Gnome3

Chat about anything related to Linux Mint
User avatar
tdapple
Level 2
Level 2
Posts: 62
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 9:14 am
Location: Plano, TX
Contact:

Gnome 3

Post by tdapple » Tue Apr 28, 2009 11:32 pm

I was looking at Gnome 3 some today and i'm not sure if it goes well with me. I find GnomeZeitgeist interesting, but the whole Gnome Shell thing i'm not sure about. It makes me wonder if I would be better off heading the XFCE or KDE way.

I was just wondering what everyone thought, and if you read this Clem...have you ever considered moving away from Gnome as the base. Just curious.

User avatar
Paul_Vandenberg
Level 2
Level 2
Posts: 61
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 9:11 pm
Location: Canada

Re: Gnome 3

Post by Paul_Vandenberg » Wed Apr 29, 2009 9:28 am

I keep telling myself that should give GNOME Shell the benefit of the doubt. However, I have my concerns about it. One of them is the apparent lack of an organized menu structure. I don't like the idea of 'searching' for apps. What if I don't know what an app is called? Xfce might be the way to go.

Paul

User avatar
tdapple
Level 2
Level 2
Posts: 62
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 9:14 am
Location: Plano, TX
Contact:

Re: Gnome 3

Post by tdapple » Wed Apr 29, 2009 9:49 am

Paul_Vandenberg wrote:Xfce might be the way to go.

Paul
Thats what I am thinking....Xubuntu Jaunty is pretty nice. I wish Mint had a 64bit Xfce install....If it is just a matter of compiling the packages I would be willing to do that....though at this point I would need some training. When mint 7 comes out...I may install it and remove gnome....we'll see I guess.

emorrp1
Level 8
Level 8
Posts: 2158
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 8:58 pm

Re: Gnome 3

Post by emorrp1 » Wed Apr 29, 2009 10:30 am

Paul: I used to think that about gnome Do, now I enjoy launching each of my most used apps with 4 keystrokes :-)

Also, I've found XFCE to be great, it uses the same gui toolkit as gnome (GTK) so most apps will look identical, but it's snappier and you can actually remove the panel entirely if you want (possible, but difficult in gnome)
If you have a question that has been answered and solved, then please edit your original post and put a [SOLVED] at the end of your subject header
Hint - use a google search including the search term site:forums.linuxmint.com

altair4
Level 19
Level 19
Posts: 9750
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 10:27 am

Re: Gnome 3

Post by altair4 » Wed Apr 29, 2009 12:12 pm

I've been a non-stop KDE user since Suse 6. Mint is my first Gnome distro because of what was happening with KDE4. With Gnome3 it looks like I'm going to read the same discussions and the same arguments over why Gnome3 is such an improvement. To me Gnome and KDE seems to be in a race to see who can produce the most infantile DE. I agree that XFCE looks like a viable alternative unless they get caught up in this race to the bottom.

I do apologize, I guess I got a little carried away. I don't think I'm the right person to voice an opinion anyway. The first thing I do when installing WinXP is to enable the "Classic Windows" style which removes the XP playskool look and replaces it with the Win2K look. So clearly I have "change" issues. :)
Please add a [SOLVED] at the end of your original subject header if your question has been answered and solved.

User avatar
tdapple
Level 2
Level 2
Posts: 62
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 9:14 am
Location: Plano, TX
Contact:

Re: Gnome 3

Post by tdapple » Wed Apr 29, 2009 1:20 pm

altair4 wrote: The first thing I do when installing WinXP is to enable the "Classic Windows" style which removes the XP playskool look and replaces it with the Win2K look. So clearly I have "change" issues. :)

:lol:

Skorpiius
Level 1
Level 1
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu May 07, 2009 6:47 pm

Re: Gnome 3

Post by Skorpiius » Thu May 07, 2009 6:51 pm

altair4 wrote:I've been a non-stop KDE user since Suse 6. Mint is my first Gnome distro because of what was happening with KDE4. With Gnome3 it looks like I'm going to read the same discussions and the same arguments over why Gnome3 is such an improvement. To me Gnome and KDE seems to be in a race to see who can produce the most infantile DE. I agree that XFCE looks like a viable alternative unless they get caught up in this race to the bottom.

