[SOLVED] Getting message about lack of Drivers for AMD Picasso

nandordena · Post by **nandordena** » Tue Mar 15, 2022 3:28 pm

System:
  Kernel: 5.13.0-35-generic x86_64 bits: 64 compiler: N/A 
  Desktop: Cinnamon 5.2.7 Distro: Linux Mint 20.3 Una 
  base: Ubuntu 20.04 focal 
Graphics:
  Device-1: AMD Picasso vendor: Huawei driver: amdgpu v: kernel 
  bus ID: 03:00.0 
  Display: x11 server: X.Org 1.20.13 driver: amdgpu,ati 
  unloaded: fbdev,modesetting,vesa resolution: 2160x1440~60Hz 
  OpenGL: renderer: llvmpipe (LLVM 13.0.0 256 bits) 
  v: 4.5 Mesa 22.0.0 - kisak-mesa PPA direct render: Yes

[FIXED] ( TNX SMG)

Conclusion:
Conflict in the loading of the software source.

Solution:
- Update Kernel
- Remove all video drives sources and try one by one, looking for the good one

Post by **SMG** » Tue Mar 15, 2022 3:59 pm

nandordena wrote: ⤴Tue Mar 15, 2022 3:28 pm Dont work for me:

Welcome to the forum, nandordena.

The other topic you referenced has different hardware than you have. Please give us the full information about your install by entering this command in a terminal: inxi -Fxxxrz
Click </> from the mini toolbar above the textbox where you type your reply and then place your cursor between the code tags and paste the results of the command between the code tags [code]Results[/code]. This will let us know how Mint sees your hardware.

nandordena · Post by **nandordena** » Fri Mar 18, 2022 7:32 am

Full system info:

Code: Select all

System:
  Kernel: 5.13.0-35-generic x86_64 bits: 64 compiler: N/A 
  Desktop: Cinnamon 5.2.7 wm: muffin 5.2.1 dm: LightDM 1.30.0 
  Distro: Linux Mint 20.3 Una base: Ubuntu 20.04 focal 
Machine:
  Type: Laptop System: HUAWEI product: HN-WX9X v: M1200 serial: <filter> 
  Mobo: HUAWEI model: HN-WX9X-PCB v: M1200 serial: <filter> UEFI: HUAWEI 
  v: 1.13 date: 09/04/2020 
Battery:
  ID-1: BAT0 charge: 38.7 Wh condition: 38.9/41.2 Wh (94%) volts: 12.9/11.4 
  model: DYNAPACK HB4593J6ECW type: Li-ion serial: <filter> status: Unknown 
  cycles: 91 
CPU:
  Topology: Quad Core model: AMD Ryzen 7 3700U with Radeon Vega Mobile Gfx 
  bits: 64 type: MT MCP arch: Zen+ rev: 1 L2 cache: 2048 KiB 
  flags: avx avx2 lm nx pae sse sse2 sse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 sse4a ssse3 svm 
  bogomips: 36727 
  Speed: 1397 MHz min/max: 1400/2300 MHz boost: enabled Core speeds (MHz): 
  1: 1353 2: 1300 3: 1271 4: 1236 5: 1396 6: 1208 7: 2026 8: 3207 
Graphics:
  Device-1: AMD Picasso vendor: Huawei driver: amdgpu v: kernel 
  bus ID: 03:00.0 chip ID: 1002:15d8 
  Display: x11 server: X.Org 1.20.13 driver: amdgpu,ati 
  unloaded: fbdev,modesetting,vesa resolution: 2160x1440~60Hz 
  OpenGL: renderer: AMD Radeon Vega 10 Graphics (raven LLVM 13.0.0 DRM 3.41 
  5.13.0-35-generic) 
  v: 4.6 Mesa 22.0.0 - kisak-mesa PPA direct render: Yes 
Audio:
  Device-1: AMD Raven/Raven2/Fenghuang HDMI/DP Audio vendor: Huawei 
  driver: snd_hda_intel v: kernel bus ID: 03:00.1 chip ID: 1002:15de 
  Device-2: AMD Raven/Raven2/FireFlight/Renoir Audio Processor 
  vendor: Huawei driver: snd_pci_acp3x v: kernel bus ID: 03:00.5 
  chip ID: 1022:15e2 
  Device-3: AMD Family 17h HD Audio vendor: Huawei driver: snd_hda_intel 
  v: kernel bus ID: 03:00.6 chip ID: 1022:15e3 
  Sound Server: ALSA v: k5.13.0-35-generic 
Network:
  Device-1: Realtek RTL8822CE 802.11ac PCIe Wireless Network Adapter 
  vendor: & Tele RSH driver: rtw_8822ce v: N/A port: 2000 bus ID: 01:00.0 
  chip ID: 10ec:c822 
  IF: wlp1s0 state: up mac: <filter> 
  IF-ID-1: br-86ec5858d2a0 state: down mac: <filter> 
  IF-ID-2: br-9c053cf7139d state: up speed: 10000 Mbps duplex: unknown 
  mac: <filter> 
  IF-ID-3: docker0 state: down mac: <filter> 
  IF-ID-4: veth15ea5d2 state: up speed: 10000 Mbps duplex: full 
  mac: <filter> 
  IF-ID-5: veth26c452a state: up speed: 10000 Mbps duplex: full 
  mac: <filter> 
  IF-ID-6: veth6a34852 state: up speed: 10000 Mbps duplex: full 
  mac: <filter> 
  IF-ID-7: vethbad3c44 state: up speed: 10000 Mbps duplex: full 
  mac: <filter> 
  IF-ID-8: vethf6a9e8f state: up speed: 10000 Mbps duplex: full 
  mac: <filter> 
Drives:
  Local Storage: total: 476.94 GiB used: 331.46 GiB (69.5%) 
  ID-1: /dev/nvme0n1 vendor: Western Digital 
  model: PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1027 size: 476.94 GiB speed: 31.6 Gb/s 
  lanes: 4 serial: <filter> rev: 21117000 scheme: GPT 
Partition:
  ID-1: / size: 467.96 GiB used: 165.72 GiB (35.4%) fs: ext4 
  dev: /dev/nvme0n1p2 
Sensors:
  System Temperatures: cpu: 55.0 C mobo: N/A gpu: amdgpu temp: 55 C 
  Fan Speeds (RPM): N/A 
Repos:
  No active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list 
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/additional-repositories.list 
  1: deb https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/ubuntu/ focal main
  No active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/amdgpu-proprietary.list 
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/amdgpu.list 
  1: deb https://repo.radeon.com/amdgpu/21.40/ubuntu focal main
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/apt-fast-stable-focal.list 
  1: deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/apt-fast/stable/ubuntu focal main
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/docker.list 
  1: deb [arch=amd64 signed-by=/usr/share/keyrings/docker-archive-keyring.gpg] https://download.docker.com/linux/ubuntu focal stable
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/google-chrome.list 
  1: deb [arch=amd64] https://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/ stable main
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/graphics-drivers-ppa-focal.list 
  1: deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/graphics-drivers/ppa/ubuntu focal main
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/kisak-kisak-mesa-focal.list 
  1: deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/kisak/kisak-mesa/ubuntu focal main
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/lutris-team-lutris-focal.list 
  1: deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/lutris-team/lutris/ubuntu focal main
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/official-package-repositories.list 
  1: deb http://packages.linuxmint.com una main upstream import backport #id:linuxmint_main
  2: deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal main restricted universe multiverse
  3: deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-updates main restricted universe multiverse
  4: deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-backports main restricted universe multiverse
  5: deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ focal-security main restricted universe multiverse
  6: deb http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu/ focal partner
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/rocm.list 
  1: deb [arch=amd64] https://repo.radeon.com/rocm/apt/4.5 ubuntu main
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/spotify.list 
  1: deb http://repository.spotify.com stable non-free
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/steam.list 
  1: deb [arch=amd64,i386] https://repo.steampowered.com/steam/ stable steam
  2: deb-src [arch=amd64,i386] https://repo.steampowered.com/steam/ stable steam
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/teams.list 
  1: deb [arch=amd64] https://packages.microsoft.com/repos/ms-teams stable main
Info:
  Processes: 474 Uptime: 4h 31m Memory: 14.58 GiB used: 8.45 GiB (58.0%) 
  Init: systemd v: 245 runlevel: 5 Compilers: gcc: 9.4.0 alt: 9 Shell: bash 
  v: 5.0.17 running in: gnome-terminal inxi: 3.0.38

Post by **SMG** » Fri Mar 18, 2022 9:16 am

nandordena wrote: ⤴Fri Mar 18, 2022 7:32 am Full system info:

Your drivers are showing as loaded in this output and you should not have received a message.

Graphics:
Device-1: AMD Picasso vendor: Huawei driver: amdgpu v: kernel
bus ID: 03:00.0 chip ID: 1002:15d8
Display: x11 server: X.Org 1.20.13 driver: amdgpu,ati
unloaded: fbdev,modesetting,vesa resolution: 2160x1440~60Hz
OpenGL: renderer: AMD Radeon Vega 10 Graphics (raven LLVM 13.0.0 DRM 3.41
5.13.0-35-generic)
v: 4.6 Mesa 22.0.0 - kisak-mesa PPA direct render: Yes

Are you sometimes getting the message and sometimes not getting the message?

It appears you added a separate amdgpu package as well as some other packages. Perhaps there is interference happening on some boot cycles because of these?

Code: Select all

Repos:
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/amdgpu.list 
  1: deb https://repo.radeon.com/amdgpu/21.40/ubuntu focal main
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/graphics-drivers-ppa-focal.list 
  1: deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/graphics-drivers/ppa/ubuntu focal main
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/rocm.list 
  1: deb [arch=amd64] https://repo.radeon.com/rocm/apt/4.5 ubuntu main

nandordena · Post by **nandordena** » Fri Mar 18, 2022 1:47 pm

No, I do not receive the message.
I think there is a misunderstanding, sorry.

I came to the original post looking for a solution to the poor graphics performance.
I found this post where you recommended a kernel update, and my problem persisted, but I didn't realize the issue was about an error message.

In conclusion, I don't get any error message. I just have bad graphics performance.

Post by **SMG** » Fri Mar 18, 2022 2:12 pm

nandordena wrote: ⤴Fri Mar 18, 2022 1:47 pmIn conclusion, I don't get any error message. I just have bad graphics performance.

The original inxi information you posted indicates your system was running without hardware acceleration. When running Cinnamon without hardware acceleration, that should give you a message telling you to check your drivers. Also, performance will not be as good when running without hardware acceleration.

Graphics:
Device-1: AMD Picasso vendor: Huawei driver: amdgpu v: kernel
bus ID: 03:00.0
Display: x11 server: X.Org 1.20.13 driver: amdgpu,ati
unloaded: fbdev,modesetting,vesa resolution: 2160x1440~60Hz
OpenGL: renderer: llvmpipe (LLVM 13.0.0 256 bits)
v: 4.5 Mesa 22.0.0 - kisak-mesa PPA direct render: Yes

The second inxi info you posted indicated there was hardware acceleration. You should have better performance when that is the output.

nandordena wrote: ⤴Fri Mar 18, 2022 1:47 pmI came to the original post looking for a solution to the poor graphics performance.

