There are three interesting articles on Phoronix today:
https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page= ... Linux-5.10
Kernel 5.10 sees NFS performance changes for handling sparse files.
As an aside, I like the phrase, "efficiently transferring holes". For those not familiar with sparse files, the thought of transferring a hole from one place to another would probably cause a good dose of cognitive dissonance.
https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page= ... olt-Kernel
There have been a few posts on the forum about undervolting laptop CPUs, and now it's being discussed for the kernel.
https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page= ... x-5.10-PCI
For those of you not familiar with DMA attacks: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DMA_attack
Faster NFS, PCIe DMA attacks, and undervolting CPUs
Forum rules
Do not post support questions here. Before you post read the forum rules. Topics in this forum are automatically closed 6 months after creation.
Do not post support questions here. Before you post read the forum rules. Topics in this forum are automatically closed 6 months after creation.
-
- Level 16
- Posts: 6078
- Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2012 10:17 pm
Faster NFS, PCIe DMA attacks, and undervolting CPUs
Last edited by LockBot on Wed Dec 28, 2022 7:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Topic automatically closed 6 months after creation. New replies are no longer allowed.
Reason: Topic automatically closed 6 months after creation. New replies are no longer allowed.
- absque fenestris
- Level 12
- Posts: 4124
- Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2016 8:42 pm
- Location: Confoederatio Helvetica
Re: Faster NFS, PCIe DMA attacks, and undervolting CPUs
About DMA attacks: is that the price for a stable connection?
It reminds me of the reviews FireWire (on the Mac) received.
Only - in contrast to the nominally faster USB-2 (480 Mbits), FireWire 400 (400 Mbits) delivered almost the promised performance reliably and permanently, as did FireWire 800 later.
USB-2 was a disaster on the Mac and here in the Mint forums you read again and again about terrible USB-2 connections in Windows machines.
In the meantime, USB-C (the latest generations) and Thunderbolt seem to be slowly growing together - is USB-C likely to be exposed to these DMA attacks at some point?
It reminds me of the reviews FireWire (on the Mac) received.
Only - in contrast to the nominally faster USB-2 (480 Mbits), FireWire 400 (400 Mbits) delivered almost the promised performance reliably and permanently, as did FireWire 800 later.
USB-2 was a disaster on the Mac and here in the Mint forums you read again and again about terrible USB-2 connections in Windows machines.
In the meantime, USB-C (the latest generations) and Thunderbolt seem to be slowly growing together - is USB-C likely to be exposed to these DMA attacks at some point?
-
- Level 16
- Posts: 6078
- Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2012 10:17 pm
Re: Faster NFS, PCIe DMA attacks, and undervolting CPUs
You didn't read the wiki link, did you.absque fenestris wrote: ⤴Thu Oct 22, 2020 9:20 pm ... is USB-C likely to be exposed to these DMA attacks at some point?
- absque fenestris
- Level 12
- Posts: 4124
- Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2016 8:42 pm
- Location: Confoederatio Helvetica
Re: Faster NFS, PCIe DMA attacks, and undervolting CPUs
I read it twice - and also the entry about Thunderbolt - now maybe it only affects the next generation of USB ...Kadaitcha Man wrote: ⤴Thu Oct 22, 2020 11:03 pmYou didn't read the wiki link, did you.absque fenestris wrote: ⤴Thu Oct 22, 2020 9:20 pm ... is USB-C likely to be exposed to these DMA attacks at some point?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thunderbolt_(interface)USB4
Main article: USB4
The USB4 specification was released on 29 August 2019 by USB Implementers Forum,[67] based on the Thunderbolt 3 protocol specification.[68]
It supports 40 Gbit/s (5 GB/s) throughput, is compatible with Thunderbolt 3, and backwards compatible with USB 3.2 and USB 2.0.[69][70] The architecture defines a method to share a single high-speed link with multiple end device types dynamically that best serves the transfer of data by type and application.
Thunderbolt 4
Thunderbolt 4 was announced at CES 2020[71] and the final specification was released in July 2020.[72] The key differences between Thunderbolt 4 and Thunderbolt 3 are support for USB4 protocol and data rates, a minimum bandwidth requirement of 32 Gbps for PCIe link, support for dual 4K displays, and Intel VT-d-based direct memory access protection to prevent physical DMA attacks. The maximum bandwidth remains at 40 Gbps, the same as Thunderbolt 3 and four times faster than USB 3.2 Gen2x1.[73][72] Supporting products should arrive in 2020 and will include Tiger Lake mobile processors for Project Athena notebooks and 8000-series standalone Thunderbolt controllers.