Forum rules
Do not post support questions here. Before you post read the forum rules. Topics in this forum are automatically closed 30 days after creation.
MurphCID wrote: ⤴Sat Aug 20, 2022 1:30 pm
Can you really run Debian on a laptop and not have firmware issues? Also would plain jane Debian (KDE NOT Gnome) work well?
I guess you could with the non-free ISO to get you a fighting chance of a network connection to continue the install. GNOME Debian is the main one, even KDE from them wants to drag in GNOME packages. You'd probably want to enable backports for your HP and the other fairly new laptops you have. I'd certainly need to use backports with mine.
I’ll tell you a DNS joke but be advised, it could take up to 24 hours for everyone to get it.
MurphCID wrote: ⤴Sat Aug 20, 2022 1:30 pm
Can you really run Debian on a laptop and not have firmware issues? Also would plain jane Debian (KDE NOT Gnome) work well?
I guess you could with the non-free ISO to get you a fighting chance of a network connection to continue the install. GNOME Debian is the main one, even KDE from them wants to drag in GNOME packages. You'd probably want to enable backports for your HP and the other fairly new laptops you have. I'd certainly need to use backports with mine.
No Debian would only go on the T480s. The others run Mint 21 or LMDE5.
MurphCID wrote: ⤴Sat Aug 20, 2022 1:30 pm
Can you really run Debian on a laptop and not have firmware issues? Also would plain jane Debian (KDE NOT Gnome) work well?
I guess you could with the non-free ISO to get you a fighting chance of a network connection to continue the install. GNOME Debian is the main one, even KDE from them wants to drag in GNOME packages. You'd probably want to enable backports for your HP and the other fairly new laptops you have. I'd certainly need to use backports with mine.
I am a little out of my depth here but I have tested Debian quite a bit on various laptops but mostly Lenovo and have had mixed results concerning firmware issues. For full disclosure most of my testing has been with Debian netinstl testing - not stable. Interestingly Debian advises to install stable netinstl and then upgrade to testing . . . . I guess that is a good idea but I never do it that way and I am not sure why that is recommended. I have installed both the free and non-free (firmware .iso versions). Personally I like the free version and if I need to install some missing firmware I install that as needed using a firmware .deb package ( I have accumulated and saved several of these packages and keep them on hand but seldom need them). As far as backports are concerned I am not sure exactly how they relate to firmware unless they are needed to upgrade to new firmware package. I never use backports because I am on testing and my understanding is
packages in the stable-backports suite are taken from Debian testing
at least that is what the Debian WiKi says.
I do edit
deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ bookworm main non-free contrib
6 deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian/ bookworm main non-free contrib
7
8 deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security bookworm-security main contrib non-free
9 deb-src http://security.debian.org/debian-security bookworm-security main contrib non-free
But as a hack I may be missing something which would be par for the course.
Looks good to me. BTW the Darter Pro has a constant and annoying issue with USB-C/Thunderbolt, if I have booted it, and then insert the external drive it does not see the drive. If I reboot with the drive still in the laptop is sees the drive. It only happens on this particular laptop which is a Darp7 (second gen Darter) from System 76. It did not have this issue under Mint 20.3. I might have to either roll back to 20.3 or re-install POP!_OS on this particular laptop.
Now the Darter Pro (#2) will not see any USB-C device no matter how many reboots. This is annoying. It is the only one that has that issue. I might put Mint 20.3 back on it today, or POP!_OS depending on my mood.
"A few months ago, [Matt] realized he needed another battery for his Thinkpad X230T. The original battery would barely last 10 minutes, and he wanted a battery that would last an entire plane flight. When his new battery arrived, he installed it only to find a disturbing message displayed during startup: “The system does not support batteries that are not genuine Lenovo-made or authorized.” The battery was chipped, and now [Matt] had to figure out a way around this."
John_B wrote: ⤴Fri Aug 26, 2022 1:13 am"A few months ago, [Matt] realized he needed another battery for his Thinkpad X230T. The original battery would barely last 10 minutes, and he wanted a battery that would last an entire plane flight. When his new battery arrived, he installed it only to find a disturbing message displayed during startup: “The system does not support batteries that are not genuine Lenovo-made or authorized.” The battery was chipped, and now [Matt] had to figure out a way around this."
John_B wrote: ⤴Fri Aug 26, 2022 1:13 am"A few months ago, [Matt] realized he needed another battery for his Thinkpad X230T. The original battery would barely last 10 minutes, and he wanted a battery that would last an entire plane flight. When his new battery arrived, he installed it only to find a disturbing message displayed during startup: “The system does not support batteries that are not genuine Lenovo-made or authorized.” The battery was chipped, and now [Matt] had to figure out a way around this."
Linux Mint 20.3 Cinnamon x64-bits on Panasonic ToughBook CF-C1 | Dell Latitude E6410 | HP Elite Book 8540P.
Debian 12 Gnome on a MSI H61M-P25 (B3) PC & on a Dell Latitude E6410 & HP EliteBook 8540p Laptops.
LMDE 6 on a Panasonic ToughBook CF-C1 Laptop.
Bodhi Linux 7 on a HP Compaq DC5750 Small Form Factor PC.
Windows 11 on a Intel DH55TC PC.
John_B wrote: ⤴Fri Aug 26, 2022 1:13 am"A few months ago, [Matt] realized he needed another battery for his Thinkpad X230T. The original battery would barely last 10 minutes, and he wanted a battery that would last an entire plane flight. When his new battery arrived, he installed it only to find a disturbing message displayed during startup: “The system does not support batteries that are not genuine Lenovo-made or authorized.” The battery was chipped, and now [Matt] had to figure out a way around this."
Perhaps others who have such machines may get more out of the article,
How?
By reading through it and its included links.
I missed the links. When I did try to read through the links, all of it went completely over my head except for this disclaimer near the end:
"do not attempt EC firmware modification at home unless you understand what you are doing. If something goes wrong with an EC update, there is a high likelihood of bricking your laptop, the only recourse being connecting to the EC via JTAG. I will not be held responsible for this. You should also understand that poor quality lithium ion cells can cause fires, as has been seen in the recent spate of hoverboard fires. I will also not be held responsible for this."
There is also the little matter of not having the test equipment needed and knowing how to use it.
Methinks I'll pass and Lenovo will remain on my Specialized High Intensity Training list.
Jeannie
To ensure the safety of your data, you have to be proactive, not reactive, so, back it up!
I missed the links. When I did try to read through the links, all of it went completely over my head except for this disclaimer near the end:
"do not attempt EC firmware modification at home unless you understand what you are doing. If something goes wrong with an EC update, there is a high likelihood of bricking your laptop, the only recourse being connecting to the EC via JTAG. I will not be held responsible for this. You should also understand that poor quality lithium ion cells can cause fires, as has been seen in the recent spate of hoverboard fires. I will also not be held responsible for this."
There is also the little matter of not having the test equipment needed and knowing how to use it.
Methinks I'll pass and Lenovo will remain on my Specialized High Intensity Training list.
I concur with your essential approach; conduct pre-purchase research to avoid such arbitrary restrictions on consumer choice and budgets. In particular, once such an affected notebook and its proper batteries reach EOL, what then? Scrap an otherwise useful laptop? Nay.
Being an autodidact and a skeptic, I'll never invest in bait & switch hardware. There are plenty of older, user serviceable notebooks around (a service guide is still available for the one in my signature) that meet my modest needs and whose Linux support is mature.
LM 21 Cinnamon | Dell Latitude E4310 (A15) | Core i5 560m | Mobile Intel QS57 Express | 8 GB RAM | CT2000MX500SSD1 | ST2000LM003 HN-M201RAD in an S251SMU33EP | Intel AC 7260 | ECUSB3S11 (NEC / Renasis 720202) 34mm ExpressCard