Shouldn't Firefox be a Cindy version?

Questions about applications and software
Forum rules
Before you post please read how to get help
Post Reply
Level 3
Level 3
Posts: 109
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2011 12:22 pm

Shouldn't Firefox be a Cindy version?

Post by axisofevil » Tue Sep 18, 2018 1:07 pm

Out of curiosity, I was comparing the apt and apt-get ways of presenting information:-
apt policy firefox
Installed: 60.2.0esr~linuxmint1+betsy
Candidate: 60.2.0esr~linuxmint1+betsy
Version table:
*** 60.2.0esr~linuxmint1+betsy 700
700 cindy/upstream amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
apt-cache policy firefox gives the same information.

But why is a Betsy version of firefox installed?

Level 19
Level 19
Posts: 9203
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2018 5:11 pm

Re: Shouldn't Firefox be a Cindy version?

Post by gm10 » Tue Sep 18, 2018 1:21 pm

The Mint-team created no Cindy-specific package of Firefox. There's no reason for that if both releases can match the required dependencies.

Post Reply

Return to “Software & Applications”