cinnamom vs mate - which one has a better future?

Chat about anything related to Linux Mint
Level 4
Level 4
Posts: 401
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 1:25 am

cinnamom vs mate - which one has a better future?

Postby shengchieh » Mon Oct 07, 2013 8:40 pm

I already downloaded LM XFCE, but I want to download one other LM (and a few lightweight distros) in case I need it - I don't know how powerful the school's old computer except that it is
probably more powerful than this dinosaur I am using now.

From searching, I learn that Mate is faster than Cinnamom. Of the two (LM Mate & LM Cinnamom), which one has a better future? Or should I use the LM KDE or LMDE version as alternative distro instead?

Your opinion please???


User avatar
Level 6
Level 6
Posts: 1369
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2012 7:29 pm

Re: cinnamom vs mate - which one has a better future?

Postby passerby » Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:43 pm

MATE is faster and much lighter.
Cinnamon is being more actively developed.

Cinnamon probably has the "better future"; MATE isn't actively adding new features and technologies like Cinnamon, its focus is on a stable working environment.
Since it's an older computer, though it sounds like you don't know the exact specs, I'd say to go with MATE.
The version depends on you; LMDE just had an update pack released, but for a long time it'd been very out of date. As for LM, if you don't want to reinstall every 6 months, I'd say go with 13, the LTS version.
Home PC: Xubuntu 14.04 x64, Nvidia GTX650, i7 3770K, 16GB RAM, Asus Xonar DX
Work PC: Mint 13 x64 XFCE, Nvidia GT620, i5 3470, 8GB RAM
Laptop: System76 Kudu Pro, Xubuntu 14.04 x64

My HTML5 login themes + screenshots

Return to “Chat about Linux Mint”