So called lightweight Linux distros...
Forum rules
Do not post support questions here. Before you post read the forum rules. Topics in this forum are automatically closed 6 months after creation.
Do not post support questions here. Before you post read the forum rules. Topics in this forum are automatically closed 6 months after creation.
Re: So called lightweight Linux distros...
As much as Mint Cinnamon annoys the crap out of me for having loads of programs installed that i will never use i keep finding myself going back to it.
Re: So called lightweight Linux distros...
Good Dog
My laptop, older,,,getting bogged down, take too long to boot, programs move slow.
I decided, if I cam make Puppy Slacko install Libre Office and my printer, I will use it.
I did it. I am so impressed with Puppy.
A pretty desk top is missing, but it found everything else including my Laser Printer.
In the software package was Google Earth, click to install, WOW, google earth runs fast in Puppy on my old laptop.
While the new Puppy has a lot of new stuff, it stopped barking.
Good Dog,,,I like Puppy
My laptop, older,,,getting bogged down, take too long to boot, programs move slow.
I decided, if I cam make Puppy Slacko install Libre Office and my printer, I will use it.
I did it. I am so impressed with Puppy.
A pretty desk top is missing, but it found everything else including my Laser Printer.
In the software package was Google Earth, click to install, WOW, google earth runs fast in Puppy on my old laptop.
While the new Puppy has a lot of new stuff, it stopped barking.
Good Dog,,,I like Puppy
- Portreve
- Level 13
- Posts: 4870
- Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2011 12:03 am
- Location: Within 20,004 km of YOU!
- Contact:
Re: So called lightweight Linux distros...
One of the great things about the GNU+Linux world is that it is incredibly adaptable to probably every possible conceivable need. It's used in embedded applications like running routers and DVRs, it's used with supercomputers, server farms, it underpins desktop, tablet, and phone OSs... I mean, you could make it run a toaster if you wanted to stick electronics in one.
This, then, is the reason it's even possible to have deliberately light-weight distros as talked about up-thread here.
However, let's also not forget there's the "normal use case" range of distros out there, plus what you decide to use as a desktop environment.
What I've found, though it certainly does have its drawbacks, is that the very foundational Debian distro is actually pretty clean and efficient and, while one might not call it specifically "lightweight" it's hard to think of a fuller distro which is as minimally resource-demanding.
I have run the Cinnamon desktop environment on both LinuxMint and Debian, and far and away it is insanely faster in Debian than LinuxMint.
I also use Debian full-time to run my G4-based Mac mini as a headless file server because, frankly, you just can't find much else out there that supports the hardware. It's an older box and certainly would have issues if you tried to run it in a commercial environment, but as a personal file server in my house which doesn't do anything else, I'll run that box until it dies.
This, then, is the reason it's even possible to have deliberately light-weight distros as talked about up-thread here.
However, let's also not forget there's the "normal use case" range of distros out there, plus what you decide to use as a desktop environment.
What I've found, though it certainly does have its drawbacks, is that the very foundational Debian distro is actually pretty clean and efficient and, while one might not call it specifically "lightweight" it's hard to think of a fuller distro which is as minimally resource-demanding.
I have run the Cinnamon desktop environment on both LinuxMint and Debian, and far and away it is insanely faster in Debian than LinuxMint.
I also use Debian full-time to run my G4-based Mac mini as a headless file server because, frankly, you just can't find much else out there that supports the hardware. It's an older box and certainly would have issues if you tried to run it in a commercial environment, but as a personal file server in my house which doesn't do anything else, I'll run that box until it dies.
Flying this flag in support of freedom 🇺🇦
Recommended keyboard layout: English (intl., with AltGR dead keys)
Podcasts: Linux Unplugged, Destination Linux
Also check out Thor Hartmannsson's Linux Tips YouTube Channel
Recommended keyboard layout: English (intl., with AltGR dead keys)
Podcasts: Linux Unplugged, Destination Linux
Also check out Thor Hartmannsson's Linux Tips YouTube Channel
Re: So called lightweight Linux distros...
Well had some extra time today so I tried Peppermint 7 on a more capable computer and very impressed with how well it runs.The Old Timer wrote:I tried Peppermint 7 and it is A-OK / very colorful / full of features although I didn't find it to be very light weight on my old computer seemed to be very processor intensive.Pjotr wrote:Take a look at Peppermint OS:
https://sites.google.com/site/easylinux ... peppermint
Dell-Optiplex-320 (06/17/2007).
Intel Pentium D 950 (3400 MHz).
Radeon Xpress 200/1100 [RC410] Integrated Graphics Adapter.
DDR2 Memory 2.0GB.
Hard Drive WD 40GB 7200 rpm.
Think I will keep it and see what develops.
Very well designed Linux Distro.
Dell Optiplex 360 (11/28/2008).
Intel Core2 Duo e6300 Processor 1.8 GHz (1066 MHz FSB).
DDR2 Memory 3.0 GB (800 MHz FSB).
Intel 82G33/G31 Express Integrated Graphics Adapter.
Hard Drive SAMSUNG 80.0GB 7200 RPM.
Re: So called lightweight Linux distros...
+1 for WattOSBG405 wrote:WattOS looks like a viable option for ancient hardware. Manjaro Netbook Edition might be worth a look but I find Mint 17.3 Xfce works fine on the lower spec ones as does LM 17.3 KDE on my Acer.
Re: So called lightweight Linux distros...
Light-weight distro by reasonable definition, or at least my def, is one which has a smaller memory footprint, less cpu overhead and utilizes less diskspace.
But as Flemur mentioned, any distro can be converted to be light-weight, this is gnu/Linux. It's just a matter of how much stuff a person has to strip out and customize during the process to get the Nix OS there.
Many distros offer a net-install or minimal base and then leave it up to the user to build to their taste from there.
Ie: Debian net-install, my go to solution. Arch, though either can be as light or heavy as the enduser decides.
Then there's ootb distros who come with the pre-config intention of being light-weight, Anti-X, RIP #! linux(now carried on with Bunsenlabs Linux). Visit distrowatch.com and search for distros in the meant for old computers category.
Will be ones light-weight ootb listed there.
But as Flemur mentioned, any distro can be converted to be light-weight, this is gnu/Linux. It's just a matter of how much stuff a person has to strip out and customize during the process to get the Nix OS there.
Many distros offer a net-install or minimal base and then leave it up to the user to build to their taste from there.
Ie: Debian net-install, my go to solution. Arch, though either can be as light or heavy as the enduser decides.
Then there's ootb distros who come with the pre-config intention of being light-weight, Anti-X, RIP #! linux(now carried on with Bunsenlabs Linux). Visit distrowatch.com and search for distros in the meant for old computers category.
Will be ones light-weight ootb listed there.
-
- Level 3
- Posts: 186
- Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2012 4:10 pm
Re: So called lightweight Linux distros...
One thing that's not mentioned enough in forums is how lightweight linuxes are helping to keep old computers out of the landfills. There are hundreds of millions of boxes in the world that are seen as just too old to be of any good use, and many of them end up just being rubbished, not recycled in the least way (I've encountered at least 20 of them in the last year, salvaged a few). But many many of them can be repurposed with linux.Portreve wrote:......I also use Debian full-time to run my G4-based Mac mini as a headless file server because, frankly, you just can't find much else out there that supports the hardware. It's an older box and certainly would have issues if you tried to run it in a commercial environment, but as a personal file server in my house which doesn't do anything else, I'll run that box until it dies.
So thanks to all of you who use those light os's to keep old equipment running usefully instead of polluting the environment. Kudos.
Re: So called lightweight Linux distros...
I consider Linux Mint Xfce and MATE lightweight. Even on ten year old machines if you can upgrade the ram to 2 gigs those two distros will run like a champ.
- Portreve
- Level 13
- Posts: 4870
- Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2011 12:03 am
- Location: Within 20,004 km of YOU!
- Contact:
Re: So called lightweight Linux distros...
I can't speak for other countries, but here in the U.S., we are the pre-eminent "disposable culture". Whether it's hardware or knowledge, we just discard anything seen as old or not the latest thing, and now our landfills are mere cesspools of good-but-dated technology. And don't even get me started on the subject of recycling. I have friends in Germany who gasp in horror at the state of recycling affairs in the U.S. They separate out, for example, just about every type of item — say, different kinds of glass — whereas here we're lucky in a lot of areas if they even will take certain kinds of items as recyclable.
Flying this flag in support of freedom 🇺🇦
Recommended keyboard layout: English (intl., with AltGR dead keys)
Podcasts: Linux Unplugged, Destination Linux
Also check out Thor Hartmannsson's Linux Tips YouTube Channel
Recommended keyboard layout: English (intl., with AltGR dead keys)
Podcasts: Linux Unplugged, Destination Linux
Also check out Thor Hartmannsson's Linux Tips YouTube Channel
Re: So called lightweight Linux distros...