What criteria are you using to decide you have poor graphics performance? We will need to know examples to be able to help you.

nandordena · Post by **nandordena** » Fri Mar 18, 2022 3:21 pm

I have run glmark2 to have a specific result and , although I don't have another benchmark to compare, it runs it without major problem.
But I notice the low performance when I try to run something with a minimum of graphic processing, ( zoom, gather.town, gimp... ).

GLmark2:

Code: Select all

=======================================================
    glmark2 2021.02
=======================================================
    OpenGL Information
    GL_VENDOR:     AMD
    GL_RENDERER:   AMD Radeon Vega 10 Graphics (raven, LLVM 13.0.0, DRM 3.41, 5.13.0-35-generic)
    GL_VERSION:    4.6 (Compatibility Profile) Mesa 22.0.0 - kisak-mesa PPA
=======================================================
[build] use-vbo=false: FPS: 1789 FrameTime: 0.559 ms
[build] use-vbo=true: FPS: 4786 FrameTime: 0.209 ms
[texture] texture-filter=nearest: FPS: 5581 FrameTime: 0.179 ms
[texture] texture-filter=linear: FPS: 5470 FrameTime: 0.183 ms
[texture] texture-filter=mipmap: FPS: 5370 FrameTime: 0.186 ms
[shading] shading=gouraud: FPS: 5391 FrameTime: 0.185 ms
[shading] shading=blinn-phong-inf: FPS: 5290 FrameTime: 0.189 ms
[shading] shading=phong: FPS: 5267 FrameTime: 0.190 ms
[shading] shading=cel: FPS: 5087 FrameTime: 0.197 ms
[bump] bump-render=high-poly: FPS: 3501 FrameTime: 0.286 ms
[bump] bump-render=normals: FPS: 5588 FrameTime: 0.179 ms
[bump] bump-render=height: FPS: 5330 FrameTime: 0.188 ms
[effect2d] kernel=0,1,0;1,-4,1;0,1,0;: FPS: 3833 FrameTime: 0.261 ms
[effect2d] kernel=1,1,1,1,1;1,1,1,1,1;1,1,1,1,1;: FPS: 2445 FrameTime: 0.409 ms
[pulsar] light=false:quads=5:texture=false: FPS: 4126 FrameTime: 0.242 ms
[desktop] blur-radius=5:effect=blur:passes=1:separable=true:windows=4: FPS: 1936 FrameTime: 0.517 ms
[desktop] effect=shadow:windows=4: FPS: 2995 FrameTime: 0.334 ms
[buffer] columns=200:interleave=false:update-dispersion=0.9:update-fraction=0.5:update-method=map: FPS: 792 FrameTime: 1.263 ms
[buffer] columns=200:interleave=false:update-dispersion=0.9:update-fraction=0.5:update-method=subdata: FPS: 972 FrameTime: 1.029 ms
[buffer] columns=200:interleave=true:update-dispersion=0.9:update-fraction=0.5:update-method=map: FPS: 886 FrameTime: 1.129 ms
[ideas] speed=duration: FPS: 1893 FrameTime: 0.528 ms
[jellyfish] <default>: FPS: 2530 FrameTime: 0.395 ms
[terrain] <default>: FPS: 361 FrameTime: 2.770 ms
[shadow] <default>: FPS: 3845 FrameTime: 0.260 ms
[refract] <default>: FPS: 311 FrameTime: 3.215 ms
[conditionals] fragment-steps=0:vertex-steps=0: FPS: 4270 FrameTime: 0.234 ms
[conditionals] fragment-steps=5:vertex-steps=0: FPS: 4224 FrameTime: 0.237 ms
[conditionals] fragment-steps=0:vertex-steps=5: FPS: 4069 FrameTime: 0.246 ms
[function] fragment-complexity=low:fragment-steps=5: FPS: 4023 FrameTime: 0.249 ms
[function] fragment-complexity=medium:fragment-steps=5: FPS: 4248 FrameTime: 0.235 ms
[loop] fragment-loop=false:fragment-steps=5:vertex-steps=5: FPS: 3807 FrameTime: 0.263 ms
[loop] fragment-steps=5:fragment-uniform=false:vertex-steps=5: FPS: 4036 FrameTime: 0.248 ms
[loop] fragment-steps=5:fragment-uniform=true:vertex-steps=5: FPS: 4156 FrameTime: 0.241 ms
=======================================================
                                  glmark2 Score: 3582 
=======================================================

Post by **SMG** » Fri Mar 18, 2022 7:06 pm

nandordena wrote: ⤴Fri Mar 18, 2022 3:21 pm I have run glmark2 to have a specific result and , although I don't have another benchmark to compare, it runs it without major problem.

glmark2 is run to make comparisons to changes you have made on your specific computer. You would use the values you have now to compare to see if changes you make have a positive or negative impact.

nandordena wrote: ⤴Fri Mar 18, 2022 3:21 pmBut I notice the low performance when I try to run something with a minimum of graphic processing, ( zoom, gather.town, gimp... ).

What criteria are you using to say the performance is low?

Based on what I've seen posted on this forum, everyone complains about performance with Zoom. Quite a bit of that has to do with the way the Zoom app is designed and how it works with the Zoom network servers. There is a Zoom forum where you may find tips on how to optimize performance.

I do know what gather.town is, but if it is also a web-browser based app then perhaps you would want to optimize the settings for performance and hardware acceleration either in the app or in the browser settings.

nandordena · Post by **nandordena** » Sat Mar 19, 2022 8:02 am

What criteria are you using to say the performance is low?

Low fps, high resource use, slow and blocked operation in general.

It appears you added a separate amdgpu package as well as some other packages. Perhaps there is interference happening on some boot cycles because of these?

Maybe there are interferences in some start cycles and because of these you have poor performance?
How can I clean it?

today I got a much worse result on glmark

Today's results: Score: 626

Code: Select all

$ glmark2 --fullscreen
=======================================================
    glmark2 2021.02
=======================================================
    OpenGL Information
    GL_VENDOR:     AMD
    GL_RENDERER:   AMD Radeon Vega 10 Graphics (raven, LLVM 13.0.0, DRM 3.41, 5.13.0-35-generic)
    GL_VERSION:    4.6 (Compatibility Profile) Mesa 22.0.0 - kisak-mesa PPA
=======================================================
[build] use-vbo=false: FPS: 407 FrameTime: 2.457 ms
[build] use-vbo=true: FPS: 923 FrameTime: 1.083 ms
[texture] texture-filter=nearest: FPS: 1051 FrameTime: 0.951 ms
[texture] texture-filter=linear: FPS: 960 FrameTime: 1.042 ms
[texture] texture-filter=mipmap: FPS: 999 FrameTime: 1.001 ms
[shading] shading=gouraud: FPS: 1058 FrameTime: 0.945 ms
[shading] shading=blinn-phong-inf: FPS: 1003 FrameTime: 0.997 ms
[shading] shading=phong: FPS: 1054 FrameTime: 0.949 ms
[shading] shading=cel: FPS: 998 FrameTime: 1.002 ms
[bump] bump-render=high-poly: FPS: 1017 FrameTime: 0.983 ms
[bump] bump-render=normals: FPS: 1115 FrameTime: 0.897 ms
[bump] bump-render=height: FPS: 1080 FrameTime: 0.926 ms
[effect2d] kernel=0,1,0;1,-4,1;0,1,0;: FPS: 604 FrameTime: 1.656 ms
[effect2d] kernel=1,1,1,1,1;1,1,1,1,1;1,1,1,1,1;: FPS: 314 FrameTime: 3.185 ms
[pulsar] light=false:quads=5:texture=false: FPS: 609 FrameTime: 1.642 ms
[desktop] blur-radius=5:effect=blur:passes=1:separable=true:windows=4: FPS: 274 FrameTime: 3.650 ms
[desktop] effect=shadow:windows=4: FPS: 402 FrameTime: 2.488 ms
[buffer] columns=200:interleave=false:update-dispersion=0.9:update-fraction=0.5:update-method=map: FPS: 247 FrameTime: 4.049 ms
[buffer] columns=200:interleave=false:update-dispersion=0.9:update-fraction=0.5:update-method=subdata: FPS: 267 FrameTime: 3.745 ms
[buffer] columns=200:interleave=true:update-dispersion=0.9:update-fraction=0.5:update-method=map: FPS: 248 FrameTime: 4.032 ms
[ideas] speed=duration: FPS: 391 FrameTime: 2.558 ms
[jellyfish] <default>: FPS: 349 FrameTime: 2.865 ms
[terrain] <default>: FPS: 50 FrameTime: 20.000 ms
[shadow] <default>: FPS: 546 FrameTime: 1.832 ms
[refract] <default>: FPS: 68 FrameTime: 14.706 ms
[conditionals] fragment-steps=0:vertex-steps=0: FPS: 580 FrameTime: 1.724 ms
[conditionals] fragment-steps=5:vertex-steps=0: FPS: 586 FrameTime: 1.706 ms
[conditionals] fragment-steps=0:vertex-steps=5: FPS: 584 FrameTime: 1.712 ms
[function] fragment-complexity=low:fragment-steps=5: FPS: 584 FrameTime: 1.712 ms
[function] fragment-complexity=medium:fragment-steps=5: FPS: 565 FrameTime: 1.770 ms
[loop] fragment-loop=false:fragment-steps=5:vertex-steps=5: FPS: 581 FrameTime: 1.721 ms
[loop] fragment-steps=5:fragment-uniform=false:vertex-steps=5: FPS: 578 FrameTime: 1.730 ms
[loop] fragment-steps=5:fragment-uniform=true:vertex-steps=5: FPS: 589 FrameTime: 1.698 ms
=======================================================
                                  glmark2 Score: 626 
=======================================================

I restarted it, and the graph disappeared.

