[POLL] New Linux Mint logo, now re-done!

[gugalcrom123]

A few months ago I made this. It was received very well. However, there were some issues.

This logo has a leaf shape. It's 50% circle, 50% square. The circle was too boring (though it is still an alternate version, and there are also high badges) and it was not minty. The colours are #4caf50 and #388e3c.

Now, I have redone it. There are more variants, a new font (Ubuntu Medium in lowercase), and it's pixel-perfect and the "Lm" is aligned to the diagonal. The "L" in the "Lm" was made higher so it does not look like a three-fingered fist anymore (no offence) . The "m" was also made a bit higher, but not by much. I have made 38, 53 including LMDE logos variants. Some might say it's too much, but in reality they are all just different coloured logos, and some mono and outline variants, plus some circle and square ones which should not be used much. However they all look delightful.

Main logo:


With text:


Some high badge version:


The "Lm":


You can also find them here.

Nice preview:


All logos:

[all41]

I liked them before, and still like them. These reflect considerable artistic effort on your part.
Thanks

[JerryF]

I really like yours. The two shades of green give it the look of a mint leaf!

[gugalcrom123]

I really like yours. The two shades of green give it the look of a mint leaf!

And the shape, too.

[gugalcrom123]

Re-done old wallpapers that Termy said were screaming "modern" and "premium".

[gugalcrom123]

If anyone has some Blender experience, you could try to make a 3d wallpaper.

[gugalcrom123]

Just for fun, world's smallest logos. I only did 3.
Leaf (only 561 bytes!):

Leaf-mono-green (only 502 bytes!):

Simple (only 481 bytes!):

[Daisuke]

The 3D leaf is very cool.

[gugalcrom123]

Updated plymouth theme.

[gugalcrom123]

The 3D leaf is very cool.

It's not 3d, it's two-tone.

[Daisuke]

An optical illusion Now that you pointed it out, I see it! In any case, a very cool logo!

[DPM]

This two-tone looks like the glossy buttons from around 2010.

[gugalcrom123]

This two-tone looks like the glossy buttons from around 2010.

So do you like it? Plus, it doesn't. It's material design.

[DPM]

So do you like it? Plus, it doesn't. It's material design.

I think it looks outdated, and material design doesn't have split buttons. That split thing was web 2.0 before flat which was before material.

[gugalcrom123]

So do you like it? Plus, it doesn't. It's material design.

I think it looks outdated, and material design doesn't have split buttons. That split thing was web 2.0 before flat which was before material.

Actually it has, for icons, not for buttons. A good example are the old icons for google apps.

I don't mean buttons.

[gugalcrom123]

So do you like it? Plus, it doesn't. It's material design.

I think it looks outdated, and material design doesn't have split buttons. That split thing was web 2.0 before flat which was before material.

It's not a button.

[DPM]

It's not a button.

The button was an example where this effect was used heavily in that era. Other examples would be the progress bars in Win 7. The point isn't that the logo is neither a button nor a progress bar, but that this split effect was all over the place in that era. That's why I think the logo looks 2010-ish.

[gugalcrom123]

Made a nice preview. See it in the first post.

[gugalcrom123]

You are going to ask for LMDE logos. I made LMDE logos.
LMDE logos:

[gugalcrom123]

Actually it has, for icons, not for buttons. A good example are the old icons for google apps.

I don't mean buttons.