Page 7 of 7

Re: Why is Linux a bit slower than windows

Posted: Wed Aug 04, 2010 2:29 pm
by libssd
Thanks for providing a link to data rather than opinion. I was somewhat surprised at the disk performance, which is probably the area (after boot time) where real world performance differences are most noticeable.

Re: Why is Linux a bit slower than windows

Posted: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:58 pm
by JonM33
Ainer wrote:I don't really care for these type of topics, but here are some real metrics (and not just anecdote) for anyone that cares.

http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=a ... 7_ws&num=1
Yes, I agree that Linux is worlds better at file transfers.

OpenGL benchmarks are moot as they are highly dependent upon the drivers, which isn't a fault of Linux.

Re: Why is Linux a bit slower than windows

Posted: Wed Aug 04, 2010 8:51 pm
by randomizer
NTFS is too damn old.

Re: Why is Linux a bit slower than windows

Posted: Wed Aug 04, 2010 10:57 pm
by fbobraga
Ainer wrote: Yes, I agree that Linux is worlds better at file transfers.
(...)
Yeap, I agree too. But it's almost the opposite when the comparation comes to GUI responsiveness: there isn't X.org in the middle of it, in the Microsoft world :P

Re: Why is Linux a bit slower than windows

Posted: Wed Aug 04, 2010 11:13 pm
by JonM33
randomizer wrote:NTFS is too damn old.
Yes, it hasn't been updated since Windows XP.

Re: Why is Linux a bit slower than windows

Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 4:03 am
by jesica
When people at work are board and start dowwnloading games and the Windows pc get virusses, it can get very slow, and Firefox is a slow brower overall, get LXDE and Opera, Linux can get really fast then :mrgreen: