What is going on with these level 5 updates?

Archived topics about LMDE 1 and LMDE 2
Locked
User avatar
sdibaja
Level 5
Level 5
Posts: 899
Joined: Sun May 08, 2011 12:57 pm
Location: Baja California, Mexico

What is going on with these level 5 updates?

Post by sdibaja »

side topic... I did not want to start a new thread, and the gurus are here :-)
I use LMDE, but I believe it is the same with Mint.

I started taking the level 5 updates a few months ago, in near blind ignorance.

this shows 3.16.0 is getting updated, but it is still 3.16.0 ... what is going on here?
Kernel updates.png
thanks
Last edited by LockBot on Wed Dec 28, 2022 7:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Topic automatically closed 6 months after creation. New replies are no longer allowed.
Peter
Mate desktop https://wiki.debian.org/MATE
Debian GNU/Linux operating system: https://www.debian.org/download
User avatar
xenopeek
Level 25
Level 25
Posts: 29615
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 3:58 am

Re: Non technical explanation needed, please.

Post by xenopeek »

sdibaja wrote:this shows 3.16.0 is getting updated, but it is still 3.16.0 ... what is going on here?
Security fixes.
Image
User avatar
Moem
Level 22
Level 22
Posts: 16238
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2015 9:14 am
Location: The Netherlands
Contact:

Re: What is going on with these level 5 updates?

Post by Moem »

sdibaja wrote:side topic... I did not want to start a new thread, and the gurus are here :-)
[mod note]
So I've done it for you. Please do not add a new topic to another thread, especially one that another user has started; it's called hijacking. A new question deserves a new thread.
Image

If your issue is solved, kindly indicate that by editing the first post in the topic, and adding [SOLVED] to the title. Thanks!
cb474

Re: What is going on with these level 5 updates?

Post by cb474 »

sdibaja wrote:this shows 3.16.0 is getting updated, but it is still 3.16.0 ... what is going on here?
But if you look at the old version and new version columns you can see it's going from 3.16.39-1 to 3.16.43-2. I personally find it confusing that the package name does not change when the kernel has a minor version upgrade. Other distros treat this differently and would just rename the package after the precise kernel version.

Anyway, as xenopeek says, these are probably security fixes.

Mint, as far as I understand, also has a policy to rank package upgrades based on how likely they are or not to affect the stability of your system. In other words, could the update introduce a bug that makes your system not work properly. That's what the "5" reflects on these kernel updates. So Mint prioritizes, as far as I understand, stability issues no matter how small, over security issues no matter how large.

I find this a little baffling with LMDE, since it is based on Debian Stable, which is widely considered to be one of, if not the most stable distros. It's hard for me to imagine a Debian Stable security update breaking something on someone's system. But I guess perhaps on some more obscure hardware? I don't know.

I think if Debian Stable is working on your system, which it is if you are running LMDE, then it's hard to imagine how any security updates for it are going to break your system. But on the other hand, security updates are really important, in this era in which hacking becomes ever more commonplace. I just would not forego a security update to the kernel, over the tiny risk that it might cause some stability problem. I've never once had this happen (frankly even simply running whatever is the latest version of the kernel--as I do with another system running Manjaro).

So I have always been a bit baffled why the security updates to the Debian Stable kernel are always labeled "5" ("dangerous updates"). In fact, it was some of the "1" ("certified updates") updates to Mint specific packages that recently broke things on a lot of people's systems, which is the only time I've ever had a problem with LMDE updates (since it changed to Debian Stable).

Obviously, no update sytsem is prefect. But if you were running plain Debian Stable, you'd take the security updates to the kernel without a second thought and would be considered to be running one of the most stable systems you could. So I think it doesn't make a lot of sense to treat them as "dangerous" in LMDE, which is essentially Debian Stable. To me, not taking the security updates seems much more dangerous.
User avatar
sdibaja
Level 5
Level 5
Posts: 899
Joined: Sun May 08, 2011 12:57 pm
Location: Baja California, Mexico

Re: What is going on with these level 5 updates?

Post by sdibaja »

Moem wrote:
sdibaja wrote:side topic... I did not want to start a new thread, and the gurus are here :-)
[mod note]
So I've done it for you. Please do not add a new topic to another thread, especially one that another user has started; it's called hijacking. A new question deserves a new thread.
Pardon me, I have been properly chastised. I do understand I was rude.

However, your topic header does not actually reflect my question about the nature and content of kernels. My fault, the question was not properly phrased. I have started a new thread for that.

The nature and "safety" of the levels in the Update Manager does need to be discussed, especially considering the broken systems this last week with a big slug of Level 1 Updates
Update Levels.png
Peter
Mate desktop https://wiki.debian.org/MATE
Debian GNU/Linux operating system: https://www.debian.org/download
Locked

Return to “LMDE Archive”