LM Fluxbox 9 update?

Forum rules
Before you post please read how to get help
dexl
Level 3
Level 3
Posts: 118
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2010 10:16 am

LM Fluxbox 9 update?

Postby dexl » Sun Apr 17, 2016 7:38 pm

I have a theoretical question. I know LM Fluxbox 9 is already obsolete, no support, etc. If I wanted to install it though and keep it up to date (the base system), would I be able to do that? Say, by pointing the repositories to the latest LTS or something along those lines? How would I go about doing that? Or is that a lost cause altogether?

User avatar
Pierre
Level 15
Level 15
Posts: 5934
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2008 5:33 am
Location: Perth, AU.

Re: LM Fluxbox 9 update?

Postby Pierre » Sun Apr 17, 2016 11:01 pm

it's a lost cause ..
& you'd break something, if you did force an update to any later repo's.

I've still got a Mint Mate v9 laptop,
and the only thing that gets any update is FireFox - manually updated.

there is also a Mint Mate v5 laptop, as well & it's FF there, as well.

why so old ? coz the hardware is also ancient
& would like to keep the older system anyway.
Image
Please edit your original post title to include [SOLVED] - when your problem is solved!
and DO LOOK at those Unanswered Topics - - you may be able to answer some!.

User avatar
richyrich
Level 18
Level 18
Posts: 8677
Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 8:31 pm

Re: LM Fluxbox 9 update?

Postby richyrich » Sun Apr 17, 2016 11:36 pm

May be an idea to install, say Xfce 13 or 17, then installing Fluxbox from the Package Manager (Synaptic). (don't forget to also check for Recommended files & libraries, with a right-click on the fluxbox pkg)

User avatar
Flemur
Level 13
Level 13
Posts: 4658
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:41 pm
Location: Potemkin Village

Re: LM Fluxbox 9 update?

Postby Flemur » Mon Apr 18, 2016 10:48 am

Installing any current Mint OS, then adding fluxbox is easy and works fine.
Mint 18.3 Xfce/fluxbox/pulse-less
Xubuntu 17.10/fluxbox/pulse-less
Please edit your original post title to include [SOLVED] if/when it is solved!
Your data and OS are backed up....right?

User avatar
richyrich
Level 18
Level 18
Posts: 8677
Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 8:31 pm

Re: LM Fluxbox 9 update?

Postby richyrich » Mon Apr 18, 2016 11:24 am

LM 9 Fluxbox edition was one of my all time Mint favorites :D

Habitual
Level 13
Level 13
Posts: 4866
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2010 8:31 pm
Location: 0.0.0.0

Re: LM Fluxbox 9 update?

Postby Habitual » Mon Apr 18, 2016 11:59 am

dexl wrote:If I wanted to install it though and keep it up to date (the base system), would I be able to do that?

no, No, and NO
Image

dexl
Level 3
Level 3
Posts: 118
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2010 10:16 am

Re: LM Fluxbox 9 update?

Postby dexl » Tue Apr 19, 2016 7:29 am

Flemur wrote:Installing any current Mint OS, then adding fluxbox is easy and works fine.


I did try installing fluxbox but I'm on a netbook (eee pc) and it still seems to be sluggish with LM MATE 17.3 base. Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't adding fluxbox to LM Mate 17.3 only a stopgap measure? Aren't some of the MATE processes running in the background with fluxbox?

I'm trying to figure out whether getting a core LM (or Ubuntu) with no DE other than fluxbox would improve performance?

User avatar
Flemur
Level 13
Level 13
Posts: 4658
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:41 pm
Location: Potemkin Village

Re: LM Fluxbox 9 update?

Postby Flemur » Tue Apr 19, 2016 11:21 am

Code: Select all

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't adding fluxbox to LM Mate 17.3 only a stopgap measure? Aren't some of the MATE processes running in the background with fluxbox?

I dunno. I use xfce base and for me there are no "*fce*" processes running (except a terminal); I shut off some things via "bum" and/or "startup manager" (whatever it's called). I've never used Mate.

I had fluxbox installed in Arch and Debian as the only desktop/window-manager and performance and "free -m" were almost exactly the same as installing fluxbox on top of Mint Xfce - and the latter was a lot easier (there are extra pieces to add for detecting USB and some other stuff which an Xfce or maybe a Mate install provide; in Mint I still needed to add "xsettingsd" to get all the fonts to look right). A Mint-Fluxbox edition would be nice, though. FWIW I'm on a pretty low-end desktop machine and menus, switching desktops (the #1 to #4 kind of desktop) and such react instantaneously even without nvidia drivers.
Mint 18.3 Xfce/fluxbox/pulse-less
Xubuntu 17.10/fluxbox/pulse-less
Please edit your original post title to include [SOLVED] if/when it is solved!
Your data and OS are backed up....right?

linux-dummie
Level 3
Level 3
Posts: 155
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2012 4:10 pm

Re: LM Fluxbox 9 update?

Postby linux-dummie » Wed Apr 20, 2016 6:21 pm

Yeh, Mint Fluxbox or even Openbox would be dandy. I think the configuring is much easier on FB, but I'll use either in a heartbeat over any other DE if I can get them natively built in a distro (that is, not having to install them myself after the fact). They just make my computing life a whole lot simpler and faster. I'm using xfce, and it works okay, no complaints. I've also used mate, no complaints either. But for an overall streamlined, uncluttered desktop, quicker access to the programs I need, and a super-fast o.s. I like the 'boxes best.

dexl
Level 3
Level 3
Posts: 118
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2010 10:16 am

Re: LM Fluxbox 9 update?

Postby dexl » Mon May 23, 2016 5:18 pm

OK, I'm resurrecting this month-old thread because I have yet another super crazy idea... (I'm trying to learn something here, don't get nervous! ;) )

What if after installing the base system [is there such a thing as linux mint mini.iso just as there is the ubuntu mini.iso?] and adding fluxbox on top of that, I wanted to style it to look and behave in the same way as LM FB9? Is that doable in less than a century? ;) I was thinking of copying over some of the settings, adding tint2 and so on. Am I on the right track?

User avatar
Flemur
Level 13
Level 13
Posts: 4658
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:41 pm
Location: Potemkin Village

Re: LM Fluxbox 9 update?

Postby Flemur » Tue May 24, 2016 11:25 am

What if after installing the base system [is there such a thing as linux mint mini.iso just as there is the ubuntu mini.iso?]

I don't think so.
and adding fluxbox on top of that, I wanted to style it to look and behave in the same way as LM FB9? Is that doable in less than a century?

Copy over your LM9 ~/.fluxbox directory, including the styles. You'll probably have to tweak some stuff.
You may have to manually install "xsettingsd", start it in "~/.fluxbox/startup" and make a "~/.xsettingsd" file (font settings, icon theme, etc).

Edit: you probably have a ~/.xsettingsd file in the LM FB9 install - copy that and change as needed.
Mint 18.3 Xfce/fluxbox/pulse-less
Xubuntu 17.10/fluxbox/pulse-less
Please edit your original post title to include [SOLVED] if/when it is solved!
Your data and OS are backed up....right?

dexl
Level 3
Level 3
Posts: 118
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2010 10:16 am

Re: LM Fluxbox 9 update?

Postby dexl » Wed May 25, 2016 9:33 am

Thanks, I'll keep this thread updated on my progress.

tpprynn
Level 3
Level 3
Posts: 178
Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 7:09 pm

Re: LM Fluxbox 9 update?

Postby tpprynn » Fri May 27, 2016 7:32 am

I wasn't sure where/whether to make this post at least here but it seems preferable to sending an unsolicited PM.

If Pierre is reading, could I ask how Mint 9 with manually updated Firefox works as referred to above? For me, Ubuntu 10.04, Mint 9 and Debian 6 were a peak, performance- and appearance-wise, and I'd like to have kept an install on at least my Thinkpad. But newer versions of Firefox weren't behaving at least the way I did it, it kept crashing - I'd get the tarball from Mozilla and extract it in /opt/ and then create a keyboard shortcut to it. I think I ascertained also that addons weren't at fault. Did I miss something?

Thanks.

Hoser Rob
Level 9
Level 9
Posts: 2893
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2012 8:57 am

Re: LM Fluxbox 9 update?

Postby Hoser Rob » Sat May 28, 2016 9:51 am

tpprynn wrote:I wasn't sure where/whether to make this post at least here but it seems preferable to sending an unsolicited PM.

If Pierre is reading, could I ask how Mint 9 with manually updated Firefox works as referred to above? For me, Ubuntu 10.04, Mint 9 and Debian 6 were a peak, performance- and appearance-wise, and I'd like to have kept an install on at least my Thinkpad. But newer versions of Firefox weren't behaving at least the way I did it, it kept crashing - I'd get the tarball from Mozilla and extract it in /opt/ and then create a keyboard shortcut to it. I think I ascertained also that addons weren't at fault. Did I miss something?

Thanks.


Using an up to date browser with a release that old is not going to solve the security nightmare it represents.


Return to “Others”