Code: Select all

$ glmark2 --fullscreen
** GLX does not support GLX_EXT_swap_control or GLX_MESA_swap_control!
** Failed to set swap interval. Results may be bounded above by refresh rate.
=======================================================
    glmark2 2021.02
=======================================================
    OpenGL Information
    GL_VENDOR:     Mesa/X.org
    GL_RENDERER:   llvmpipe (LLVM 13.0.0, 256 bits)
    GL_VERSION:    4.5 (Compatibility Profile) Mesa 22.0.0 - kisak-mesa PPA
=======================================================
** GLX does not support GLX_EXT_swap_control or GLX_MESA_swap_control!
** Failed to set swap interval. Results may be bounded above by refresh rate.
[build] use-vbo=false: FPS: 90 FrameTime: 11.111 ms
** GLX does not support GLX_EXT_swap_control or GLX_MESA_swap_control!
** Failed to set swap interval. Results may be bounded above by refresh rate.
[build] use-vbo=true: FPS: 93 FrameTime: 10.753 ms
** GLX does not support GLX_EXT_swap_control or GLX_MESA_swap_control!
** Failed to set swap interval. Results may be bounded above by refresh rate.
[texture] texture-filter=nearest: FPS: 96 FrameTime: 10.417 ms
** GLX does not support GLX_EXT_swap_control or GLX_MESA_swap_control!
** Failed to set swap interval. Results may be bounded above by refresh rate.
[texture] texture-filter=linear: FPS: 89 FrameTime: 11.236 ms
** GLX does not support GLX_EXT_swap_control or GLX_MESA_swap_control!
** Failed to set swap interval. Results may be bounded above by refresh rate.
[texture] texture-filter=mipmap: FPS: 83 FrameTime: 12.048 ms
** GLX does not support GLX_EXT_swap_control or GLX_MESA_swap_control!
** Failed to set swap interval. Results may be bounded above by refresh rate.
[shading] shading=gouraud: FPS: 83 FrameTime: 12.048 ms
** GLX does not support GLX_EXT_swap_control or GLX_MESA_swap_control!
** Failed to set swap interval. Results may be bounded above by refresh rate.
[shading] shading=blinn-phong-inf: FPS: 78 FrameTime: 12.821 ms
** GLX does not support GLX_EXT_swap_control or GLX_MESA_swap_control!
** Failed to set swap interval. Results may be bounded above by refresh rate.
[shading] shading=phong: FPS: 72 FrameTime: 13.889 ms
** GLX does not support GLX_EXT_swap_control or GLX_MESA_swap_control!
** Failed to set swap interval. Results may be bounded above by refresh rate.
[shading] shading=cel: FPS: 73 FrameTime: 13.699 ms
** GLX does not support GLX_EXT_swap_control or GLX_MESA_swap_control!
** Failed to set swap interval. Results may be bounded above by refresh rate.
[bump] bump-render=high-poly: FPS: 59 FrameTime: 16.949 ms
** GLX does not support GLX_EXT_swap_control or GLX_MESA_swap_control!
** Failed to set swap interval. Results may be bounded above by refresh rate.
[bump] bump-render=normals: FPS: 95 FrameTime: 10.526 ms
** GLX does not support GLX_EXT_swap_control or GLX_MESA_swap_control!
** Failed to set swap interval. Results may be bounded above by refresh rate.
[bump] bump-render=height: FPS: 91 FrameTime: 10.989 ms
** GLX does not support GLX_EXT_swap_control or GLX_MESA_swap_control!
** Failed to set swap interval. Results may be bounded above by refresh rate.
[effect2d] kernel=0,1,0;1,-4,1;0,1,0;: FPS: 58 FrameTime: 17.241 ms
** GLX does not support GLX_EXT_swap_control or GLX_MESA_swap_control!
** Failed to set swap interval. Results may be bounded above by refresh rate.
[effect2d] kernel=1,1,1,1,1;1,1,1,1,1;1,1,1,1,1;: FPS: 35 FrameTime: 28.571 ms
** GLX does not support GLX_EXT_swap_control or GLX_MESA_swap_control!
** Failed to set swap interval. Results may be bounded above by refresh rate.
[pulsar] light=false:quads=5:texture=false: FPS: 79 FrameTime: 12.658 ms
** GLX does not support GLX_EXT_swap_control or GLX_MESA_swap_control!
** Failed to set swap interval. Results may be bounded above by refresh rate.
[desktop] blur-radius=5:effect=blur:passes=1:separable=true:windows=4: FPS: 12 FrameTime: 83.333 ms
** GLX does not support GLX_EXT_swap_control or GLX_MESA_swap_control!
** Failed to set swap interval. Results may be bounded above by refresh rate.
[desktop] effect=shadow:windows=4: FPS: 31 FrameTime: 32.258 ms
** GLX does not support GLX_EXT_swap_control or GLX_MESA_swap_control!
** Failed to set swap interval. Results may be bounded above by refresh rate.
[buffer] columns=200:interleave=false:update-dispersion=0.9:update-fraction=0.5:update-method=map: FPS: 60 FrameTime: 16.667 ms
** GLX does not support GLX_EXT_swap_control or GLX_MESA_swap_control!
** Failed to set swap interval. Results may be bounded above by refresh rate.
[buffer] columns=200:interleave=false:update-dispersion=0.9:update-fraction=0.5:update-method=subdata: FPS: 60 FrameTime: 16.667 ms
** GLX does not support GLX_EXT_swap_control or GLX_MESA_swap_control!
** Failed to set swap interval. Results may be bounded above by refresh rate.
[buffer] columns=200:interleave=true:update-dispersion=0.9:update-fraction=0.5:update-method=map: FPS: 60 FrameTime: 16.667 ms
** GLX does not support GLX_EXT_swap_control or GLX_MESA_swap_control!
** Failed to set swap interval. Results may be bounded above by refresh rate.
[ideas] speed=duration: FPS: 72 FrameTime: 13.889 ms
** GLX does not support GLX_EXT_swap_control or GLX_MESA_swap_control!
** Failed to set swap interval. Results may be bounded above by refresh rate.
[jellyfish] <default>: FPS: 33 FrameTime: 30.303 ms
** GLX does not support GLX_EXT_swap_control or GLX_MESA_swap_control!
** Failed to set swap interval. Results may be bounded above by refresh rate.
[terrain] <default>: FPS: 2 FrameTime: 500.000 ms
** GLX does not support GLX_EXT_swap_control or GLX_MESA_swap_control!
** Failed to set swap interval. Results may be bounded above by refresh rate.
[shadow] <default>: FPS: 40 FrameTime: 25.000 ms
** GLX does not support GLX_EXT_swap_control or GLX_MESA_swap_control!
** Failed to set swap interval. Results may be bounded above by refresh rate.
[refract] <default>: FPS: 11 FrameTime: 90.909 ms
** GLX does not support GLX_EXT_swap_control or GLX_MESA_swap_control!
** Failed to set swap interval. Results may be bounded above by refresh rate.
[conditionals] fragment-steps=0:vertex-steps=0: FPS: 88 FrameTime: 11.364 ms
** GLX does not support GLX_EXT_swap_control or GLX_MESA_swap_control!
** Failed to set swap interval. Results may be bounded above by refresh rate.
[conditionals] fragment-steps=5:vertex-steps=0: FPS: 85 FrameTime: 11.765 ms
** GLX does not support GLX_EXT_swap_control or GLX_MESA_swap_control!
** Failed to set swap interval. Results may be bounded above by refresh rate.
[conditionals] fragment-steps=0:vertex-steps=5: FPS: 89 FrameTime: 11.236 ms
** GLX does not support GLX_EXT_swap_control or GLX_MESA_swap_control!
** Failed to set swap interval. Results may be bounded above by refresh rate.
[function] fragment-complexity=low:fragment-steps=5: FPS: 86 FrameTime: 11.628 ms
** GLX does not support GLX_EXT_swap_control or GLX_MESA_swap_control!
** Failed to set swap interval. Results may be bounded above by refresh rate.
[function] fragment-complexity=medium:fragment-steps=5: FPS: 80 FrameTime: 12.500 ms
** GLX does not support GLX_EXT_swap_control or GLX_MESA_swap_control!
** Failed to set swap interval. Results may be bounded above by refresh rate.
[loop] fragment-loop=false:fragment-steps=5:vertex-steps=5: FPS: 86 FrameTime: 11.628 ms
** GLX does not support GLX_EXT_swap_control or GLX_MESA_swap_control!
** Failed to set swap interval. Results may be bounded above by refresh rate.
[loop] fragment-steps=5:fragment-uniform=false:vertex-steps=5: FPS: 86 FrameTime: 11.628 ms
** GLX does not support GLX_EXT_swap_control or GLX_MESA_swap_control!
** Failed to set swap interval. Results may be bounded above by refresh rate.
[loop] fragment-steps=5:fragment-uniform=true:vertex-steps=5: FPS: 83 FrameTime: 12.048 ms
=======================================================
                                  glmark2 Score: 67 
=======================================================

