Re: antivirus
Posted: Sat Jun 08, 2019 10:41 am
That is a matter of personal preference
Yeah I even have a desktop icon short cut to GUFW, it's just very easy to click and use (well check it is still on, from time to time).
Go ahead and start a thread about it!Matthew_Wai wrote: ⤴Sun Jun 09, 2019 5:06 am I perfectly don't understand why no one has talked about ransomware.
Yes. That's why I strongly advise *not* to install any Windows emulator like Wine: they're all Windows malware compatible.Kurt3162 wrote: ⤴Sun Jun 09, 2019 7:11 pm Speaking about antivirus on Mint - I do have something I'd like to pick your brains on:
Assuming you run Wine (for whatever reason, let's just assume you need to), don't you have to also run an antivirus against Windows malware, since it could run through Wine and create problems?
No. You can, if you want, but you don't have to. I have Wine and I don't. I figure that not much malware comes in the shape of .exe files anymore, and even if one did (I guess that would have to arrive by download or email), I'd have to open it; then Wine might try to run it, and provided that it would run (as we know, Wine is fiddly and fails a lot) it would then proceed to try to do... something intended to be possible on a Windows system.
That's only easier if you know the code. For many, including the novices that Mint targets, it isn't.
I fully understand your point of view (and even agree on a theoretical level), but it is difficult to put into practice for Windows defectors (I'm one too): You have a lot of software (often expensive) you'd like to keep using, and then there is the professional world, where you often have company-specific programs which only run in Windows, and forcing the company to create a Linux version just for you is obviously not an option: Firing you and hiring somebody using Windows like everybody else would be cheaper...
That's a non-answer! The implied question was "shouldn't you, if you run Wine, also run an antivirus?". Of course you can decide not to do so, like you can decide not to use protection when meeting strangers, but I'm not sure how sensible a decision that might be on the long run.
Uh, actually they all do? As a malware at some point you'll need to do something nasty, and except in the case you just feed instructions to a resident handler (script malware), you'll need to bring your own instruction handler with you, lest you end up lying there as a malicious, but totally inert file...
Like simply encrypting/deleting your files? Well, it wouldn't be able to proceed outside your /home folder, but then again that's where all the good stuff resides. Everything outside that folder is only worth an hour with an installation DVD...
So run WIndows via dual boot or in a VM. Pjotr is quitre right (not many here are capable of arguing with him BTW), wine introduces more vulnerabilities. And it's a stupid hack that fails with most WIndows apps and often works poorly with those that run..Kurt3162 wrote: ⤴Mon Jun 10, 2019 8:48 amI fully understand your point of view (and even agree on a theoretical level), but it is difficult to put into practice for Windows defectors (I'm one too): You have a lot of software (often expensive) you'd like to keep using, and then there is the professional world, where you often have company-specific programs which only run in Windows, and forcing the company to create a Linux version just for you is obviously not an option: Firing you and hiring somebody using Windows like everybody else would be cheaper...
People coming from Windows love Wine, since it allows them to keep their Windows programs, giving them the best of two worlds. It's actually even a major selling point for deciding people to switch to Linux...
Now I admit those people aren't the intended targets of Linux, they aren't code jockeys or free software passionates, they are just the average Joe and Jane in the streets, only interested in having a hassle-free working computer.
----
That's a non-answer! The implied question was "shouldn't you, if you run Wine, also run an antivirus?". Of course you can decide not to do so, like you can decide not to use protection when meeting strangers, but I'm not sure how sensible a decision that might be on the long run.
I don't run an antivirus either, but I don't feel good about it. I feel I might regret it one day, given it's a work computer.
Uh, actually they all do? As a malware at some point you'll need to do something nasty, and except in the case you just feed instructions to a resident handler (script malware), you'll need to bring your own instruction handler with you, lest you end up lying there as a malicious, but totally inert file...
Like simply encrypting/deleting your files? Well, it wouldn't be able to proceed outside your /home folder, but then again that's where all the good stuff resides. Everything outside that folder is only worth an hour with an installation DVD...
I agree chances are low, and (unlike with Windows) you have some real chances to not get infected, but it all depends on one's degree of confidence/insouciance - Wine does open a door, and objectively rises infection chances from "extremely unlikely" to just "unlikely".
True! That is because the correct answer hinges on what we personally consider to be an acceptable risk. In other words, it's subjective. So there is no final answer.
No, they do not. A lot of malware does indeed rely on a resident handler nowadays. The handler is named Javascript. Which is why all my browsers run NoScript.Kurt3162 wrote: ⤴Mon Jun 10, 2019 8:48 amUh, actually they all do? As a malware at some point you'll need to do something nasty, and except in the case you just feed instructions to a resident handler (script malware), you'll need to bring your own instruction handler with you, lest you end up lying there as a malicious, but totally inert file...
Would it really get that far if it expects to land on a full installation of Windows, not something like [not even] an emulator? That depends a lot on how well-crafted it is. If it was not coded with Wine-using Linux users in mind, chances seem slim. Not non-existent, but slim.
That objectively depends on your subjective definition of 'unlikely'. We can agree that it opens a possible door. It would be unwise to deny that. But how large the risks are, is impossible to say, and some people simply decide that to them, personally, it's not worth it.Kurt3162 wrote: ⤴Mon Jun 10, 2019 8:48 am I agree chances are low, and (unlike with Windows) you have some real chances to not get infected, but it all depends on one's degree of confidence/insouciance - Wine does open a door, and objectively rises infection chances from "extremely unlikely" to just "unlikely".
Too complicated for most users, and too much hassle for frequent use (not to mention a VM requires you to pay for a Windows license).
Nobody denies that.
Actually it only depends on if it does call functions Wine does not provide.