Fixed information... Done
Reading changelogs... Done
Preconfiguring packages ...
User avatar
zerozero
Level 16
Level 16
 
Posts: 6435
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 2:29 pm

Re: LMDE BREAKAGES - (Tracking SID!) - Jan 2, 2013

Postby mockturtl on Sat Jan 12, 2013 4:25 pm

Brian49 wrote:Today's upgrade to the initscripts package and related packages produces this message on system startup:

"/lib/init/mount-functions.sh: line 39: cannot create temp file for here-document: Read-only file system"
#697994
Image
User avatar
mockturtl
Level 4
Level 4
 
Posts: 437
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 8:51 pm

Re: LMDE BREAKAGES - (Tracking SID!) - Jan 2, 2013

Postby zerozero on Sat Jan 12, 2013 5:05 pm

i see no errors at boot nor are they logged
Code: Select all
root@debian:/home/zerozero# cat /var/log/boot
(Nothing has been logged yet.)
User avatar
zerozero
Level 16
Level 16
 
Posts: 6435
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 2:29 pm

Re: LMDE BREAKAGES - (Tracking SID!) - Jan 2, 2013

Postby GregE on Sat Jan 12, 2013 6:25 pm

Reading the bug report the person is running a 3.8 kernel. I am running 3.7 from Experimental and I do not get the error.
User avatar
GregE
Level 4
Level 4
 
Posts: 440
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2011 6:24 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: LMDE BREAKAGES - (Tracking SID!) - Jan 2, 2013

Postby zerozero on Sat Jan 12, 2013 6:39 pm

yep, latest liquorix here
Code: Select all
zerozero@debian:~$ uname -a
Linux debian 3.7.0-1.dmz.6-liquorix-amd64 #1 ZEN SMP PREEMPT Wed Jan 2 01:59:41 UTC 2013 x86_64 GNU/Linux
User avatar
zerozero
Level 16
Level 16
 
Posts: 6435
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 2:29 pm

Re: LMDE BREAKAGES - (Tracking SID!) - Jan 2, 2013

Postby cwwgateway on Sat Jan 12, 2013 6:44 pm

I also have no errors with kernel 3.7 from liquorix (64-bit). This makes me think though - has anyone switched to upstart or systemd on Debian? I just tried systemd in VBox and, while VBox performance is hard to measure, it booted in basically the same time (although because of VBox it isn't too accurate).
Dell XPS 15 l502x - Debian Testing 64-bit NetInst Xfce, SolydX 64-bit Debian Testing, SolydK 64-bit SolydXK Testing
Old Gateway Pentium 4 Desktop - Arch Linux 64-bit Xfce and SolydX 32-bit Sid
cwwgateway
Level 5
Level 5
 
Posts: 839
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 10:44 pm

Re: LMDE BREAKAGES - (Tracking SID!) - Jan 2, 2013

Postby wayne128 on Sat Jan 12, 2013 7:32 pm

cwwgateway wrote:I also have no errors with kernel 3.7 from liquorix (64-bit). This makes me think though - has anyone switched to upstart or systemd on Debian? I just tried systemd in VBox and, while VBox performance is hard to measure, it booted in basically the same time (although because of VBox it isn't too accurate).


I had another distros using systemd.

Boot time check:
dmesg showed very fast response, something in th order of 14.x second, while older method is around 25-30 seconds.
However I do not really get that advantage on such a 'huge boot time reduction' because actually the desktop is ready only around 30 seconds.

Reboot issue:
then on many reboot I notice a few times it does not want to boot my desktop.
upon some discussion, I eventually return to old method sysv

on another computer, 10-yr old, most of the time it cannot cold boot.
return to sysv resolved that issue.

Not going to use systemd for a while.
wayne128
Level 9
Level 9
 
Posts: 2804
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 12:15 am

Re: LMDE BREAKAGES - (Tracking SID!) - Jan 2, 2013

Postby karashata on Sat Jan 12, 2013 7:50 pm

I tried systemd for a while and it worked, but then an update broke it so I went back to sysv.

I tried it again somewhat recently after the update to GNOME 3.6, because Plymouth and GDM 3.6 weren't getting along with sysv as the system manager, but for some reason I failed to get a proper 3D-acceleted environment, it seems the Intel graphics driver failed to load properly and I ended up on the Gallium driver through LLVM-pipe or whatever... (Plymouth and GDM seemed to get along fine with systemd handling everything, though...) Since not having the Intel driver working wasn't going to cut it I went back to sysv and removed Plymouth instead so everything works, though I am disappointed I can't have a nice splash screen...

I will note that boot times did improve slightly with systemd, but my computer already boots relatively quickly, and I still have to wait a little while for the desktop to appear after I've logged in anyway, so the few extra seconds or so I saved really didn't matter too much.
Linux Mint user since 2010, fluffy dragon forever!
Registered Linux User #473695
Image
User avatar
karashata
Level 4
Level 4
 
Posts: 441
Joined: Tue May 10, 2011 2:53 pm
Location: Stratford, Ontario, Canada

Re: LMDE BREAKAGES - (Tracking SID!) - Jan 2, 2013

Postby zerozero on Sat Jan 12, 2013 8:01 pm

systemd:
one and half year install broke to pieces due to a in-the-fly change to systemd (even if the change was prepared for almost 6 months)
reinstall afresh with a systemd based iso and the boot time is slightly faster but this experience made me think: if debian decides to switch to systemd (is there other option?) we gonna have serious issues in sid/testing when that happens.
User avatar
zerozero
Level 16
Level 16
 
Posts: 6435
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 2:29 pm

Re: LMDE BREAKAGES - (Tracking SID!) - Jan 2, 2013

Postby Brian49 on Sun Jan 13, 2013 8:01 am

If I wanted to try out systemd, how would I do it, please? Many thanks.
Brian49
Level 5
Level 5
 
Posts: 601
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2009 2:27 pm

Re: LMDE BREAKAGES - (Tracking SID!) - Jan 2, 2013

Postby cwwgateway on Sun Jan 13, 2013 10:10 am

Brian49 wrote:If I wanted to try out systemd, how would I do it, please? Many thanks.

I installed "systemd" and "systemd-gui" and ran as root:
Code: Select all
nano /etc/default/grub

Then I changed GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT line to read the following following:
Code: Select all
GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT="quiet init=/lib/systemd/systemd"

And then I ran
Code: Select all
update-grub

This was done on a fresh Debian Sid Xfce install in VBox, so I have no idea how it may play out for you, especially since others don't seem to have had such great experiences.
Dell XPS 15 l502x - Debian Testing 64-bit NetInst Xfce, SolydX 64-bit Debian Testing, SolydK 64-bit SolydXK Testing
Old Gateway Pentium 4 Desktop - Arch Linux 64-bit Xfce and SolydX 32-bit Sid
cwwgateway
Level 5
Level 5
 
Posts: 839
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 10:44 pm

Re: LMDE BREAKAGES - (Tracking SID!) - Jan 2, 2013

Postby zerozero on Sun Jan 13, 2013 10:32 am

just for curiosity (i have no desire to try systemd this soon unless i'm forced to :lol: ) i went to check the wiki http://wiki.debian.org/systemd and it looks that it (still) has a few rough edges.
User avatar
zerozero
Level 16
Level 16
 
Posts: 6435
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 2:29 pm

Re: LMDE BREAKAGES - (Tracking SID!) - Jan 2, 2013

Postby Brian49 on Sun Jan 13, 2013 11:35 am

Thanks for the pointers, I've installed systemd, and it seems to be working fine so far. It reduces bootup time by a few seconds. I might be imagining things, but it also seems as though my system is a bit more responsive than before.
Brian49
Level 5
Level 5
 
Posts: 601
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2009 2:27 pm

Re: LMDE BREAKAGES - (Tracking SID!) - Jan 2, 2013

Postby mockturtl on Sun Jan 27, 2013 9:31 pm

There's some sort of conflict between libjack0 and libjack-jackd2-0 on multi-arch -- they both provide a virtual package libjack-0.116 required to install ia32-libs (needed for this Steam game).

I had to replace uninstall libjack0 and install libjack-jackd2-0, then install libjack-jackd2-0:i386.

[Recent Debian Steam instructions are a little hard to find -- I got it running on sid with a couple packages from experimental. The critical step is removing 1:0.99.1 from the libpulse dependency in steam_latest.deb's DEBIAN/control file.]
Image
User avatar
mockturtl
Level 4
Level 4
 
Posts: 437
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 8:51 pm

Re: LMDE BREAKAGES - (Tracking SID!) - Jan 2, 2013

Postby zerozero on Mon Jan 28, 2013 3:39 pm

mock :D funny i was yesterday checking steam (tho i don't even have a steam account :mrgreen: ) because i found this >> http://aspensmonster.com/2013/01/19/updated-procedures-for-installing-steam-for-linux-beta-on-debian-gnulinux-testingwheezy/ (the guide from Dec/7th and the further notations are more robust than this new one imo)

mockturtl wrote:There's some sort of conflict between libjack0 and libjack-jackd2-0 on multi-arch -- they both provide a virtual package libjack-0.116 required to install ia32-libs (needed for this Steam game).
i had this replace back in oct (running testing in this install)
Code: Select all
Commit Log for Mon Oct 29 00:39:08 2012


