[Updated] AMD Faces Class-Action Lawsuit Over Allegedly Misleading with the Core Count of Bulldozer Processors
Forum rules
Do not post support questions here. Before you post read the forum rules. Topics in this forum are automatically closed 30 days after creation.
Do not post support questions here. Before you post read the forum rules. Topics in this forum are automatically closed 30 days after creation.
[Updated] AMD Faces Class-Action Lawsuit Over Allegedly Misleading with the Core Count of Bulldozer Processors
Last edited by LockBot on Wed Dec 07, 2022 4:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Topic automatically closed 30 days after creation. New replies are no longer allowed.
Reason: Topic automatically closed 30 days after creation. New replies are no longer allowed.
"Tune for maximum Smoke and then read the Instructions".
Re: [Updated] AMD Faces Class-Action Lawsuit Over Allegedly Misleading with the Core Count of Bulldozer Processors
Old by a good number of years.blueocean wrote: ⤴Fri Oct 25, 2019 7:57 pm That's old news. Update:
https://www.theverge.com/circuitbreaker ... ozer-chips
Ernie.
Re: [Updated] AMD Faces Class-Action Lawsuit Over Allegedly Misleading with the Core Count of Bulldozer Processors
I had good luck with AMD and usually bought their hardware, but my last build with the 4400G gave me fits with Linux (waited almost a year after it came to market before trying). I sent it back and switched to Intel.
Re: [Updated] AMD Faces Class-Action Lawsuit Over Allegedly Misleading with the Core Count of Bulldozer Processors
Appears as though they are paying out up to $300 https://www.partitionwizard.com/partiti ... ement.html