open source succeeds where closed systems fail

Chat about just about anything else
User avatar
mike acker
Level 5
Level 5
Posts: 867
Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2013 6:29 pm
Location: Kalamazoo, MI

open source succeeds where closed systems fail

Postby mike acker » Mon Mar 24, 2014 8:27 am

I was reflecting again on the rise of Linux and the failure of os/2

I.P. might like this article
Half an operating system: The triumph and tragedy of OS/2

reflecting on this, as well as the rise of LibreOffice and Google Docs and thinking back on Torvalds wonderful book _Just for Fun_ I found myself wondering if closed systems would ever be viable in a market with mature open source software. closed systems have a bad habit of trying to close out their competition which may easily be their fatal mistake

other interesting reading is this the white flag over redmond?
1. ASUS M5A88-M motherboard and x64 AMD Phenom II X4 3.4GHz cpu; 4x4MB DDR3 RAM LMDE2/MINT Betsy Vers. 2.4.8 Kernel 3.16-0-4-AMD64
2. Rebuilt HP 4x2.8ghz AMD w/ Foxconn MoBo 1TB WD HD 2x4G RAM MINT 17.3 with Oracle Corp Virtual Box and Windoze 8.1 guest

User avatar
mike acker
Level 5
Level 5
Posts: 867
Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2013 6:29 pm
Location: Kalamazoo, MI

Re: open source succeeds where closed systems fail

Postby mike acker » Thu Mar 27, 2014 9:14 am

this morning's reading

Linux Foundation sees 80 percent of all commercial software development being based on open source

I see two key elements in this
1. open source products are more likely to be compatible
2. open source products are likely to be more secure

thoughts/comments ?
1. ASUS M5A88-M motherboard and x64 AMD Phenom II X4 3.4GHz cpu; 4x4MB DDR3 RAM LMDE2/MINT Betsy Vers. 2.4.8 Kernel 3.16-0-4-AMD64
2. Rebuilt HP 4x2.8ghz AMD w/ Foxconn MoBo 1TB WD HD 2x4G RAM MINT 17.3 with Oracle Corp Virtual Box and Windoze 8.1 guest


Return to “Open chat”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests