Worried about Security with your cellphone?

Chat about just about anything else
User avatar
AZgl1500
Level 13
Level 13
Posts: 4576
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2015 3:20 am
Location: Oklahoma where the wind comes sweeping down the plains
Contact:

Worried about Security with your cellphone?

Post by AZgl1500 »

just encrypt it twice, that ought to do it
and you won't have to worry about sitting on it and breaking the phone. :)

https://interestingengineering.com/sams ... s-military

samsung-galaxy-s20_resize_md.jpg
Linux Mint 19.3 Cinnamon

User avatar
Portreve
Level 9
Level 9
Posts: 2801
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2011 12:03 am
Location: Florida

Re: Worried about Security with your cellphone?

Post by Portreve »

“This smart phone will self-destruct in 5 seconds. Good luck, Jim.”
Please remember to mark your fixed problem [SOLVED].

Running Linux Mint Cinnamon 19.3.

Judge a man by his questions rather than his answers.
— Voltaire

User avatar
AZgl1500
Level 13
Level 13
Posts: 4576
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2015 3:20 am
Location: Oklahoma where the wind comes sweeping down the plains
Contact:

Re: Worried about Security with your cellphone?

Post by AZgl1500 »

Portreve wrote:
Thu May 21, 2020 7:16 pm
“This smart phone will self-destruct in 5 seconds. Good luck, Jim.”
:mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:
Linux Mint 19.3 Cinnamon

Charlie
Level 5
Level 5
Posts: 514
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2017 10:09 am
Location: Eng-er-land

Re: Worried about Security with your cellphone?

Post by Charlie »

I always buy rugged phones but not that spec. My current handset is rugged and can withstand a car being driven over it, it's slim, but still manages to be heavy. It has a built in battery though which I hate.

With my life it needs to be rugged. Stuff just deteriorates around me due to the damp/salty environment. I have had steel beds collapse due to corrosion. The bloke that installed my sat system, motorised dish, said he had not seen anything like it.

I have a wooden bed now and I treat it like you would a boat and use special "marine grade" screws instead of the ones supplied.

I also live like a pig, so there's that. The phone has to keep out dirt and grime and the phone is also waterproof.

User avatar
AZgl1500
Level 13
Level 13
Posts: 4576
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2015 3:20 am
Location: Oklahoma where the wind comes sweeping down the plains
Contact:

Re: Worried about Security with your cellphone?

Post by AZgl1500 »

Charlie wrote:
Thu May 21, 2020 7:38 pm
I always buy rugged phones but not that spec. My current handset is rugged and can withstand a car being driven over it, it's slim, but still manages to be heavy. It has a built in battery though which I hate.
Curious about which phone you bought....
I have always said, "I will never buy a phone if the battery cannot be replaced".....
and then my Samsung Note4 died and I had to find a replacement....
I won't buy new, so ended up with a Samsung Note8 which has an internal battery....
......... so far, so good up to now though.

I installed an app called "MacroDroid" which monitors the battery voltage and lets me know when it is down to 35% so I can put it back on charge.... and I wrote a 2nd macro which kicks in at 87% and says "Battery Charge..... Remove Charger"

it vocalizes both of those messages...
the thought is, if I never run it down to zero volts, and never push it to 100% charge, the battery's lifespan should be extended.... at least that is what I have read from the folks who make the battery.


Image
Linux Mint 19.3 Cinnamon

Charlie
Level 5
Level 5
Posts: 514
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2017 10:09 am
Location: Eng-er-land

Re: Worried about Security with your cellphone?

Post by Charlie »

That's a good trick. I'm not that careful probably because I buy cheap, but batteries I like to be able to remove and replace. I usually buy extra to carry around. Plus when the battery is forked you can easily swap it out.

User avatar
Portreve
Level 9
Level 9
Posts: 2801
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2011 12:03 am
Location: Florida

Re: Worried about Security with your cellphone?

Post by Portreve »

If people here are really concerned about privacy and security, they should be using Purism's Librem 5. No AOSP distro competes with it, and certainly no other maker's release does, either. It's a bit hard to take seriously people who are like, “Oh, I'm very concerned about my security but I'm still running Android.”

Just saying.
Please remember to mark your fixed problem [SOLVED].

Running Linux Mint Cinnamon 19.3.

Judge a man by his questions rather than his answers.
— Voltaire

Pippin
Level 4
Level 4
Posts: 344
Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2017 11:14 am
Location: The Shire

Re: Worried about Security with your cellphone?

Post by Pippin »

Purism's Librem 5 is out of reach for many...
Peer review = Ossification of current assumptions, the censorship of competing hypotheses.

Mathematical proofs = Elegant consistencies within a synthetic man-made universe.
Models are not reality, no matter how elegant.

Lady Fitzgerald
Level 4
Level 4
Posts: 372
Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2020 3:12 pm
Location: AZ, SSA (Squabbling States of America)

Re: Worried about Security with your cellphone?

Post by Lady Fitzgerald »

Portreve wrote:
Fri May 22, 2020 12:12 pm
...It's a bit hard to take seriously people who are like, “Oh, I'm very concerned about my security but I'm still running Android.”...
And that's a major reason why I don't have a "smart" phone.
Jeannie

Linux Mint Cinnamon 19.3
Lenovo B50 15" notebook

User avatar
Portreve
Level 9
Level 9
Posts: 2801
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2011 12:03 am
Location: Florida

Re: Worried about Security with your cellphone?

Post by Portreve »

Pippin wrote:
Fri May 22, 2020 12:17 pm
Purism's Librem 5 is out of reach for many...
Well, while I can appreciate the financial aspects of this, it's just like somebody saying "I want a PB&J but I don't want to buy peanut butter."
Please remember to mark your fixed problem [SOLVED].

Running Linux Mint Cinnamon 19.3.

Judge a man by his questions rather than his answers.
— Voltaire

User avatar
Moem
Level 20
Level 20
Posts: 11052
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2015 9:14 am
Location: The Netherlands
Contact:

Re: Worried about Security with your cellphone?

Post by Moem »

It's a lot more like someone saying "... but I can't afford peanut butter".
Image

If your issue is solved, kindly indicate that by editing the first post in the topic, and adding [SOLVED] to the title. Thanks!

Lady Fitzgerald
Level 4
Level 4
Posts: 372
Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2020 3:12 pm
Location: AZ, SSA (Squabbling States of America)

Re: Worried about Security with your cellphone?

Post by Lady Fitzgerald »

Moem wrote:
Fri May 22, 2020 1:21 pm
It's a lot more like someone saying "... but I can't afford peanut butter".
Or, in my case, the benefits of peanut butter do not outweigh its disadvantages and cost.
Jeannie

Linux Mint Cinnamon 19.3
Lenovo B50 15" notebook

User avatar
Portreve
Level 9
Level 9
Posts: 2801
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2011 12:03 am
Location: Florida

Re: Worried about Security with your cellphone?

Post by Portreve »

Moem and Lady Fitzgerald:

I'm not referring to the financial aspect of this because I wasn't talking about folks who can't afford an $800 phone. I'm referring to people in general who like to act as though they're being very security conscious simply by trying to restrict through some means their factory install of Android, or their use of an AOSP release plus nonstandard mechanism for installation of highly specific apps.

I'm not arguing against the affordability argument you're trying to present. There is a significant difference between my analogy and your rephrasing of it.
Please remember to mark your fixed problem [SOLVED].

Running Linux Mint Cinnamon 19.3.

Judge a man by his questions rather than his answers.
— Voltaire

User avatar
Moem
Level 20
Level 20
Posts: 11052
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2015 9:14 am
Location: The Netherlands
Contact:

Re: Worried about Security with your cellphone?

Post by Moem »

Well, I can't afford to spend the equivalent of $800 on a phone. Or maybe I can but then I'd have to cut too many other things out. I see myself as fairly privacy-conscious... more so than you, for example. No Facebook (not even a 'deleted' account), no WhatsApp. Yet I own a (pretty much Google-free) Android. Does that mean that you can't take me seriously? So be it.

Basically, I'm not sure what your point is.
Image

If your issue is solved, kindly indicate that by editing the first post in the topic, and adding [SOLVED] to the title. Thanks!

Lady Fitzgerald
Level 4
Level 4
Posts: 372
Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2020 3:12 pm
Location: AZ, SSA (Squabbling States of America)

Re: Worried about Security with your cellphone?

Post by Lady Fitzgerald »

Portreve wrote:
Fri May 22, 2020 1:48 pm
Moem and Lady Fitzgerald:

I'm not referring to the financial aspect of this because I wasn't talking about folks who can't afford an $800 phone. I'm referring to people in general who like to act as though they're being very security conscious simply by trying to restrict through some means their factory install of Android, or their use of an AOSP release plus nonstandard mechanism for installation of highly specific apps.

I'm not arguing against the affordability argument you're trying to present. There is a significant difference between my analogy and your rephrasing of it.
Some things are being taken out of context here (apples to kumquats with a few pears thrown in). I earlier agreed with what you had to say about people who claimed to be concerned about security yet continued to use Android phones by saying that was a major reason I don't have a smartphone (btw, iOS is no security prize, either).

My next comment was a response to what Moem had to say about not being to afford a certain kind of smartphone. I was obliquely saying that being able to afford it isn't always the reason for being unwilling to pay for the phone by pointing out that the advantages of it may not outweigh the cost and/or disadvantages.

Btw, not being able to afford something that would correct a problem (or not being able to justify the expense) is a valid argument for not buying that something and sticking with a less desirable solution. You may not have been referring to the financial aspect but it is something others do have to consider.
Jeannie

Linux Mint Cinnamon 19.3
Lenovo B50 15" notebook

Lady Fitzgerald
Level 4
Level 4
Posts: 372
Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2020 3:12 pm
Location: AZ, SSA (Squabbling States of America)

Re: Worried about Security with your cellphone?

Post by Lady Fitzgerald »

Moem wrote:
Fri May 22, 2020 3:07 pm
...I see myself as fairly privacy-conscious... more so than you, for example. No Facebook (not even a 'deleted' account), no WhatsApp. Yet I own a (pretty much Google-free) Android...
You are aware that Android is sponsored by Google? Even if you strip the obvious Google apps from Android, I would be surprised if Google didn't still have some way to monetize your use of it or otherwise compromise your security in some way.

I'm keeping my eye on Linux based phones, such as the Pine phone, but I don't feel they are ready for "prime time" yet (leastwise, not for me). Then there is the cost of the phones themselves and the data plans needed to use them. I'm retired and have no real need for a smart phone. It would be nice to have one but the benefits would not justify the long term costs for me, even if security wasn't an issue. My little $12 talk only flip phone and a $5/month pay as you go plan meets my needs just fine. This applies to me only; others may (and probably do) need smart phones enough to justify the costs and security risks.
Jeannie

Linux Mint Cinnamon 19.3
Lenovo B50 15" notebook

rene
Level 15
Level 15
Posts: 5876
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 6:58 pm

Re: Worried about Security with your cellphone?

Post by rene »

Lady Fitzgerald wrote:
Fri May 22, 2020 3:38 pm
You are aware that Android is sponsored by Google?
Noticed those sort of comments before on this forum. Android is not "sponsored by Google", Android is a full-on Google-product, plain and simple.

User avatar
Moem
Level 20
Level 20
Posts: 11052
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2015 9:14 am
Location: The Netherlands
Contact:

Re: Worried about Security with your cellphone?

Post by Moem »

Lady Fitzgerald wrote:
Fri May 22, 2020 3:38 pm
Moem wrote:
Fri May 22, 2020 3:07 pm
...I see myself as fairly privacy-conscious... more so than you, for example. No Facebook (not even a 'deleted' account), no WhatsApp. Yet I own a (pretty much Google-free) Android...
You are aware that Android is sponsored by Google? Even if you strip the obvious Google apps from Android, I would be surprised if Google didn't still have some way to monetize your use of it or otherwise compromise your security in some way.
Google built Android. But I did not strip the obvious Google apps from Android; rather, my Android was installed through LineageOS, which allows it to never have had those apps in the first place.
Yet, we can't be completely certain, like you are saying, and that's why I'm saying it's pretty much Google-free, not completely and utterly Google-free.

Ubuntu Touch, on the other hand, does appear to be Google-free. Which is one of the big reasons why I'm currently trying that out. If you want to see how that's turning out: viewtopic.php?f=61&t=320295
Image

If your issue is solved, kindly indicate that by editing the first post in the topic, and adding [SOLVED] to the title. Thanks!

User avatar
Portreve
Level 9
Level 9
Posts: 2801
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2011 12:03 am
Location: Florida

Re: Worried about Security with your cellphone?

Post by Portreve »

Moem wrote:
Fri May 22, 2020 3:07 pm
Well, I can't afford to spend the equivalent of $800 on a phone. Or maybe I can but then I'd have to cut too many other things out. I see myself as fairly privacy-conscious... more so than you, for example. No Facebook (not even a 'deleted' account), no WhatsApp. Yet I own a (pretty much Google-free) Android. Does that mean that you can't take me seriously? So be it.
It may not be your intent, but you come across as someone more motivated by a hatred of all-things-Google than privacy itself. I'll take a wild stab and assume that's not your intended self-representation, but nevertheless that's the impression I get.

I take great pains to ensure that anything which I might wish never to be known by third-parties is indeed kept secure beyond any reasonable ability by anyone to discover. Consequentially, anything for which my usage of Google may serve as a conduit are things which simply do not fall into that category. Yes, it's a trade-off in a sense that I allow Google to know of my physical whereabouts, about my physical movements, aspects of my personal health (I use a Samsung Galaxy Active2 smart watch), primarily work-related events in my life, etc., but I regard all that as being trivial. Thanks to constantly on-orbit surveillance satellites, I regard my movements and whereabouts as being already known by governmental actors, as well as AT&T, so I really do not give a 🚒 whether Google also knows about it in parallel. All the rest of my records are either known or immediately knowable upon first desire by my own government (along with everyone else who lives in the U.S. and, thanks to Five Eyes / Nine Eyes / Fourteen Eyes, pretty much you and everyone else anywhere in the world as well).

Now, switching gears here (because I think this has now been beaten to death) another reason I don't try to rush out and buy the L5 is it takes two to tango where communication security is concerned. Since I can say with certainty that I do not know anybody in my own personal life (whether friends or co-workers) who can possibly be the least bit bothered to shore up and secure any aspect of their communications, it would be futile for me to switch to entirely secure communications means (for example, Signal) because I would then simply find myself alone. Attempting to, shall we say, "force the matter" would likely end my employment and all my friendships.

As they said in the movie Apollo 13, “Well, if the chutes don't open, what's the point?”
Please remember to mark your fixed problem [SOLVED].

Running Linux Mint Cinnamon 19.3.

Judge a man by his questions rather than his answers.
— Voltaire

User avatar
AZgl1500
Level 13
Level 13
Posts: 4576
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2015 3:20 am
Location: Oklahoma where the wind comes sweeping down the plains
Contact:

Re: Worried about Security with your cellphone?

Post by AZgl1500 »

Portreve wrote:
Fri May 22, 2020 12:12 pm
If people here are really concerned about privacy and security, they should be using Purism's Librem 5. No AOSP distro competes with it, and certainly no other maker's release does, either. It's a bit hard to take seriously people who are like, “Oh, I'm very concerned about my security but I'm still running Android.”

Just saying.
that phone, right now, is pure junk............

battery life is 2 hours??
My Samsung Note8 will give me 2 days of light use, about 14 hours of moderate use while roaming around town looking for addresses, occasional Facebook reading, etc.

https://www.techrepublic.com/article/li ... mer-ready/
Linux Mint 19.3 Cinnamon

Post Reply

Return to “Open chat”