Removed the following packages:
libjack0

Installed the following packages:
jackd (5)
jackd2 (1.9.8~dfsg.4+20120529git007cdc37-4.1)
jackd2-firewire (1.9.8~dfsg.4+20120529git007cdc37-4.1)
libconfig++9 (1.4.8-5)
libffado2 (2.0.99+svn2171-2)
libjack-jackd2-0 (1.9.8~dfsg.4+20120529git007cdc37-4.1)
libxml++2.6-2 (2.34.2-1)
projectm-jack (2.1.0+dfsg-1)
projectm-pulseaudio (2.1.0+dfsg-1)
qjackctl (0.3.9-2)


back to steam yesterday i installed
Code: Select all
Commit Log for Mon Jan 28 01:00:49 2013


Installed the following packages:
libatk1.0-0:i386 (2.4.0-2)
libcairo2:i386 (1.12.2-2)
libdatrie1:i386 (0.2.5-3)
libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0:i386 (2.26.1-1)
libgtk2.0-0:i386 (2.24.10-2)
libjasper1:i386 (1.900.1-13)
libpango1.0-0:i386 (1.30.0-1)
libthai0:i386 (0.1.18-2)
libxcb-shm0:i386 (1.8.1-2)

but got stuck with libnspr4:i386 the output is too weird
Code: Select all
sudo apt-get -s install libnspr4:i386
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree       
Reading state information... Done
The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required:
  lib32z1 libc6-i386 libcurl3-gnutls:i386 libpython3.2 libtheora0:i386 libudev0:i386
  ncurses-term pax
Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove them.
The following packages will be REMOVED:
  alien ca-certificates-java chromium chromium-browser default-jre default-jre-headless
  flashplugin-nonfree icedtea-6-jre-cacao icedtea-6-jre-jamvm icedtea-7-jre-cacao
  icedtea-7-jre-jamvm libnspr4 libnspr4-0d libnss3 libnss3-1d libreoffice libreoffice-base
  libreoffice-base-core libreoffice-calc libreoffice-common libreoffice-core
  libreoffice-draw libreoffice-emailmerge libreoffice-filter-binfilter
  libreoffice-filter-mobiledev libreoffice-impress libreoffice-java-common libreoffice-kde
  libreoffice-math libreoffice-report-builder-bin libreoffice-style-galaxy
  libreoffice-style-oxygen libreoffice-writer librpm3 librpmbuild3 librpmio2 librpmio3
  librpmsign1 openjdk-6-jre openjdk-6-jre-headless openjdk-6-jre-lib openjdk-7-jre-headless
  openjdk-7-jre-lib python-uno rpm rpm-common rpm2cpio
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  libnspr4:i386
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 47 to remove and 0 not upgraded.


LO, chromium, flashplugin, openjdk*
seems a bit too much :lol:
and i didn't tackle yet the libc6:i386 and multiarch-support dependencies problem
right now trying to install steam_latest gives me this
Code: Select all
deb-kde Downloads # dpkg -i steam_latest.deb
Selecting previously unselected package steam.
(Reading database ... 268593 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking steam (from steam_latest.deb) ...
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of steam:
 steam depends on multiarch-support (>= 2.15-0ubuntu10.2); however:
  Version of multiarch-support on system is 2.13-37.
 steam depends on libc6 (>= 2.15); however:
  Version of libc6:i386 on system is 2.13-37.
 steam depends on libnspr4 (>= 1.8.0.10); however:
 steam depends on libnss3 (>= 3.12.3); however:
 steam depends on libpulse0 (>= 1:0.99.1); however:
  Version of libpulse0:i386 on system is 2.0-6.

dpkg: error processing steam (--install):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
Processing triggers for man-db ...
Processing triggers for hicolor-icon-theme ...
Processing triggers for bamfdaemon ...
Rebuilding /usr/share/applications/bamf.index...
Processing triggers for desktop-file-utils ...
Errors were encountered while processing:
 steam
User avatar
zerozero
Level 16
Level 16
 
Posts: 6435
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 2:29 pm

Re: LMDE BREAKAGES - (Tracking SID!) - Jan 2, 2013

Postby mockturtl on Tue Jan 29, 2013 12:28 pm

zerozero wrote:and i didn't tackle yet the libc6:i386 and multiarch-support dependencies problem

If you can risk it, I think that's the first thing to do, and the conflict with libnspr4:i386 should go away. (I used aptitude -- it may have suggested a better resolution. EDIT: this one --)

Code: Select all
The following actions will resolve these dependencies:

     Upgrade the following packages:                                                 
1)     libc-dev-bin [2.13-38 (now, unstable) -> 2.17-0experimental0 (experimental)]   
2)     libc6-dev [2.13-38 (now, unstable) -> 2.17-0experimental0 (experimental)]     
3)     libc6-i386 [2.13-38 (now, unstable) -> 2.17-0experimental0 (experimental)]     
4)     libc6-i686:i386 [2.13-38 (now, unstable) -> 2.17-0experimental0 (experimental)]

Accept this solution? [Y/n/q/?] y
The following packages will be upgraded:
  libc-dev-bin libc6 libc6:i386 libc6-dev libc6-i386 libc6-i686:i386 locales
7 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 692 not upgraded.
Need to get 21.4 MB of archives. After unpacking 3,320 kB will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n/?] y

#
# next, installing the other i386 dependencies...
#

The following actions will resolve these dependencies:

     Downgrade the following packages:                                 
1)     libcurl3-gnutls [7.28.0-3 (now, unstable) -> 7.26.0-1 (testing)]
2)     libudev-dev [175-7.1 (now, unstable) -> 175-7 (testing)]       
3)     libudev0 [175-7.1 (now, unstable) -> 175-7 (testing)]           
4)     udev [175-7.1 (now, unstable) -> 175-7 (testing)]               

Accept this solution? [Y/n/q/?] y
The following packages will be DOWNGRADED:
  libcurl3-gnutls libudev-dev libudev0 udev
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  libcurl3-gnutls:i386 libtheora0:i386 libudev0:i386
0 packages upgraded, 3 newly installed, 4 downgraded, 0 to remove and 6 not upgraded.
Need to get 1,707 kB of archives. After unpacking 1,590 kB will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n/?] y

#
# one last bit -- this didn't happen in KDE
#

Unpacking steam (from Desktop/steam_latest.deb) ...
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of steam:
 steam depends on xterm | gnome-terminal.

# well, I'm in gnome-terminal now... we'll try the other
$ install xterm
# now Steam is installed


I haven't noticed a problem, but someone reports trouble:

debian-devel

So you basicly have libc6 installed 4 times, twice for i386 and twice for amd64. I could understand that you had 3 of the 4 packages installed, but all 4 makes little sense to me.

If you remove libc6-amd64 (and libc6-i386) you shouldn't see those issues anymore. But watch out for #699206

#699206 wrote:On my amd64 system I installed libc6-amd64:i386, to see how that behaves.



Image

Code: Select all
$ policy libc6-amd64
libc6-amd64:i386:
  Installed: (none)
  Candidate: 2.13-38
  Version table:
     2.16-0experimental1 0
          1 http://http.debian.net/debian/ experimental/main i386 Packages
     2.13-38 0
        500 http://http.debian.net/debian/ sid/main i386 Packages

$ policy libc6-i386
libc6-i386:
  Installed: 2.16-0experimental1
  Candidate: 2.16-0experimental1
  Version table:
 *** 2.16-0experimental1 0
          1 http://http.debian.net/debian/ experimental/main amd64 Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
     2.13-38 0
        500 http://http.debian.net/debian/ sid/main amd64 Packages

$ policy  libc6 libc6:i386
libc6:
  Installed: 2.16-0experimental1
  Candidate: 2.16-0experimental1
  Version table:
 *** 2.16-0experimental1 0
          1 http://http.debian.net/debian/ experimental/main amd64 Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
     2.13-38 0
        500 http://http.debian.net/debian/ sid/main amd64 Packages
libc6:i386:
  Installed: 2.16-0experimental1
  Candidate: 2.16-0experimental1
  Version table:
 *** 2.16-0experimental1 0
          1 http://http.debian.net/debian/ experimental/main i386 Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
     2.13-38 0
        500 http://http.debian.net/debian/ sid/main i386 Packages
Image
User avatar
mockturtl
Level 4
Level 4
 
Posts: 437
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 8:51 pm

Linux Mint is funded by ads and donations.
 
PreviousNext

Return to Update/Upgrade Issues

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests