

this guy is so smart lolAlso I suspect that this Mac OS is sending personal information to Apple and other communist companies and organizations!
eerrhmm...And I must also add that the link of terrorism and linux is not even hidden, if you take a look at website like this one : http://plf.zarb.org/about.php
Linux is just a anarchist invention aiming at bringing chaos and death everywhere in the world. I am still amazed to see that no one is able to see the truth in their games.
why laugh about something you don't know a single thing about? her own blog is running on a Linux machine...Tristan, I believe you!
This rj guy is probably a typical liberal liar.
Most of the internet is running on linux? Don’t make me laugh!!!
I used linux once. It’s terrible.
some comments from the author:#
Anonymous April 26th, 2006 6:06 AM
too bad ShelleyTheRepublican.com
blogs is hosted on linux as shown by the nmap port scanner.
# nmap -O shelleytherepublican.com
…
Running: Linux 2.4.X|2.5.X, D-Link embedded
OS details: Linux 2.4.0 – 2.5.20, Linux 2.4.18 – 2.4.20, Linux 2.4.26, Linux 2.4.27 or D-Link DSL-500T (running linux 2.4)
Time to put your acts where your words are and find a linux-free hosting solution.
#
Shelley April 26th, 2006 6:15 AM
Sorry, I think you are a liar.
Me and linux hosting? Never!
why would that be?Thanks for posting my article Shelley; I submitted this to the mainstream IT press, but none of them wanted to know. It’s shocking to learn that the same liberal bias that infects mainstream news-sources also affects the technical press.
this proofs he doesn't know what he's talking aboutYes, Linux is a primative European clone; It is much less capable than Windows. In fact it omits features that were standard in Windows back in 1998; For example Linux has no built-in anti-virus or anti-spyware software. You cannot even buy popular utilities like Norton Security to compensate for this fact. There are no tools for common tasks like defragging a hard disk. God knows what you would use to send a fax or make a website. You cannot even get Front Page for Linux.
I was surprised a guy who writes this was able to mail this article to the blog...Indeed, if Blogger.com were using Linux I have no idea how they might have done it? I understand that you cannot get most popular web-site building tools (e.g Frontpage, Dreamweaver) for Linux.
so God is only with the Americans and not with the rest of the world?Oh my God, stop whining and complaining. I am telling you. I would never use Linux. It’s disgusting. I am using real AMERICAN software only. Everything else is for the Godless.
You need to turn to God and face the real you. You might be shocked.
Kindest of regards,
Shelley
YES!!! That is IT!!!this site is actually so stupid that it becomes funny
In a free society, thats one of the ideals that makes up freedom; the ability to say something as looney-toons as is might sound to everyone else. You take the ability to do that away.. and we've lost freedom.catilley wrote:That "comic" is not funny to me at all. It doesn't belong in a free society and does not reflect the ideas of the Linux family.
The entire open source community is somewhat of a communist idea. Look up the semantics of COMMUNE/COMMUNITY/COMMUNISM. People tend to get all freaked out about the C word because they confuse it with some kind of Fascist regime (like Stalin or even the Chinese). Don't make that same mistake.catilley wrote: Someone must be paying off the ones who online promotes these sickening ideas. I guess they are getting what they want when those like myself and many others of the Linux family speak up: ATTENTION! Please, for everyone's sake, mark this one as [SOLVED]. There are a lot of newbies such as myself who are on this forum for guidance, they read this mess and it makes them wonder if Linux users are a bunch of nuts. Some of them may never return. Now we don't want that, do we? I want Linux, especially Mint, to thrive. This is the best OS that Linux offers, in my opinion. Let's keep it that way.
Communism may have, but Socialism most certainly has not failed. In fact, the democratically socialist countries of Scandinavia are considered by the United Nations to have the best and safest lifestyle of any on earth. Their cities are safe, the people are overall happier than many other countries on earth, the governments work, there is great education and health care for all and the economies are relatively vibrant... etc etc...catilley wrote:No, it is something wrong with communism and socialism. It's terrible in the year of 2009 that people hang on to these ideas. They all have failed.
Yes, how in the hell did this topic get onto a computing forum? So you have no idea? Did your finger stumbled on the keyboard?catilley wrote:........... Down with the communists and socialists! How in the hell did this topic get onto a computing forum?
"You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means." Well, let's try to help youcatilley wrote:lagognon, no offense to you at all, but mabye I don't understand all there is to know about socialism.
Hitler was anything but a socialist. Yes, the **** party was the "Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei" (National Socialist German Workers' Party) but their politics was as far from Socialism as it's possible to get.catilley wrote:When I think of socialism, Adolf Hitler is the first person that comes to my mind.
Um. Not really. The USA is in no danger of becoming a socialist country. Limited (and it will be extremely limited) socialisation of healthcare provision does not a socialist country make. As it is, the (public) education system, many of the roads, the police-force, and many other public services in the US are taxpayer-funded, i.e. socialised. Does this make America a socialist country? So why is healthcare any different?catilley wrote:There is no need for me to explain his actions, we all know them. This kind of government flashes in my mind whenever socialism is mentioned. And, as someone else has said, this country is headed that way, for whatever that means.
So that doesn't happen in the USA? *cough* Guantanamo *cough* But seriously, this doesn't happen in the real world. Another poster mentioned Sweden as an example of a socialist country: do you seriously think that Sweden imprisons political dissidents? You're talking about totalitarianism, not socialism.catilley wrote:I just enjoy living in a free democratic society. Whether it is communism or socialism, there are freedoms lost. The government rules, no matter what. If you oppose these governments, you become a political prisoner and are treated brutally.
As a wikipedian might say... [citation needed]catilley wrote:You are told what kind of profession to work in, what home to live in, what doctor to go to, etc. In Canada, where medical care is socialized, patients go to India to get treatment, because the doctors make you wait so long for some procedures.
None of these things happen with the British (socialised) health-care system. Sure, they encourage you to quit smoking, cut down on the booze, lose weight etc. but your treatment won't stop if you don't.catilley wrote:And I know that our health care system is going to head to a similar position. They are going to tell you how to live if you are being treated for certain conditions. For example, if you are being treated for lung cancer and you continue to smoke, your treatment will most likely be discontinued. If you are obese, they are going to put you on a diet and you must stick to it, or you will be cut off.
"Rumours" that are completely unfounded, "rumours" that were started by folks like Rush Limbaugh simply to whip up fear, uncertainty and doubt about healthcare reforms. Working well, isn't it?catilley wrote:And there are rumors of "death panels" to discontinue aggressive treatments and give them pain relief only if they are chronically ill.
You have no idea how ridiculous this all sounds to someone who is living in a country with a socialised healthcare system. America spends more per-capita on healthcare than any other country in the G20. Guess what position the USA is in terms of healthcare outcomes? I'll give you a clue, it's not in the top 19.catilley wrote:Well, I fit into the third group that I described. As you can imagine, I don't like the idea of it at all. What will be next? Putting the mentally unsound, the terminally ill, the chronically ill and so forth to "sleep"? These are the things that comes to mind when I think of communism and socialism. Are you really for this? I hope not, because anyone can easily "fall" into one of these groups by the government. And your family will get basically a "form letter" stating falsely that you had a heart attack, or some other lie, when in fact they gassed you. This is exactly the way the holocaust started. The government lying. But it got too big for them to conceal. I'm not for this at all. This thread was said to be a "joke" when it started. Well, it's not one. And yes, by living in a democracy, we all have the freedom of speech and perhaps I was wrong when I said that we shouldn't be thinking or speaking of these ideas. But I have the freedom as well to blast these sickening ideas and I will continue to do so. Long live freedom and democracy! Down with the communists and socialists! How in the hell did this topic get onto a computing forum?