Forum rules
Do not post support questions here. Before you post read the forum rules. Topics in this forum are automatically closed 30 days after creation.
boot@Z390:~$ inxi -Fxz
System: Host: Z390 Kernel: 4.18.0-16-lowlatency x86_64 bits: 64 gcc: 7.3.0
Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.15.2 (Qt 5.12.0) Distro: KDE neon User Edition 5.15
using a low latency kernel will not profit you much if you don't play musical instruments hooked up to your computer. instead try a hardware enabled kernel
This has been my old reliable daily driver since around mid 2011 - came with Windows 7 (which drove me to linux) and RAID 0.
I started with SuSe and moved to Ubuntu and then to Mint. I could never get RAID 0 up and running until Nov of 14 when I discovered a Catweazel thread from 2013 that was basically a HOW TO. Ran with RAID 0 for a short while but did not see any significant performance bump so did a fresh install having been using the second SSD for data.
Catweazel's rig is definitely bad-a$$ - the PC equivalent to the 797HP Dodge Challenger Hellcat !
trytip wrote: ⤴Thu Mar 14, 2019 9:19 am
using a low latency kernel will not profit you much if you don't play musical instruments hooked up to your computer. instead try a hardware enabled kernel
Nonsense. I can run f@h at full tilt while I watch a video on my left screen through my left eye and play Microsoft Hearts on my right monitor in a 6-thread virtual machine through my right eye, all at once and without the system so much as hinting at the load.
"There is, ultimately, only one truth -- cogito, ergo sum -- everything else is an assumption." - Me, my swansong.
You won't be disappointed. The 9900K overclocks very nicely with just a few minor changes to the BIOS to get a consistent 5GHz across all cores at once
trytip wrote: ⤴Thu Mar 14, 2019 9:19 am
using a low latency kernel will not profit you much if you don't play musical instruments hooked up to your computer. instead try a hardware enabled kernel
Nonsense. I can run f@h at full tilt while I watch a video on my left screen through my left eye and play Microsoft Hearts on my right monitor in a 6-thread virtual machine through my right eye, all at once and without the system so much as hinting at the load.
i was speaking relatively to my reality of having a duo-core cpu. i know you got a nice hot & spicy cpu and at that speed any compatible kernel will work just fine for you. i get to test the newest kernels and software with arch and lately things are going in a very different way. i don't like what developers are doing, it seems they never learn. XFCE desktop is going through some major changes, the UI is getting uglier and performance even worse. today i had to downgrade compton window manager and i have to add it to my list of packages to hold back.
dbus
wine
kodi
thunar
thunar-archive-plugin
xfdesktop
compton
Ooh! Ooh! I love these kinds of threads! I mostly lurk on the forums since I read them while at work (between customers) and so I can't actually post/reply (too many customer interruptions)...so lots of lurking over the years. But this one, OMG I just had to get in on this one as soon as I got home today!
My hardware is now about 6(?) years old, I think. I chose the motherboard based upon reviews at the time saying it was super stable; I haven't been disappointed. My original graphics card all these years was a GTX770, which finally died about 2 months before the RTX series was released, and so was replaced with a GTX1080. The computer isn't a beast, but it does all the heavy stuff I throw at it without complaint. I am happy.
Your basic, generic, iMac 9.1 with Mint 19.0 Cinnamon installed. My daily driver and has worked like a champ. I turn on my main Windows 7 PC just a few times a year. The iMac isn't really upgradeable because to change anything you have to remove the screen! At least on the Macbook Pro you can just remove the bottom cover. I'm looking to get an older Macbook Pro 17 inch and upgrade to at least 8GB of RAM and a 500GB SSD. It'll be a screamer.
catweazel wrote: ⤴Wed Mar 13, 2019 6:32 am
There's nothing wrong with a lower-spec'd machine as long as it does what you need.
In fact I'd say he'd beat you silly in the "Eat My Non-waste of Computing- And Monetary Resources" thread. An i9-9900K with 32G and RTX 2080 to run a Linux desktop OS?
And the problem with that is what exactly? You have absolutely no idea what I do with my machines or why. That you can't fathom a reason for such equipment does not entail that there isn't one.
Out of curiosity what do you do with your machine?
rene wrote: ⤴Wed Mar 13, 2019 11:15 am
In fact I'd say he'd beat you silly in the "Eat My Non-waste of Computing- And Monetary Resources" thread. An i9-9900K with 32G and RTX 2080 to run a Linux desktop OS?
And the problem with that is what exactly? You have absolutely no idea what I do with my machines or why. That you can't fathom a reason for such equipment does not entail that there isn't one.
Out of curiosity what do you do with your machine?
I would like to know as well, if you're willing to tell us. Pretty please? Seeing your high end specs, I can imagine ALL kinds of possible uses for a rig like that. And I'm fascinated by what people do with their computers beyond web surfing and email. I didn't have the money to build a rig like yours six years ago when I built mine, but holy cow I sure wanted to! Been salivating at the thought of doing it on my next build, if I can afford to. Unfortunately I keep acquiring medical bills instead, which doesn't help me save up for a Core i9. Stupid bills.
Rene, it's not the OS that Catweazel runs that require specs like that. It's the programs he runs, and how many at the same time, that makes it necessary for specs like that.
catweazel wrote: ⤴Wed Mar 13, 2019 5:12 pm
And the problem with that is what exactly? You have absolutely no idea what I do with my machines or why. That you can't fathom a reason for such equipment does not entail that there isn't one.
Out of curiosity what do you do with your machine?
I would like to know as well, if you're willing to tell us. Pretty please? Seeing your high end specs, I can imagine ALL kinds of possible uses for a rig like that. And I'm fascinated by what people do with their computers beyond web surfing and email. I didn't have the money to build a rig like yours six years ago when I built mine, but holy cow I sure wanted to! Been salivating at the thought of doing it on my next build, if I can afford to. Unfortunately I keep acquiring medical bills instead, which doesn't help me save up for a Core i9. Stupid bills.
Rene, it's not the OS that Catweazel runs that require specs like that. It's the programs he runs, and how many at the same time, that makes it necessary for specs like that.
Good Grief!
I am getting my i9 9900k because I have a 1gig per second internet connection. I use Plex Media Server and share with family around the states. I run video and audio editing programs, surf the net on my 22" monitor, and watch movies on my 46" monitor all at the same time!
I purchased a Gateway FX P-7805u gaming laptop several months before Win7 came out. I pieced together an old P5Q socket775 machine for a while but fried now. Laptop still working but struggling. With upgrading to an i9 9900k system I should be good for the next 10 to 15 years. It may be a monster right now, but what will it be in 10 years?
catweazel wrote: ⤴Wed Mar 13, 2019 5:12 pm
And the problem with that is what exactly? You have absolutely no idea what I do with my machines or why. That you can't fathom a reason for such equipment does not entail that there isn't one.
Out of curiosity what do you do with your machine?
I would like to know as well, if you're willing to tell us. Pretty please? Seeing your high end specs, I can imagine ALL kinds of possible uses for a rig like that. And I'm fascinated by what people do with their computers beyond web surfing and email.
I do a lot of video transcoding and software development that requires compiling lots of source code or working with huge databases, plus lots of experimentation that requires frequent restores from backup, which I prefer to take as little time as possible, but more than anything, I abhor both lag and tearing. I want snappy! And I want it now!
Besides that, I can afford it
"There is, ultimately, only one truth -- cogito, ergo sum -- everything else is an assumption." - Me, my swansong.
I would like to know as well, if you're willing to tell us. Pretty please? Seeing your high end specs, I can imagine ALL kinds of possible uses for a rig like that. And I'm fascinated by what people do with their computers beyond web surfing and email.
I do a lot of video transcoding and software development that requires compiling lots of source code or working with huge databases, plus lots of experimentation that requires frequent restores from backup, which I prefer to take as little time as possible, but more than anything, I abhor both lag and tearing. I want snappy! And I want it now!
Besides that, I can afford it
That's all I wanted to know because I was doing the same with my now gone to a younger family member for gaming and editing i7-8700k.
I've used Intel chips for decades only swapping to AMD back in 2003, then back to Intel again with Xeon's.
This time I tried a Ryzen 7 2700X and skipped Intel to see if AMD had caught up. I'm impressed. Threadripper next me thinks
Well, at least you're getting the most from your machine, I LOL at those who buy high end hardware just to game then sell it six months down the line because they just wanted to put a benchmark on the web.
If you can handle the flak that may come your way with that comment is up to you
Basset-Hound wrote: ⤴Tue Apr 02, 2019 6:44 am
That's all I wanted to know because I was doing the same with my now gone to a younger family member for gaming and editing i7-8700k.
I've used Intel chips for decades only swapping to AMD back in 2003, then back to Intel again with Xeon's.
This time I tried a Ryzen 7 2700X and skipped Intel to see if AMD had caught up. I'm impressed. Threadripper next me thinks
I have an 1800X and a 2700X sitting here. My next rig would have been a threadripper but my 1800X motherboard blew recently and while I could afford it, I couldn't justify a threadripper so I grabbed the Intel. Constant running at 5GHz it's freaky fast. I noted that AMD didn't relase a 2800X this time around so I assume that they're keeping it open to leapfrog Intel again.
"There is, ultimately, only one truth -- cogito, ergo sum -- everything else is an assumption." - Me, my swansong.
Basset-Hound wrote: ⤴Tue Apr 02, 2019 6:44 am
That's all I wanted to know because I was doing the same with my now gone to a younger family member for gaming and editing i7-8700k.
I've used Intel chips for decades only swapping to AMD back in 2003, then back to Intel again with Xeon's.
This time I tried a Ryzen 7 2700X and skipped Intel to see if AMD had caught up. I'm impressed. Threadripper next me thinks
I have an 1800X and a 2700X sitting here. My next rig would have been a threadripper but my 1800X motherboard blew recently and while I could afford it, I couldn't justify a threadripper so I grabbed the Intel. Constant running at 5GHz it's freaky fast. I noted that AMD didn't relase a 2800X this time around so I assume that they're keeping it open to leapfrog Intel again.
I nearly went with the 1800X but I'm glad I waited for the 2700X. Running it on an Asus Prime X470 Pro that has just had it's bios updated for the next gen AMD CPU's. It's been rock solid. RAM sits @3600MHz out of the box with XMP enabled. something I didn't experience with the i7-8700k when overclocked. System freeze up's were constant. Perhpas it was some of the software I was using, probably Windows 10 and some of the updates caused issues. I'll never know because I just couldn't be bothered tinkering any longer to get it stable after having my head in the bios for so long
I've seen the allged specs for AMD's next offering that's on the way in a couple of months.
The 3700X will have 12 cores and run @ 4GHz with a boost to 5GHz.
If AMD can pull this off then Kudos to them. Intel are now focusing on GPU's with staff from both AMD and Nvidia jumping ship to help them achieve their goals.
It's about time we saw some competition in the hardware field
I would like to know as well, if you're willing to tell us. Pretty please? Seeing your high end specs, I can imagine ALL kinds of possible uses for a rig like that. And I'm fascinated by what people do with their computers beyond web surfing and email.
I do a lot of video transcoding and software development that requires compiling lots of source code or working with huge databases, plus lots of experimentation that requires frequent restores from backup, which I prefer to take as little time as possible, but more than anything, I abhor both lag and tearing. I want snappy! And I want it now!
Besides that, I can afford it
Neat, sounds extremely interesting and fun. And experimentation is a blast! My current experimental tinkering is with Arduino and Raspberry Pi.
LOL @ "I want snappy! And I want it now!" I can relate to that. Lag drives me nuts. The computer at work is very laggy and I swear it's going to eventually cause me to have a brain aneurysm. My cell phone is snappier!
Basset-Hound wrote: ⤴Tue Apr 02, 2019 7:33 am
I nearly went with the 1800X but I'm glad I waited for the 2700X. Running it on an Asus Prime X470 Pro that has just had it's bios updated for the next gen AMD CPU's. It's been rock solid. RAM sits @3600MHz out of the box with XMP enabled. something I didn't experience with the i7-8700k when overclocked. System freeze up's were constant. Perhpas it was some of the software I was using, probably Windows 10 and some of the updates caused issues. I'll never know because I just couldn't be bothered tinkering any longer to get it stable after having my head in the bios for so long
It was more than likely a BIOS issue. I have a number of OSen installed and Windwoes 10 runs fine on a permanent 5GHz overclock.
Basset-Hound wrote:
I've seen the allged specs for AMD's next offering that's on the way in a couple of months.
The 3700X will have 12 cores and run @ 4GHz with a boost to 5GHz.
If AMD can pull this off then Kudos to them. Intel are now focusing on GPU's with staff from both AMD and Nvidia jumping ship to help them achieve their goals.
It's about time we saw some competition in the hardware field
The problem with Intel is that they can't produce 10nm chips properly, and they rehash previous generations and label them as a new generation. The i9 9xxx series is a reworked 8xxxx. Then they have the cheek to charge a high premium, and when that doesn't work, they do this. lol - unbelievable, but apparently true.
...the chip company is asking system builders to bid for the chips in an online auction.
No warranty either.
"There is, ultimately, only one truth -- cogito, ergo sum -- everything else is an assumption." - Me, my swansong.
Fuzzy Penquin wrote: ⤴Tue Apr 02, 2019 10:15 pm
LOL @ "I want snappy! And I want it now!" I can relate to that. Lag drives me nuts. The computer at work is very laggy and I swear it's going to eventually cause me to have a brain aneurysm. My cell phone is snappier!
You may have just articulated a new truism... This article illustrates how much smartphones are blurring the lines to laptops.
"There is, ultimately, only one truth -- cogito, ergo sum -- everything else is an assumption." - Me, my swansong.