Why not merge with LMDE?

Forum rules
Before you post please read how to get help
Post Reply
Borsook
Level 3
Level 3
Posts: 127
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 5:48 am

Why not merge with LMDE?

Post by Borsook » Mon Mar 21, 2011 7:35 pm

It seems to me that merging with LMDE could be a good idea, basically it would only require a small modification to the installer to allow the choice of the default DE, even the software selection is pretty much similar now...

TBABill
Level 6
Level 6
Posts: 1361
Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 1:02 pm
Location: Leonardtown, MD

Re: Why not merge with LMDE?

Post by TBABill » Mon Mar 21, 2011 7:46 pm

What do you mean by merge with LMDE? It's a standalone offering not based on Ubuntu. Just trying to understand or clarify what you mean.

cpatrick08
Level 3
Level 3
Posts: 163
Joined: Sat May 22, 2010 2:17 pm
Location: Huntsville, AL

Re: Why not merge with LMDE?

Post by cpatrick08 » Mon Mar 21, 2011 8:02 pm

TBABill wrote:What do you mean by merge with LMDE? It's a standalone offering not based on Ubuntu. Just trying to understand or clarify what you mean.
i think the original poster meant put both on the same ISO letting the user choose between which one they want to install

jeffreyC
Level 4
Level 4
Posts: 321
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 9:34 pm

Re: Why not merge with LMDE?

Post by jeffreyC » Mon Mar 21, 2011 8:56 pm

Makes a lot of sense to me as most of it is Gnome anyway, they didn't even change the icon for the file manager from Nautilus to Thunar
Get Dropbox and an extra 250 mb http://db.tt/wAizqw0

User avatar
monkeyboy
Level 5
Level 5
Posts: 791
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 11:30 am

Re: Why not merge with LMDE?

Post by monkeyboy » Mon Mar 21, 2011 11:11 pm

One of the things that folks with download caps and/or slow access speeds object to is package size creep. If a new combo package was significantly large then the current options there would probably be even more objections. Lets face it its hard to keep everybody happy.
If you don't like it, make something better
If you can't make something better, adapt
If you can't do either ball your panties up and cry.

Complaining is like masticating most anyone can do it.
However doing it in public is really hardcore.

Borsook
Level 3
Level 3
Posts: 127
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 5:48 am

Re: Why not merge with LMDE?

Post by Borsook » Tue Mar 22, 2011 11:17 am

cpatrick08 wrote:
TBABill wrote:What do you mean by merge with LMDE? It's a standalone offering not based on Ubuntu. Just trying to understand or clarify what you mean.
i think the original poster meant put both on the same ISO letting the user choose between which one they want to install
Yes, I meant one common install .iso, sure it would meant bigger size, but let's face it - at 900mb it is not for the faint of bandwidth anyway, plus thanks to rolling nature it does not have to be re-downloaded. Without autologin the user could choose the DE at the start, the only thing that remains is modifying the installer... but a chance for such modification is the biggest boon from not using Ubuntu's installer.

User avatar
Hezy
Level 2
Level 2
Posts: 95
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 6:09 pm
Location: Israel
Contact:

Re: Why not merge with LMDE?

Post by Hezy » Tue Mar 22, 2011 2:38 pm

jeffreyC wrote:Makes a lot of sense to me as most of it is Gnome anyway, they didn't even change the icon for the file manager from Nautilus to Thunar
True. this is another small bug in the LMDE Xfce theme, but I think it's the Faenza icon theme to blame. It actually has an icon for Thunar (look for it in the settings menu), but for what should have been a generic "file manager" they use a Nautilus.

This is only one small example to the fact that Faenza is broken.
keep on rockin' in the free world

[https://github.com/hezy]

Post Reply

Return to “Xfce”