Bad security! (firewall)

Questions about the project and the distribution - obviously no support questions here please
mh4
Level 1
Level 1
Posts: 8
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2006 9:59 pm

Bad security! (firewall)

Postby mh4 » Sun Nov 26, 2006 3:06 pm

Janne Karhunen OpenSuse developer wrote: http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse/2006 ... 03786.html

"I ran Kubuntu Edgy on few systems for a week. Was really
pleasantly surprised, altough few things really amazed me:
- It's a desktop system in year 2006 that does not ship with
any sort of netfilter (firewall) rules by default. This is huge.
We need to keep the image of Linux as a secure system!
Even if no services are actually enabled attack vector is
still considerably bigger. Packets make it all the way to the
protocol stack (versus prerouting hook)."

User avatar
scorp123
Level 8
Level 8
Posts: 2264
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 4:19 pm
Location: Switzerland

Re: Bad security! (firewall)

Postby scorp123 » Sun Dec 10, 2006 7:59 am

mh4 wrote:Janne Karhunen OpenSuse developer wrote: http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse/2006 ... 03786.html

"I ran Kubuntu Edgy on few systems for a week. Was really
pleasantly surprised, altough few things really amazed me:
- It's a desktop system in year 2006 that does not ship with
any sort of netfilter (firewall) rules by default. ....


What do you need a firewall for on a Linux desktop installation with no exploitable network services running??

jars_u
Level 1
Level 1
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2006 10:21 am

linux security

Postby jars_u » Wed Dec 13, 2006 8:09 pm

A firewall is certainly more of a Windows then a Linux necessity but I know I feel naked without firewall and anti-virus software installed because of conditioning caused by years of bad Windows security. Perhaps it's just psychological peace of mind but I think new Linux users would feel more secure with both pre-configured. I suggest Firestarter and ClamAV. See


Return to “Non-technical Questions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests