Cinnamon VS Mate VS KDE VS XFCE. A list of comments I found around.

Please post suggestions for improvement of Cinnamon here
https://github.com/linuxmint/Cinnamon
Post Reply
winxpwasgreat
Level 2
Level 2
Posts: 96
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2018 3:36 am

Cinnamon VS Mate VS KDE VS XFCE. A list of comments I found around.

Post by winxpwasgreat » Mon Apr 16, 2018 4:03 am

I will have to reinstall linux again as a result of a few upgrades which unrevertably consta-crashed the system.
I've been using Cinnamon so will give a go to one of the other 3 main desktop environments.
Not KDE since it's more resource-intensive therefore the choice is left between Mate and XFCE.

The overall impression I have got reading from various sources:

1. Mate is more user-friendly and graphically-oriented than XFCE (slightly more designed for terminal nerds).
2. XFCE has a blockier appearance.
3. XFCE is the best desktop environment option for more Linux distros because of its track record of development.
4. With Mate you will have greater support for bugs over time because of more coders.
5. In terms of memory usage they are both great however Mate is about 20% less resource-intensive.
6. The initial impact of XFCE is more bare bones than Mate..
7. ..however XFCE grants the best possibilities for customization.
8. XFCE development is growing whereas Mate is losing pace.

Some of those statements could be trolls, some true, some completely false, some partial truths, and some other could have been true in the past but are not anymore.
Would be great to hear what you guys think about those points,

About me, I have an OK machine and just need something that works. No need for rounded corners and flash animations. However as an ex xp user I am unfamiliar with console dialog. Paramount for me are stability, widespread use / community, usability (hate mocking around with consoles) and low ram usage.
Last edited by winxpwasgreat on Mon Apr 16, 2018 4:05 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
catweazel
Level 14
Level 14
Posts: 5449
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2012 9:44 pm
Location: Australian Antarctic Territory

Re: Cinnamon VS Mate VS KDE VS XFCE. A list of comments I found around.

Post by catweazel » Mon Apr 16, 2018 4:05 am

winxpwasgreat wrote:
Mon Apr 16, 2018 4:03 am
8. XFCE development is growing whereas Mate is losing pace.
Hardly. Xfce is considered feature complete.
A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it. - Max Planck

User avatar
jimallyn
Level 18
Level 18
Posts: 8009
Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2014 7:34 pm
Location: Wenatchee, WA USA

Re: Cinnamon VS Mate VS KDE VS XFCE. A list of comments I found around.

Post by jimallyn » Mon Apr 16, 2018 4:37 am

When I first started using Mint, I installed the Cinnamon version. Later I got an old laptop and decided to try XFCE on it as I didn't think it had enough oomph to run Cinnamon. I like XFCE enough that when I install a newer version of Mint, I am planning to install XFCE. There are a few features in Cinnamon that I rely on that don't seem to be available in MATE, and I couldn't figure out any way to add them. I was able to get XFCE to do everything I needed it to do. I will agree with catweazel that XFCE is quite feature complete. A while back I installed XFCE and MATE on an old laptop to check CPU and memory usage. XFCE is better than MATE.
Image

“If the government were coming for your TVs and cars, then you'd be upset. But, as it is, they're only coming for your sons.” - Daniel Berrigan

User avatar
Pjotr
Level 20
Level 20
Posts: 10214
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2011 10:18 am
Location: The Netherlands (Holland)
Contact:

Re: Cinnamon VS Mate VS KDE VS XFCE. A list of comments I found around.

Post by Pjotr » Mon Apr 16, 2018 4:53 am

KDE is on the way out (no KDE edition in Mint 19). So I wouldn't select KDE. For the rest, it's simply a matter of personal preferences:

- Cinnamon: most "bells and whistles", latest technology, fastest pace of development, heaviest

- Mate: somewhat less frills, slightly older and perhaps somewhat more stable technology, medium weight

- XFCE: rather minimalistic, glacially evolving stable technology, lightweight

Personally, I tend to install Cinnamon on my fast modern machines, and XFCE on the older and weaker ones.
Last edited by Pjotr on Mon Apr 16, 2018 6:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
Tip: 10 things to do after installing Linux Mint 19 Tara
Keep your Linux Mint healthy: Avoid these 10 fatal mistakes
Twitter: twitter.com/easylinuxtips
All in all, horse sense simply makes sense.

winxpwasgreat
Level 2
Level 2
Posts: 96
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2018 3:36 am

Re: Cinnamon VS Mate VS KDE VS XFCE. A list of comments I found around.

Post by winxpwasgreat » Mon Apr 16, 2018 5:20 am

Useful information - thank you for your feedbacks.

What would you say about the first point:
"1. Mate is more user-friendly and graphically-oriented than XFCE (slightly more designed for terminal nerds)."?

I am leaning towards XFCE because I highly value stability and speed, however I don't really want to mess around with terminal console any more than I have been already doing with Cinnamon.

User avatar
kc1di
Level 12
Level 12
Posts: 4367
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 8:44 pm
Location: Maine USA

Re: Cinnamon VS Mate VS KDE VS XFCE. A list of comments I found around.

Post by kc1di » Mon Apr 16, 2018 5:36 am

winxpwasgreat wrote:
Mon Apr 16, 2018 4:03 am
I will have to reinstall linux again as a result of a few upgrades which unrevertably consta-crashed the system.
I've been using Cinnamon so will give a go to one of the other 3 main desktop environments.
Not KDE since it's more resource-intensive therefore the choice is left between Mate and XFCE.
Actually KDE plasma 5 is less resource-intensive than Cinnamon most of the time. But KDE is not going to be supported when Mint 19 comes out.
Mate and Xfce are great choices but best way to find out if they fit your needs is to run them both and choose the one that suits you the best.

Happy seeking :)
Easy tips : https://sites.google.com/site/easylinuxtipsproject/
Linux Mint Installation Guide: http://linuxmint-installation-guide.rea ... en/latest/
Registered Linux User #462608

User avatar
Pjotr
Level 20
Level 20
Posts: 10214
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2011 10:18 am
Location: The Netherlands (Holland)
Contact:

Re: Cinnamon VS Mate VS KDE VS XFCE. A list of comments I found around.

Post by Pjotr » Mon Apr 16, 2018 6:11 am

winxpwasgreat wrote:
Mon Apr 16, 2018 5:20 am
What would you say about the first point:
"1. Mate is more user-friendly and graphically-oriented than XFCE (slightly more designed for terminal nerds)."?
I'd say that's nonsense. Both are equally graphically-oriented. :)
Tip: 10 things to do after installing Linux Mint 19 Tara
Keep your Linux Mint healthy: Avoid these 10 fatal mistakes
Twitter: twitter.com/easylinuxtips
All in all, horse sense simply makes sense.

User avatar
MtnDewManiac
Level 6
Level 6
Posts: 1307
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2013 5:18 pm
Location: United States

Re: Cinnamon VS Mate VS KDE VS XFCE. A list of comments I found around.

Post by MtnDewManiac » Thu Apr 19, 2018 1:23 am

catweazel wrote:
Mon Apr 16, 2018 4:05 am
winxpwasgreat wrote:
Mon Apr 16, 2018 4:03 am
8. XFCE development is growing whereas Mate is losing pace.
Hardly. Xfce is considered feature complete.
Lest people misunderstand your comment and get the idea that it is no longer being actively developed, it is. They seem to be on 4.13 now, although that is a "development version," if I understand correctly, and 4.14 will be the next "released for general consumption" one.

I do, however, agree that Xfce is feature-complete. By that, I mean it has all the features that I require - or even want.

I don't really follow the developers' email list, but I do know that they're more or less focused on changing things from GTK2 to GTK3 (ongoing). I glanced at a review of 4.13 the other day. I didn't read it thoroughly, because a review of a development version is useless to me, but I did notice that the reviewer stated Xfce is (IIRC) using more of the modern OpenGL features... or something like that, lol, and as a result, the reviewer found that his screen tearing issue (that many seem to have?) disappeared.

Regards,
MDM
Mint 18 Xfce 4.12.

If guns kill people, then pencils misspell words, cars make people drive drunk, and spoons made Rosie O'Donnell fat.

Dot_mdb
Level 1
Level 1
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 9:16 pm

Re: Cinnamon VS Mate VS KDE VS XFCE. A list of comments I found around.

Post by Dot_mdb » Wed May 02, 2018 9:54 pm

I have a bias toward Cinnamon because I have run it on my main machine doing 99% of what I do for the past 3 years. But I have experimented with XFCE on an older less powerful machine. I found it to be acceptable but not as good an experience as Cinnamon. I pulled 18.3 XFCE off that machine and put on Cinnamon and I don't see any drop off in performance and it has become a pleasure to use. I have done some experimenting with some lightweight distributions. I am now playing with LXLE. Not bad, but not Cinnamon. What I am seeing is that to run a modern browser like Firefox you need a decent amount of RAM. I'm not going to fool around with SeaMonkey or others just so I can say I ran a machine with a little less RAM. I am starting to think that 4GB is the baseline. No question machines can boot and run on less but from what I am seeing if it takes a different operating system or desktop it is not going to be worth the sacrifice in experience. So if it takes a $40 investment in RAM to upgrade a machine so be it. If it isn't worth the investment than I declare the machine obsolete.

Hoser Rob
Level 11
Level 11
Posts: 3842
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2012 8:57 am

Re: Cinnamon VS Mate VS KDE VS XFCE. A list of comments I found around.

Post by Hoser Rob » Thu May 03, 2018 9:24 am

winxpwasgreat wrote:
Mon Apr 16, 2018 4:03 am
... Not KDE since it's more resource-intensive therefore the choice is left between Mate and XFCE. ...
KDE is not the resource hog, Cinnamon is (seriously, 1.2G RAM usage with a Linux DE that isn't even all THAT powerful?). I wouldn't run KDE on my 1Gb netbook but it tuns about as fast on my laptop as Xfce did. I always disable KDE file indexing because, like most user, I don't need it. But if I did it'd still work out as fast as Xfce on that machine.

The only real suggestion I can make here is to just dl the isos of the different DE versions. Then boot them up from a USB stick and see for yourself. I don';t think this discussion is going to enlighten you any more than that will.

A few years ago I would have suggested Xfce over Mate for speed but ever since Xfce 4.12 came out I rescind that. They've bloated it (I use barely more RAM in KDE than XFce 4.12 needs and it's as fast as Xfce), they haven't added any real functionality, and it's still buggy. Mate is better sorted.

winxpwasgreat
Level 2
Level 2
Posts: 96
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2018 3:36 am

Re: Cinnamon VS Mate VS KDE VS XFCE. A list of comments I found around.

Post by winxpwasgreat » Sat May 05, 2018 4:39 am

I tried the live cd of xfce 18.3.
Certain pages such as idex.market/guidelines still kinda freeze the whole thing, same problem I get when I run my cinnamon 17.3.

It puzzles me how I get this issue when using a live freaking cd
Any explanations? My laptop isn't old.

User avatar
catweazel
Level 14
Level 14
Posts: 5449
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2012 9:44 pm
Location: Australian Antarctic Territory

Re: Cinnamon VS Mate VS KDE VS XFCE. A list of comments I found around.

Post by catweazel » Sat May 05, 2018 4:40 am

winxpwasgreat wrote:
Sat May 05, 2018 4:39 am
Any explanations?
Start a new thread.
A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it. - Max Planck

User avatar
rado84
Level 3
Level 3
Posts: 120
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2012 9:31 am
Location: Sofia, Bulgaria
Contact:

Re: Cinnamon VS Mate VS KDE VS XFCE. A list of comments I found around.

Post by rado84 » Mon May 07, 2018 5:47 am

Imo XFCE is better than KDE because XFCE's settings are more intuitive and easier to find. Not only the panel settings but also those in the menu. KDE settings are grouped by type while XFCE are not which makes them easier to find for newbies like me. Besides, XFCE has more colors while KDE looks like it was built up in a hurry - the damn thing is so ugly that I'd prefer XFCE any time.
AsRock B85M Pro4, Core i3-4170, Palit GTX 1050 Ti 4GB, Corsair CX750 PSU, Corsair 32GB DDR3-1600, Corsair Force LE 120GB, WD Caviar Blue + Green = 1.5TB, Chromium, Mint 18.3 Cinnamon x64

aes2011
Level 4
Level 4
Posts: 461
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 10:39 pm

Re: Cinnamon VS Mate VS KDE VS XFCE. A list of comments I found around.

Post by aes2011 » Mon May 07, 2018 7:13 am

rado84 wrote:
Mon May 07, 2018 5:47 am
... Besides, XFCE has more colors
What does that mean?

User avatar
JerryF
Level 8
Level 8
Posts: 2472
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 1:23 pm
Location: Rhode Island, USA

Re: Cinnamon VS Mate VS KDE VS XFCE. A list of comments I found around.

Post by JerryF » Mon May 07, 2018 8:45 am

Most of those statements are hogwash.

I started with Cinnamon; love it and still is my go to. I then started experimenting with MATE. For some reason(s), don't care for it as much. Now I'm trying out Xfce, so I can't comment fully about it but so far, I think I like it more than MATE.

As for memory usage, when I run Cinnamon, MATE, or Xfce from a live USB flash drive, I found that all were in the same ballpark at the starting point at desktop after one minute's wait.
Please edit your original post and add [SOLVED] to the beginning of the Subject Line if your problem has been solved. It helps other members.

exploder
Level 15
Level 15
Posts: 5529
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 10:50 am
Location: HartfordCity, Indiana USA
Contact:

Re: Cinnamon VS Mate VS KDE VS XFCE. A list of comments I found around.

Post by exploder » Mon May 07, 2018 1:06 pm

KDE has gotten considerably lighter over time. I have Kubuntu 18.04 installed on one of my desktops and memory use at start up is only 364 MB. :D

User avatar
lsemmens
Level 4
Level 4
Posts: 386
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2014 9:07 pm
Location: Rural South Australia

Re: Cinnamon VS Mate VS KDE VS XFCE. A list of comments I found around.

Post by lsemmens » Tue May 08, 2018 6:55 am

I use Cinnamon, the question I would ask is "What do you prefer">

It matters not which DE you run, provided it does what you want, and you are happy with what it provides. This is not unlike the Linux/Windoze/Fruit debate. If you like Apple, then bits of fruit are your preference, if Windoze, ditto, If Linux, then at least you are intelligent...........whoops.....did I just say that? :mrgreen:
Kernel: 4.13.0-37-generic x86_64 (64 bit gcc: 5.4.0)
Desktop: Cinnamon 3.6.7 (Gtk 3.18.9-1ubuntu3.3)
Distro: Linux Mint 18.3 Sylvia

Laptop T4500 Dualcore 3Gb RAM
Out of my mind - please leave a message

Post Reply

Return to “Cinnamon”