We used to have the Maytag man who could repair you stuff and keep it running forever. But thanks to corporations and government. Repair costs, cost as much as a new item. Even if you repair it yourself. but dont worry The auto industry is working diligently to make sure people cannot repair there own cars. Which will push cars even closer to the same territory. Soda/Pop tasted better with real sugar and glass bottles. I miss the good ole days.
Re: So called lightweight Linux distros...
hi, which of these do you recommend for new hardware with minimal RAM? -thxThe Old Timer wrote:Antix ... is a good little one that does everything the big flagship mainstream Linux Distros do just faster.
I use Lubuntu 16.04 a lot on older computers as I find it to work well.
Re: So called lightweight Linux distros...
How much RAM is minimal RAM?johnywhy wrote:hi, which of these do you recommend for new hardware with minimal RAM? -thx
If your issue is solved, kindly indicate that by editing the first post in the topic, and adding [SOLVED] to the title. Thanks!
Re: So called lightweight Linux distros...
I was about to ask the same thing!
Xfce runs fine on my machines which only have 512MB RAM. It depends what you do with it, for example you'll probably struggle with a lot of tabs or open applications but I find my ancient K7S5A based system is pretty snappy, in fact surprisingly so. Horses for courses. Give it a decent sized swap partition!
Xfce runs fine on my machines which only have 512MB RAM. It depends what you do with it, for example you'll probably struggle with a lot of tabs or open applications but I find my ancient K7S5A based system is pretty snappy, in fact surprisingly so. Horses for courses. Give it a decent sized swap partition!
Dell Inspiron 1525 - LM17.3 CE 64-------------------Lenovo T440 - Manjaro KDE with Mint VMs
Toshiba NB250 - Manjaro KDE------------------------Acer Aspire One D255E - LM21.3 Xfce
Acer Aspire E11 ES1-111M - LM18.2 KDE 64 ----… Two ROMS don't make a WRITE …
Toshiba NB250 - Manjaro KDE------------------------Acer Aspire One D255E - LM21.3 Xfce
Acer Aspire E11 ES1-111M - LM18.2 KDE 64 ----… Two ROMS don't make a WRITE …
Re: So called lightweight Linux distros...
If you only have 512 ram then go with antix-16 and if you have 1.0 GB or more ram Lubuntu 16.04.johnywhy wrote:hi, which of these do you recommend for new hardware with minimal RAM? -thxThe Old Timer wrote:Antix ... is a good little one that does everything the big flagship mainstream Linux Distros do just faster.
I use Lubuntu 16.04 a lot on older computers as I find it to work well.
Re: So called lightweight Linux distros...
MY experience with Xfce no matter what Linux distro you are using anything less than 2.0 GB ram just is SLOW especially if you are running with an integrated graphics adapter which uses system memory.BG405 wrote:I was about to ask the same thing!
Xfce runs fine on my machines which only have 512MB RAM. It depends what you do with it, for example you'll probably struggle with a lot of tabs or open applications but I find my ancient K7S5A based system is pretty snappy, in fact surprisingly so. Horses for courses. Give it a decent sized swap partition!
Re: So called lightweight Linux distros...
i'm trying xfce Porteus linux (about 250 MB ISO) on 512 MB RAM, and not bad! (On VMware)The Old Timer wrote:MY experience with Xfce no matter what Linux distro you are using anything less than 2.0 GB ram just is SLOW especially if you are running with an integrated graphics adapter which uses system memory.
Re: So called lightweight Linux distros...
I tried LXLE Linux and Porteus Linux and didn't have any luck with either of them.
Just couldn't get LXLE to run at all and couldn't find solutions for problems with Porteus.
Just couldn't get LXLE to run at all and couldn't find solutions for problems with Porteus.
Re: So called lightweight Linux distros...
Hm, maybe a hardware issue?The Old Timer wrote:I couldn't find solutions for problems with Porteus.
So far, working well for me.
Re: So called lightweight Linux distros...
Exactly as I run ten year old desktops and do run into hardware problems occasionally.
I've had real good luck with antix-16 on old computers that I use.
I've had real good luck with antix-16 on old computers that I use.
Last edited by The Old Timer on Thu Mar 30, 2017 12:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: So called lightweight Linux distros...
I'm guessing your hardware may require the very same drivers, whatever Linux you're running, and therefore maybe you can keep those drivers on hand. No?
I'm not expert, I'm sure you tried everything.
I'm not expert, I'm sure you tried everything.