Post by **SMG** » Sat Mar 19, 2022 9:09 am

nandordena wrote: ⤴Sat Mar 19, 2022 8:02 am
What criteria are you using to say the performance is low?
Low fps, high resource use, slow and blocked operation in general.

If your system is using software rendering instead of hardware rendering, then that result is likely.

nandordena wrote: ⤴Sat Mar 19, 2022 8:02 am
It appears you added a separate amdgpu package as well as some other packages. Perhaps there is interference happening on some boot cycles because of these?
Maybe there are interferences in some start cycles and because of these you have poor performance?
How can I clean it?

If you took a Timeshift snapshot before you installed these packages, revert to the snapshot. If you did not, you will have to check the documentation for the packages to find the instructions for uninstalling it.

nandordena wrote: ⤴Sat Mar 19, 2022 8:02 amI restarted it, and the graph disappeared.

What is "it" that you restarted? The outputs this time clearly indicate you are running in software rendering mode.

Code: Select all

    GL_RENDERER:   llvmpipe (LLVM 13.0.0, 256 bits)

nandordena · Post by **nandordena** » Mon Mar 21, 2022 3:09 pm

What is "it" that you restarted? The outputs this time clearly indicate you are running in software rendering mode.

he should use hardware rendering, normally.
But when I restart the pc, I have seen that sometimes, it shows me that it is using software rendering.
that's why my question of:

Maybe there are interferences in some start cycles and because of these you have poor performance?
How can I clean it?

What else could be causing it not to use hardware rendering?

Today Runs better, but it is still not normal operation:
(994)