I do apologize, I guess I got a little carried away. I don't think I'm the right person to voice an opinion anyway. The first thing I do when installing WinXP is to enable the "Classic Windows" style which removes the XP playskool look and replaces it with the Win2K look. So clearly I have "change" issues. :)
Just do the hack that allows you to use the Royale Noir theme, it's wayyy better than the dayglo default.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v204/ ... emixed.jpg

muse5187
Level 1
Level 1
Posts: 27
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 11:02 pm

Re: Gnome 3

Post by muse5187 » Sat May 09, 2009 6:54 pm

Wow I don't think I will ever be using gnome3 as it is now. -__-;;

Linux-user
Level 1
Level 1
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 7:50 am

Re: Gnome 3

Post by Linux-user » Thu May 21, 2009 8:05 am

muse5187 wrote:Wow I don't think I will ever be using gnome3 as it is now. -__-;;
True. I like GNOME the way it is now, but I really don't like the interface of GNOME 3. Like Paul_Vandenberg said:
Paul_Vandenberg wrote:One of them is the apparent lack of an organized menu structure. I don't like the idea of 'searching' for apps.
The day GNOME removes its current interface and moves on to this new interface, I'll immediately move to another Desktop Environment. I think I'll move to Xfce, like others suggested.
altair4 wrote:The first thing I do when installing WinXP is to enable the "Classic Windows" style which removes the XP playskool look and replaces it with the Win2K look.
That's exactly what I do. I hate the default look of Windows XP. In the days I used Windows XP I even modified my installation disc, so the default theme wasn't even available. Windows Classic was the only theme available on my system.

symon1980
Level 2
Level 2
Posts: 50
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2008 7:13 am

Re: Gnome 3

Post by symon1980 » Sun Jun 07, 2009 1:12 am

I think that Gnome 3 looks like utter crap. I for one moved to Kde... its pretty damn stable now, and with kde 4.3 on its way soon, theres no way gnome will catch up
in terms of beauty, and modern looking d.e.
kde is the future in my opinion :)
gnome is going downhill if this is the way they are headed. xfce could do with a makeover in my opinion. looks good in dreamlinux though.

gymophett
Level 1
Level 1
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 11:48 pm

Re: Gnome 3

Post by gymophett » Thu Jun 11, 2009 12:16 am

I've always loved Gnome. I don't want any major changes, and from what I can tell, it will be pretty major.
I enjoy Gnome 2.xx :(

User avatar
Old Marcus
Level 4
Level 4
Posts: 389
Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2008 4:51 pm
Location: Exeter, UK

Re: Gnome 3

Post by Old Marcus » Sun Jun 14, 2009 7:05 pm

It's too early for me to comment with much knowledge, but I'm going to stick with gnome and try gnome 3 when it comes out, since I don't like KDE and Xfce is too limiting compared to what I'm used to.
Linux Mint 8 RC1 = Nice
'apt install' can be used on Linux Mint as a shortcut for 'sudo apt-get install'. 'apt x' can be used for various other apt commands as well.
When a problem is solved, please add [SOLVED] to your thread title.

exploder
Level 15
Level 15
Posts: 5532
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 10:50 am
Location: HartfordCity, Indiana USA
Contact:

Re: Gnome 3

Post by exploder » Sun Jun 14, 2009 8:15 pm

I watched a video clip of Gnome 3 and I agree with the above comment that it looks like crap. KDE 4 on the other hand is starting to get some functionality again. Gnome 3 is still a ways off, so lets hope for the best.

gotjazz
Level 4
Level 4
Posts: 383
Joined: Fri May 28, 2010 11:38 am
Location: Vienna, Austria

Re: Gnome 3

Post by gotjazz » Fri Jul 16, 2010 1:16 am

hrm I have to admit I enjoyed playing around with gnome-shell quite a bit. Once you get used to it, it even borders on being efficient. But there is a lot missing. For example - as mentioned before in this thread - the possibility to browse apps in some organized fashion is something no DE can live without. Favorites+search+all-at-once just don't cut it.
The top panel could also use somethign like a mini task-bar for stuff that's open on the same workspace - or would that be too close to the oooooh so overcome "desktop-metaphor"?

Anyway, I could see myself using it exclusively for a couple of days if it wasn't for the fact that I get completely messed up icons and other display errors after a short time with kernel mode settings and poor performance without kms (just the other way around from how old-school gnome behaves) on my ati x800xt.

And if I do take it for an extended spin I want my videos resizing smoothly when dragging them from wokspace to workspace and watching them resize.....
(I know - it's silly)
Image

User avatar
monkeyboy
Level 5
Level 5
Posts: 791
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 11:30 am

Re: Gnome 3

Post by monkeyboy » Fri Jul 16, 2010 3:13 am

Every time there is a big change in a DE there is an accompanying manure storm that continues till the bugs get worked out and the users get over the learning curve hump. As a daily GNOME user I too am a bit apprehensive about the change but even if it totally sucks the sun will continue to shine and the earth will turn.
If you don't like it, make something better
If you can't make something better, adapt
If you can't do either ball your panties up and cry.

Complaining is like masticating most anyone can do it.
However doing it in public is really hardcore.

linuxnut69
Level 1
Level 1
Posts: 9
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 4:38 pm

Re: Gnome 3

Post by linuxnut69 » Sun Jan 23, 2011 2:55 pm

Well i have officially switched to KDE and XFCE. Just when the Gnome people get everything right they have to mess with it, like they are nervous, since Ubuntu is going with that unity crap that takes up valuable desktop space. Gnome is perfect the way it is especially with Compiz enabled and useable. I mean how many computers do not have a graphics card capable of running it ? (Few if any) Why can't the drivers for Nvidia and Ati auto install/set up when installing ? I believe Several different Gnome styles with different Compiz variations(settings, cube vs sphere, etc...) would really be the way to go. There is a distro called Ultimate edition, Ubuntu based, that has these kinds of things figured out, running from a live CD effects are enabled, BUT sadaly the art work reminds me of a 12 year old using paint to make it look cool. However all that can be changed to your liking, themes, backgrounds, etc... I am just wondering if Gnome is trying to go with a more Windoze style, Looks that way to me. Just my 2 cents.

User avatar
DrHu
Level 17
Level 17
Posts: 7537
Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2009 8:20 pm

Re: Gnome 3

Post by DrHu » Sun Jan 23, 2011 3:41 pm

I think overly complicated menu structures that attempt to automate user preferences/choices will always be a bad way to go.

I am using Lxde, but I can say, I do miss the GUI menu edit option, since that version of a Linux desktop requires a .text (*.txt) file edit to setup a desktop item
--not a deal breaker, but somewhat disconcerting, since one tends to forget the exact template, unless doing it fairly constantly, the same goes for working with bash scripts or terminal commands: requires practice and repetition to imprint into the brain..

However it is a simpler menu interface, and that makes it a lighter weight desktop

I thought Ubuntu was heading towards its own unique branding of their desktop schema (look and function) via their Unity desktop, so it might not even be an option on the installation for their distribution
http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news ... u-1104.ars
  • Shuttleworth described desktop adoption of Unity as the "most significant change ever" for Ubuntu. He also acknowledged that it is a "risky step" and that much work remains to be done to prepare for the transition. The move reflects Ubuntu's growing divergence from the standard upstream GNOME configuration and effort to differentiate itself with a distinctive user experience

ShyGuy
Level 2
Level 2
Posts: 87
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 6:04 pm
Contact:

Re: Gnome 3

Post by ShyGuy » Tue Apr 05, 2011 3:16 am

I've been watching the promo videos over at the Gnome 3 website http://www.gnome3.org/ It looks like a a lot of the functions are already available with Compiz. I suppose if it's not to my liking, I can try KDE again, I wasn't impressed back with the early 4.# versions of KDE.

sespela
Level 1
Level 1
Posts: 25
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 1:21 pm

Re: Gnome 3

Post by sespela » Tue Apr 05, 2011 8:36 am

I'm quite positive regarding Gnome 3.0
I mean to be able to compete with Windows or OsX, Linux need to have something that's uniqe. Gnome as of now is getting quite Old-skool. Things must move forward, that's just the way it is.

ShyGuy
Level 2
Level 2
Posts: 87
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 6:04 pm
Contact:

Re: Gnome 3

Post by ShyGuy » Tue Apr 05, 2011 12:28 pm

There are things that look good abotu Gnome 3, but I will have to spend time with it to know for sure.

Like the lack of minimize maximize buttons on the menu bar. It looks good and makes sense, but then I realized that dragging windows using a laptop touchpad isn't the most comfortable thing.

Post Reply

Return to “Chat about Linux Mint”