linuxviolin wrote:
I don't think I "trying to put words into your mouth". Sorry, I don't buy the "different context" idea. Windows XP and 7 are not bad products and we could give you many/several examples where Windows is better than Linux but I will not make it now, I have already done this sometimes in several places but I am too lazy for starting again this, I'm became sick with this... Oh and a bug *IS* a bug, or a stupid developer *IS* a stupid developer, maintenance *IS* maintenance, no matter the OS, period. Btw, I don't really seek to defend Windows vs Linux....
About the letter, I'm sorry but yes, the guy is right. Linux is buggy, yes, and unfortunately more and more, but I have never said Windows was/is perfect. It has also its problems. About the libs and apps, you are wrong. Stability?
And you know in Windows you can have the last version of an app although you don't modify the base system, system libs? Even in "old" versions of Windows, e.g. in the times of Win 7 you can do it with the old XP, you can have the last app versions, you can even sometimes have two versions of the same app. Try this in Linux...
Even in an enterprise distro as Red Hat, or one of its clones, with long support etc like Windows, you must stay with old versions because the system libs... Without talk about the many years of support compared to Linux... Sorry, but this is not rants, but facts, even if you don't want accept them. And the guy is quite qualified about computers, programming etc and used Linux and other Operating Systems since about 20 years, even more I guess...
So, sorry for you but he is NOT a "newbie", not at all, at the contrary, he is a quite advanced user.
But I don't want to go further in this way. I'm sick by all this debate. Sick to see and read some commentaries by some, sick to see as people are silly, sick to see the quality of the modern OSs and the quality of the contemporary software, etc... The futur will be probably sad, at least.