Code: Select all

glmark2 --fullscreen
=======================================================
    glmark2 2021.02
=======================================================
    OpenGL Information
    GL_VENDOR:     AMD
    GL_RENDERER:   AMD Radeon Vega 10 Graphics (raven, LLVM 13.0.0, DRM 3.41, 5.13.0-35-generic)
    GL_VERSION:    4.6 (Compatibility Profile) Mesa 22.0.0 - kisak-mesa PPA
=======================================================
[build] use-vbo=false: FPS: 458 FrameTime: 2.183 ms
[build] use-vbo=true: FPS: 1318 FrameTime: 0.759 ms
[texture] texture-filter=nearest: FPS: 1424 FrameTime: 0.702 ms
[texture] texture-filter=linear: FPS: 1436 FrameTime: 0.696 ms
[texture] texture-filter=mipmap: FPS: 1418 FrameTime: 0.705 ms
[shading] shading=gouraud: FPS: 1392 FrameTime: 0.718 ms
[shading] shading=blinn-phong-inf: FPS: 1363 FrameTime: 0.734 ms
[shading] shading=phong: FPS: 1364 FrameTime: 0.733 ms
[shading] shading=cel: FPS: 1321 FrameTime: 0.757 ms
[bump] bump-render=high-poly: FPS: 1335 FrameTime: 0.749 ms
[bump] bump-render=normals: FPS: 1701 FrameTime: 0.588 ms
[bump] bump-render=height: FPS: 1678 FrameTime: 0.596 ms
[effect2d] kernel=0,1,0;1,-4,1;0,1,0;: FPS: 804 FrameTime: 1.244 ms
[effect2d] kernel=1,1,1,1,1;1,1,1,1,1;1,1,1,1,1;: FPS: 379 FrameTime: 2.639 ms
[pulsar] light=false:quads=5:texture=false: FPS: 871 FrameTime: 1.148 ms
[desktop] blur-radius=5:effect=blur:passes=1:separable=true:windows=4: FPS: 334 FrameTime: 2.994 ms
[desktop] effect=shadow:windows=4: FPS: 678 FrameTime: 1.475 ms
[buffer] columns=200:interleave=false:update-dispersion=0.9:update-fraction=0.5:update-method=map: FPS: 317 FrameTime: 3.155 ms
[buffer] columns=200:interleave=false:update-dispersion=0.9:update-fraction=0.5:update-method=subdata: FPS: 488 FrameTime: 2.049 ms
[buffer] columns=200:interleave=true:update-dispersion=0.9:update-fraction=0.5:update-method=map: FPS: 322 FrameTime: 3.106 ms
[ideas] speed=duration: FPS: 529 FrameTime: 1.890 ms
[jellyfish] <default>: FPS: 744 FrameTime: 1.344 ms
[terrain] <default>: FPS: 103 FrameTime: 9.709 ms
[shadow] <default>: FPS: 1118 FrameTime: 0.894 ms
[refract] <default>: FPS: 88 FrameTime: 11.364 ms
[conditionals] fragment-steps=0:vertex-steps=0: FPS: 1242 FrameTime: 0.805 ms
[conditionals] fragment-steps=5:vertex-steps=0: FPS: 1227 FrameTime: 0.815 ms
[conditionals] fragment-steps=0:vertex-steps=5: FPS: 1245 FrameTime: 0.803 ms
[function] fragment-complexity=low:fragment-steps=5: FPS: 1226 FrameTime: 0.816 ms
[function] fragment-complexity=medium:fragment-steps=5: FPS: 1225 FrameTime: 0.816 ms
[loop] fragment-loop=false:fragment-steps=5:vertex-steps=5: FPS: 1222 FrameTime: 0.818 ms
[loop] fragment-steps=5:fragment-uniform=false:vertex-steps=5: FPS: 1228 FrameTime: 0.814 ms
[loop] fragment-steps=5:fragment-uniform=true:vertex-steps=5: FPS: 1225 FrameTime: 0.816 ms
=======================================================
                                  glmark2 Score: 994 
=======================================================

Post by **SMG** » Mon Mar 21, 2022 3:20 pm

nandordena wrote: ⤴Mon Mar 21, 2022 3:09 pmWhat else could be causing it not to use hardware rendering?

I already gave you a possibility earlier in this topic.

SMG wrote: ⤴Fri Mar 18, 2022 9:16 amIt appears you added a separate amdgpu package as well as some other packages. Perhaps there is interference happening on some boot cycles because of these?
Code: Select all
Repos:
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/amdgpu.list 
  1: deb https://repo.radeon.com/amdgpu/21.40/ubuntu focal main
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/graphics-drivers-ppa-focal.list 
  1: deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/graphics-drivers/ppa/ubuntu focal main
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/rocm.list 
  1: deb [arch=amd64] https://repo.radeon.com/rocm/apt/4.5 ubuntu main

You have at least three different packages installed--the original Linux Mint files, the AMD website files (amdgpu and rocm), and the graphics-driver-ppa files. All are showing as active.

Do you still have all of those installed? Or have you removed some of them?

nandordena · Post by **nandordena** » Mon Mar 21, 2022 5:39 pm

I have not uninstalled any of them yet,
I'm

If you did not, you will have to check the documentation for the packages to find the instructions for uninstalling it.

looking for the instructions to uninstall the packages,
Also deciding which one to leave, I understand it is :

Code: Select all

 1: deb [arch=amd64] https://repo.radeon.com/rocm/apt/4.5 ubuntu main

but maybe it can be:

Code: Select all

1: deb https://repo.radeon.com/amdgpu/21.40/ubuntu focal main

I don't know which of the 2 is the one that is loading when I really have the good performance like today:

I got a really good result today

Code: Select all

=======================================================
    glmark2 2021.02
=======================================================
    OpenGL Information
    GL_VENDOR:     AMD
    GL_RENDERER:   AMD Radeon Vega 10 Graphics (raven, LLVM 13.0.0, DRM 3.41, 5.13.0-37-generic)
    GL_VERSION:    4.6 (Compatibility Profile) Mesa 22.0.0 - kisak-mesa PPA
=======================================================
[build] use-vbo=false: FPS: 1696 FrameTime: 0.590 ms
[build] use-vbo=true: FPS: 1780 FrameTime: 0.562 ms
[texture] texture-filter=nearest: FPS: 1476 FrameTime: 0.678 ms
[texture] texture-filter=linear: FPS: 1488 FrameTime: 0.672 ms
[texture] texture-filter=mipmap: FPS: 1472 FrameTime: 0.679 ms
[shading] shading=gouraud: FPS: 1443 FrameTime: 0.693 ms
[shading] shading=blinn-phong-inf: FPS: 1409 FrameTime: 0.710 ms
[shading] shading=phong: FPS: 1414 FrameTime: 0.707 ms
[shading] shading=cel: FPS: 1367 FrameTime: 0.732 ms
[bump] bump-render=high-poly: FPS: 1405 FrameTime: 0.712 ms
[bump] bump-render=normals: FPS: 1757 FrameTime: 0.569 ms
[bump] bump-render=height: FPS: 1734 FrameTime: 0.577 ms
[effect2d] kernel=0,1,0;1,-4,1;0,1,0;: FPS: 907 FrameTime: 1.103 ms
[effect2d] kernel=1,1,1,1,1;1,1,1,1,1;1,1,1,1,1;: FPS: 454 FrameTime: 2.203 ms
[pulsar] light=false:quads=5:texture=false: FPS: 1165 FrameTime: 0.858 ms
[desktop] blur-radius=5:effect=blur:passes=1:separable=true:windows=4: FPS: 467 FrameTime: 2.141 ms
[desktop] effect=shadow:windows=4: FPS: 760 FrameTime: 1.316 ms
[buffer] columns=200:interleave=false:update-dispersion=0.9:update-fraction=0.5:update-method=map: FPS: 717 FrameTime: 1.395 ms
[buffer] columns=200:interleave=false:update-dispersion=0.9:update-fraction=0.5:update-method=subdata: FPS: 989 FrameTime: 1.011 ms
[buffer] columns=200:interleave=true:update-dispersion=0.9:update-fraction=0.5:update-method=map: FPS: 794 FrameTime: 1.259 ms
[ideas] speed=duration: FPS: 1157 FrameTime: 0.864 ms
[jellyfish] <default>: FPS: 782 FrameTime: 1.279 ms
[terrain] <default>: FPS: 108 FrameTime: 9.259 ms
[shadow] <default>: FPS: 1149 FrameTime: 0.870 ms
[refract] <default>: FPS: 183 FrameTime: 5.464 ms
[conditionals] fragment-steps=0:vertex-steps=0: FPS: 1287 FrameTime: 0.777 ms
[conditionals] fragment-steps=5:vertex-steps=0: FPS: 1261 FrameTime: 0.793 ms
[conditionals] fragment-steps=0:vertex-steps=5: FPS: 1287 FrameTime: 0.777 ms
[function] fragment-complexity=low:fragment-steps=5: FPS: 1262 FrameTime: 0.792 ms
[function] fragment-complexity=medium:fragment-steps=5: FPS: 1262 FrameTime: 0.792 ms
[loop] fragment-loop=false:fragment-steps=5:vertex-steps=5: FPS: 1263 FrameTime: 0.792 ms
[loop] fragment-steps=5:fragment-uniform=false:vertex-steps=5: FPS: 1264 FrameTime: 0.791 ms
[loop] fragment-steps=5:fragment-uniform=true:vertex-steps=5: FPS: 1264 FrameTime: 0.791 ms
=======================================================
                                  glmark2 Score: 1158 
=======================================================

I just store it because I noticed in my normal usi that the whole system was working with the correct performance, so I can have a reference of when it is working well.

Post by **SMG** » Mon Mar 21, 2022 5:55 pm

nandordena wrote: ⤴Mon Mar 21, 2022 5:39 pm I have not uninstalled any of them yet,
I'm
If you did not, you will have to check the documentation for the packages to find the instructions for uninstalling it.
looking for the instructions to uninstall the packages,
Also deciding which one to leave, I understand it is :
Code: Select all
 1: deb [arch=amd64] https://repo.radeon.com/rocm/apt/4.5 ubuntu main
but maybe it can be:
Code: Select all
1: deb https://repo.radeon.com/amdgpu/21.40/ubuntu focal main
I don't know which of the 2 is the one that is loading when I really have the good performance like today:

Both of those are from the AMD website driver package.

The output says you have the kisak-ppa installed which sounds like neither of the above is loaded. However, it is not always easy to know when multiple packages for the same software are loaded. It is possible parts of more than one are loading even though only one name is listed.

GL_RENDERER: AMD Radeon Vega 10 Graphics (raven, LLVM 13.0.0, DRM 3.41, 5.13.0-37-generic)
GL_VERSION: 4.6 (Compatibility Profile) Mesa 22.0.0 - kisak-mesa PPA

If you are worried about "losing" performance, by removing something then take a Timeshift snapshot before you remove it.

nandordena · Post by **nandordena** » Fri May 20, 2022 11:32 am

Finally, I get a constant driver load.
My actually config is, no one graphic driver from PPA:

And Just this one from AMD:

With this config, I get the best perform every load.

Code: Select all

$ glmark2 --fullscreen
=======================================================
    glmark2 2021.02
=======================================================
    OpenGL Information
    GL_VENDOR:     AMD
    GL_RENDERER:   AMD Radeon Vega 10 Graphics (raven, LLVM 14.0.1, DRM 3.41, 5.13.0-41-generic)
    GL_VERSION:    4.6 (Compatibility Profile) Mesa 22.0.3 - kisak-mesa PPA
=======================================================
                                  glmark2 Score: 1477 
=======================================================

Thank you very much SMG for letting me see that the problem was a conflict in the software source.

Post by **SMG** » Fri May 20, 2022 2:48 pm

nandordena wrote: ⤴Fri May 20, 2022 11:32 amThank you very much SMG for letting me see that the problem was a conflict in the software source.

You are welcome.

Please go to your first post in this topic, click the pencil icon, and add [SOLVED] to the beginning of the title so others know you are no longer seeking help on this issue.

Linux Mint Forums

[SOLVED] Getting message about lack of Drivers for AMD Picasso

[SOLVED] Getting message about lack of Drivers for AMD Picasso

Re: Getting message about lack of Drivers for AMD Picasso

Re: Getting message about lack of Drivers for AMD Picasso

Re: Getting message about lack of Drivers for AMD Picasso

Re: Getting message about lack of Drivers for AMD Picasso

Re: Getting message about lack of Drivers for AMD Picasso

Re: Getting message about lack of Drivers for AMD Picasso

Re: Getting message about lack of Drivers for AMD Picasso

Re: Getting message about lack of Drivers for AMD Picasso

Re: Getting message about lack of Drivers for AMD Picasso

Re: Getting message about lack of Drivers for AMD Picasso

Re: Getting message about lack of Drivers for AMD Picasso

Re: Getting message about lack of Drivers for AMD Picasso

Re: Getting message about lack of Drivers for AMD Picasso

Re: Getting message about lack of Drivers for AMD Picasso

Re: Getting message about lack of Drivers for AMD Picasso