I'm new to the ssd world
I have a 256gb ssd and a 1tb hdd so I'm wondering, would it be better to install root, swap, and boot to the ssd and select the hdd for /home? Or is it best to use the hdd for storage and the ssd for everything?
SSD vs HDD for /home
Forum rules
Before you post read how to get help. Topics in this forum are automatically closed 6 months after creation.
Before you post read how to get help. Topics in this forum are automatically closed 6 months after creation.
SSD vs HDD for /home
Last edited by LockBot on Wed Dec 28, 2022 7:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Topic automatically closed 6 months after creation. New replies are no longer allowed.
Reason: Topic automatically closed 6 months after creation. New replies are no longer allowed.
- catweazel
- Level 19
- Posts: 9763
- Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2012 9:44 pm
- Location: Australian Antarctic Territory
Re: SSD vs HDD for /home
This is a matter of opinion. I'm inclined to suggest using the SSD for mostly everything and the HDD as a backup and scratch area.
"There is, ultimately, only one truth -- cogito, ergo sum -- everything else is an assumption." - Me, my swansong.
-
- Level 6
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: Thu Dec 26, 2013 10:19 am
- Location: N.E. AR USA
Re: SSD vs HDD for /home
I tend to agree with catweazel. Everything on the SSD is easier to set up, and performance will likely be best with the HDD as a storage only device.
Re: SSD vs HDD for /home
Thank you guys. I figured it's a matter of personal choice, but I also value your opinions because it is my first ssd
Re: SSD vs HDD for /home
256GB is a decent size SSD, so I would just do a plain install on that. No 'cleverness' with separate partitions for /home and the like. Use your HDD for data and replace directories that may use a lot of storage like /home/music, /home/movies etc with links to equivalent folders on the HDD.
If it ever comes time to install a new OS, simply copy /home onto the HDD (where most of your data is already safely stashed), install the new OS and copy any required files in /home (like .mozilla for Firefox and .thunderbird for thunderbird) over the ones on the SSD.
This is the way I run my systems and I think it's the best option on balance.
If it ever comes time to install a new OS, simply copy /home onto the HDD (where most of your data is already safely stashed), install the new OS and copy any required files in /home (like .mozilla for Firefox and .thunderbird for thunderbird) over the ones on the SSD.
This is the way I run my systems and I think it's the best option on balance.
- catweazel
- Level 19
- Posts: 9763
- Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2012 9:44 pm
- Location: Australian Antarctic Territory
Re: SSD vs HDD for /home
In that case there are some tips for you to extend its life. You'll hear a lot about SSDs having a limited life but nowadays that's what we call a 'furphy' in Australia. SSDs actually have a longer life expectancy than physical HHDs. When you setup your SSD, leave 5%-10% of the space at the end of the disk without a partition (unallocated). Your SSD controller will see this and use it for wear levelling, greatly extending the life and reliability of your system.kelltech wrote:Thank you guys. I figured it's a matter of personal choice, but I also value your opinions because it is my first ssd
See Pjotr's site here. Call for help if you need it.
"There is, ultimately, only one truth -- cogito, ergo sum -- everything else is an assumption." - Me, my swansong.
Re: SSD vs HDD for /home
Very helpful (hey admitted I didn't ask the question but it is one on my mind since I bought a 250 GB SSD which the notion that the next full update (not just a point one) since I'd want to do a clean install - I'd install the SSD and use my HDD for the large music and video files.catweazel wrote: In that case there are some tips for you to extend its life. You'll hear a lot about SSDs having a limited life but nowadays that's what we call a 'furphy' in Australia. SSDs actually have a longer life expectancy than physical HHDs. When you setup your SSD, leave 5%-10% of the space at the end of the disk without a partition (unallocated). Your SSD controller will see this and use it for wear levelling, greatly extending the life and reliability of your system.
See Pjotr's site here. Call for help if you need it.
So the thread and link are bookmarked for future reference/research!
Re: SSD vs HDD for /home
FWIW, I semi-recently got an SSD and did all the "maximize lifetime" stuff, then after reading more, just went back to a normal setup with everything on the SSD...except /tmp is in memory. fstab line:kelltech wrote:II have a 256gb ssd and a 1tb hdd so I'm wondering, would it be better to install root, swap, and boot to the ssd and select the hdd for /home? Or is it best to use the hdd for storage and the ssd for everything?
Code: Select all
tmpfs /tmp tmpfs defaults,noatime,mode=1777 0 0
Please edit your original post title to include [SOLVED] if/when it is solved!
Your data and OS are backed up....right?
Your data and OS are backed up....right?
Re: SSD vs HDD for /home
You can optimize your setting.
Add parameter discard and noatime in /etc/fstab.
discard - turn on TRIM
noatime - disable last access time
You can move /tmp to RAM
size=512M - max. size of ramdisk (only used if needed)
Add parameter discard and noatime in /etc/fstab.
discard - turn on TRIM
noatime - disable last access time
Code: Select all
e.g.
/dev/sda1 / ext4 discard,defaults,noatime 0 1
Code: Select all
none /tmp tmpfs nodev,nosuid,noatime,size=512M,mode=1777 0 0